Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
rogbarn

3,000 benchmarks!

Recommended Posts

Not responding officially here, but it seems benchmarks can be recovered/logged by as many people as care to do it. I don't view this is a competitive activity, and I often add additional locational information that may help the next person find the benchmark, e.g. distance to a nearby intersection, street address, etc.

Share this post


Link to post

Anyone can log ones that have been logged already. It was just an interesting note to see that 3,000 of them have been found already.

 

There is a certain satisfaction to be the first to find a benchmark and log it, so right now it

s pretty much a "gold rush" since just about every benchmark out there has gone unclaimed, at least on the web site.

 

Jeremy Irish

Groundspeak - The Language of Location

Share this post


Link to post

Logging benchmarks here is, essentially, for fun. Just like hunting caches.

 

If you happen to "recover" a benchmark whose Data Sheet reports hasn't been noted as recovered for a period of at least one year, you can submit your recovery to Deb Brown at NOAA.

 

Keep in mind, we don't want to inundate poor Deb Brown with a flood of recovery submissions. Based on conversations we've had in years past, she indicated that they appreciate civilian recovery submissions as they don't have the funding to do so themselves. Still, one can't help but think that the advent of benchmark hunting here at geocaching.com and the likely subsequent flood of recovery submissions may catch Ms. Brown offguard.

 

-

Share this post


Link to post

Makaio

I agree with your comments, but I would add that most surveyors feel there is no need to submit a recovery note, regardless of the time elapsed, unless some important aspect of the description has been changed or it contains a significant error. Generally, the main reason for submitting one is to provide a better description of how to reach the station, when the old one is no longer adequate. As long as the existing description is sufficient, there is no reason, as you say, to flood the NGS with duplicate information. I might make an exception to this rule for markers not shown as recovered for 50 years or more, but in most cases, ones that old will need a revised description anyway.

Share this post


Link to post

I agree. Of the dozens I've hunted/recovovered (before geocaching.com added this feature), I've only submitted one to NOAA - that being one which had previously been listed as not found.

 

-

Share this post


Link to post

less than a month ago, I started this thread to say we had hit 3,000 benchmarks found. Now we have jumped up to 5,000! Way to go!! Keep it up!!! Does the addition of benchmarks found to our profile page have anything to do with this quick jump?? (yup!) icon_biggrin.gificon_biggrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post

quote:
Originally posted by Timber Forester:

Do the benchmarks become unavailable as they are found? and each one is to be found once?


 

Any number of people can log finds here on geocaching.com.

 

However, an official NGS recovery form should only be filled out if it has been a few years since last recovered. So if you want to ve memorialized in the NGS database search for the 'marks not found in a while. icon_smile.gif

 

I'm not lost!

I just don't know where I am.

Share this post


Link to post

quote:
Originally posted by ArtMan:

Thanks in part to gonzo Benchmarkers like RogBarn (43 found!)


 

And in part to super-gonzo benchmarkers like ArtMan (69 found and 23 in the past week!)

Share this post


Link to post

quote:
Originally posted by RogBarn:

And in part to super-gonzo benchmarkers like ArtMan (69 found and 23 in the past week!)


 

I know, I gotta get a life. Any day, now, any day....

Share this post


Link to post

quote:
Originally posted by ArtMan:

I know, I gotta get a life. Any day, now, any day....


 

Tell me about it. Still, between us, we only have a bit over 100 benchmarks. Without lots and lots of other people going out, finding them and then taking the time to log them, we wouldn't be anywhere near 1,000 let alone 5,000. So everyone, keep on looking and keep on logging!!!

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

×
×
  • Create New...