+JUSTHEJOB Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 help required Have noticed that my stat bar cache found it different to my logs Quote Link to comment
+Lovejoy and Tinker Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 help required Have noticed that my stat bar cache found it different to my logs Which number is higher? And how much is the difference? Are you looking at your 'found it' logs and missing the 'attended' logs? Have you logged a cache as found more than once by accident? Have you recently logged some new finds and the system hasn't caught up yet? Knowing the difference and which one is showing more may help point to the cause of the problem. Lovejoy Quote Link to comment
+St.Nicholas Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 help required Have noticed that my stat bar cache found it different to my logs That happens to us sometimes. Try pressing F5. That usually solves the problem Quote Link to comment
+JUSTHEJOB Posted October 3, 2010 Author Share Posted October 3, 2010 It is showing correct now! have to keep an eye on it thanks Quote Link to comment
+Gushoneybun Posted October 3, 2010 Share Posted October 3, 2010 I have been noticing this for a week or two now. It just seems to be a slight delay with the stat bar updating. A quick refresh and it is fine. Quote Link to comment
+dino-irl Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 Its been that way for a long time as the image is hosted on a different server and doesn't update straight away. Quote Link to comment
+goldpot Posted October 10, 2010 Share Posted October 10, 2010 Its been that way for a long time as the image is hosted on a different server and doesn't update straight away. In my case it always updated immediately...until a few days ago. Quote Link to comment
+JeremyR Posted October 10, 2010 Share Posted October 10, 2010 They've probably introduced some caching (in the computing sense ) to save resources. It's a good idea IMO - is it really necessary for the statbars to be accurate to the second? So long as they update within a few hours, it's not that much of a problem, is it? I'd rather resources went towards handling main site demand (particularly on 10/10/2010 ) rather than keeping statbars second-accurate. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.