Jump to content

HAYDEN COLORADO SURVEY


kayakbird

Recommended Posts

Posted

74a2042c-acbb-4791-aa87-b05cb08fcabd.jpg

 

KL0592

 

This inscription was noticed on the Fairplay Colo Court House/Library about four feet above USGS H3. The elevation matches with the Hayden Survey Central Colorado map published in 1877. MAP

 

A couple of questions: did the Hayden Survey place the mark? and why has no one mentioned it as a reference object?

 

kayakbird

Posted (edited)

This inscription was noticed on the Fairplay Colo Court House/Library about four feet above USGS H3. The elevation matches with the Hayden Survey Central Colorado map published in 1877. MAP

 

A couple of questions: did the Hayden Survey place the mark? and why has no one mentioned it as a reference object?

 

kayakbird

 

Is that paint underneath the "U.S."?

 

Almost all of the King, Hayden, Powell, and Wheeler survey marks were made for mapping purposes, and were folded into the USGS in 1879 when all the Western Surveys were consolidated. Very few of them were considered accurate enough to be used by the Coast Survey and hence aren't in the NGS database.

 

Wheeler published descriptions of some of his marks, and the USGS belatedly published the triangulation of Powell, but I haven't found sources for King or Hayden that contain descriptions of their marks. The best reference I've found so far has been Gannett's 1895 Bulletin No. 123 of the USGS, and that only contains the triangulation stations, not the bench marks.

 

As a matter of interest, I spent some time trying to figure out the relationships between the surveys and what was surveyed by whom. Ultimately, I intend to make a wiki page from it. Here is a preliminary map that I made showing the surveys and the areas of overlap:

 

western-surveys.png

Edited by holograph
Posted

George,

 

Great map! I had heard of all those old surveys, but didn't know just what areas they covered.

 

At Fairplay the U.S. is definitely chiseled with maybe some paint residue. 9964 ft may have been lightly scratched and painted latter,

with Hayden just paint, and likely a different hand. To my eye the paint has retarded the erosion of the stone under Hayden and the elevation. kayakbird

 

74a2042c-acbb-4791-aa87-b05cb08fcabd.jpg

 

KL0592

Posted (edited)

Great map! I had heard of all those old surveys, but didn't know just what areas they covered.

 

At Fairplay the U.S. is definitely chiseled with maybe some paint residue. 9964 ft may have been lightly scratched and painted latter,

with Hayden just paint, and likely a different hand. To my eye the paint has retarded the erosion of the stone under Hayden and the elevation. kayakbird

 

The USGS Miscellaneous Publication #1, 1875, pg. 14, states that the elevation at Fairplay (9964 ft.) was determined by a railway survey.

 

Page 63 states that the 9964 ft. elevation was at the "Doorsill of Sentinel office before fire of 1873".

 

I suspect that the elevation on the side of the courthouse was informal, and was simply painted there for public information.

Edited by holograph
Posted

Great map! I had heard of all those old surveys, but didn't know just what areas they covered.

 

At Fairplay the U.S. is definitely chiseled with maybe some paint residue. 9964 ft may have been lightly scratched and painted latter,

with Hayden just paint, and likely a different hand. To my eye the paint has retarded the erosion of the stone under Hayden and the elevation. kayakbird

 

The USGS Miscellaneous Publication #1, 1875, pg. 14, states that the elevation at Fairplay (9964 ft.) was determined by a railway survey.

Interesting document there, Holo. I like the two separate heights given for Pike's Peak:

US Signal Service: 14,147

Parry (?): 14,216.

 

--Me.

Posted

.... 9964 ft. elevation was at the "Doorsill of Sentinel office before fire of 1873".

 

I suspect that the elevation on the side of the courthouse was informal, and was simply painted there for public information.

 

George,

 

That sounds logical. Court House was build in 1874 and Hayden map published in 1877. I doubt if they worried about +/- 0.50 FT like we do now.

 

For clarification the "Page 63' link takes you to the Fourth Edition, published in 1877; where I found a couple of interesting tidbits:

Capt Ludlow's elevations along the Carroll Trail Carroll Trail are in it and the

St Louis Directrix is give as 428.29 feet MSL, 13.5 feet higher than the 1912 published elevation. St Louis Directrix

 

Since many of the Railroad elevations seem to be tied to St Louis and many surveys tied to a RR mark,

that leaves lots of room for discrepancies.

 

kayakbird

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...