Jump to content

(mis)naming a cache?


Recommended Posts

I placed a cache in a tree 4 feet from a light pole and called it Quick LPC PNG. Is that be too misleading? The purpose was to see if anyone would get out of their tunnel vision and just maybe look at the tree. Nothing special about the tree, I was just wondering. I already have a FTF hound disappointed in not finding it. They said they broadened their search, but I'm sure they just broadened it to other light poles. Should I not have named it as a LPC? There is a light pole there, the cache just ain't on it. I guess that is my real question.

 

Here is the cache in question.

GC2AQWY

 

 

*Edit for grammar, since I know that is the most important thing on a forum(insert sarcasm).

Edited by clumzyfly
Link to comment

The cache is a Little Purple Cache. I changed some stuff on the page, maybe now it is not such a misdirect. If people read the description(which I know not all do) then they will know that LPC in this case does not mean Lamp Post(or light pole) cache.

 

I have a few of these little purple caches that I plan to put out(uh oh, here come the nano bashers).

Edited by clumzyfly
Link to comment

I've found a few that were located very near one or more typical hiding places (lamp posts, guard rails, park benches, etc.), but were actually hidden somewhere else. I've enjoyed the challenge, and the reminder not to assume that I know where a cache will be hidden just because a typical hiding place is visible as I approach GZ.

 

But actually calling it an LPC (or guard rail cache, or park bench cache, etc.) when it isn't one seems to be like providing an encrypted hint that actually misdirects the seeker, rather than helping the seeker.

Link to comment

Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

If I call my cache a MIST must it be a micro in a spruce tree?

 

I don't think the title of a cache has to give away the location.

 

If the description says it is a micro in a spruce tree then that is wrong.

 

Cleaver?

 

I found one awhile ago that had "hidden among the trees" that was "among" the trees but was a fake rock on the ground...

 

Just like people need to look about 30' beyond GZ, they also need to not be hand fed the cache.

Link to comment

Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

If I call my cache a MIST must it be a micro in a spruce tree?

 

I don't think the title of a cache has to give away the location.

 

If the description says it is a micro in a spruce tree then that is wrong.

 

Cleaver?

 

I found one awhile ago that had "hidden among the trees" that was "among" the trees but was a fake rock on the ground...

 

Just like people need to look about 30' beyond GZ, they also need to not be hand fed the cache.

 

I didn't say that anyone should be hand fed the location. But intentionally misleading them is not clever. To say "hidden among the trees" is a far cry from say it is in a tree. I still say it is not clever.

Link to comment

The cache is a Little Purple Cache. I changed some stuff on the page, maybe now it is not such a misdirect. If people read the description(which I know not all do) then they will know that LPC in this case does not mean Lamp Post(or light pole) cache.

 

I have a few of these little purple caches that I plan to put out(uh oh, here come the nano bashers).

 

Better, but still not one I'd get a kick out of.

Link to comment

I placed a cache in a tree 4 feet from a light pole and called it Quick LPC PNG. Is that be too misleading? The purpose was to see if anyone would get out of their tunnel vision and just maybe look at the tree. Nothing special about the tree, I was just wondering. I already have a FTF hound disappointed in not finding it. They said they broadened their search, but I'm sure they just broadened it to other light poles. Should I not have named it as a LPC? There is a light pole there, the cache just ain't on it. I guess that is my real question.

 

 

Of course there is nothing wrong with what you did to it as a listing. I would agree, keep the purple part in the synopsis. See how close of attention people pay to the listing as a whole. If you get more DNF's, maybe raise the difficulty a little. Great job!!.

Link to comment

I placed a cache in a tree 4 feet from a light pole and called it Quick LPC PNG. Is that be too misleading? The purpose was to see if anyone would get out of their tunnel vision and just maybe look at the tree. Nothing special about the tree, I was just wondering. I already have a FTF hound disappointed in not finding it. They said they broadened their search, but I'm sure they just broadened it to other light poles. Should I not have named it as a LPC? There is a light pole there, the cache just ain't on it. I guess that is my real question.

 

 

IMHO most cachers like to find the caches. Deliberately tricking or using bad coords on purpose is a quick way to get your caches ignored and to earn the reputation of a lame cache owner.

 

Difficult and challenging caches can be fun, but only if you expect them to be difficult and challenging. If I've got 10 minutes to grab a cache and am looking for an easy one, I get annoyed if I find the cache does not match the description.

 

Misleading or ironic titles can be fun, as long as the description gives the cacher enough information. In this case your (Little Purple Cache) is a small hint, but increasing the difficulty rating would help people expand their horizons and make them feel like they were part of the fun of the misdirection, rather than the butt of a joke.

Edited by Triple Crown
Link to comment

I placed a cache in a tree 4 feet from a light pole and called it Quick LPC PNG. Is that be too misleading? The purpose was to see if anyone would get out of their tunnel vision and just maybe look at the tree. Nothing special about the tree, I was just wondering. I already have a FTF hound disappointed in not finding it. They said they broadened their search, but I'm sure they just broadened it to other light poles. Should I not have named it as a LPC? There is a light pole there, the cache just ain't on it. I guess that is my real question.

 

Here is the cache in question.

GC2AQWY

 

 

*Edit for grammar, since I know that is the most important thing on a forum(insert sarcasm).

 

I did one similar just the other day. I stopped looking at my GPS the minute I pulled into the parking lot, "knowing" right where the cache was. After a minute or so of tugging and twisting a LP 'skirt' that just wouldn't budge, I looked at my GPS. it showed about 30' away, pointing at a TREE, and there it was.

 

I wouldn't see a problem with what you are suggesting, as long as the coords are TIGHT.

Link to comment

I placed a cache in a tree 4 feet from a light pole and called it Quick LPC PNG. Is that be too misleading? The purpose was to see if anyone would get out of their tunnel vision and just maybe look at the tree. Nothing special about the tree, I was just wondering. I already have a FTF hound disappointed in not finding it. They said they broadened their search, but I'm sure they just broadened it to other light poles. Should I not have named it as a LPC? There is a light pole there, the cache just ain't on it. I guess that is my real question.

 

Here is the cache in question.

GC2AQWY

 

 

*Edit for grammar, since I know that is the most important thing on a forum(insert sarcasm).

 

I did one similar just the other day. I stopped looking at my GPS the minute I pulled into the parking lot, "knowing" right where the cache was. After a minute or so of tugging and twisting a LP 'skirt' that just wouldn't budge, I looked at my GPS. it showed about 30' away, pointing at a TREE, and there it was.

I know of a lamp post cache that the base doesn't lift but you can peek under and if you stick a knife under there you can push the thin container out.

Link to comment
Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

*Edit for grammar, since I know that is the most important thing on a forum(insert sarcasm).

Proper spelling is much more improtant than grammar.

Link to comment

I've seen clever misdirection used, but I'm not so sure this one is all that clever, even with the change to the cache page.

 

One, now long archived, cache that was infamous in my area spoke on the cache page about how the original contents being a hammer, a pair of pliers, and a screwdriver. Size was unspecified, but almost everyone was looking for an ammo box because of those contents. Turned out that those "tools" were from a doll house supply store, and the cache was a film cannister. Now, THAT was a fun "gotcha" moment!

 

Probably too many people have seen yours to change it now, but perhaps rather than "spelling it out for them" by literally explaining the meaning of LPC as Little Purple Cache, you could say, "Not every LPC is a skirt lifter. Expand your horizons and trust the coordinates.", and give them the fun of figuring out what LPC means when they find the little purple container. Just a thought.

Link to comment

I didn't see the original write-up, but I think your cache page is fine right now. The cache has only had one logged dnf so far. Leave it as it is and see what responses you get from cachers who go looking for it. Never mind what the forum thinks. Opinions here vary so much as to be wellnigh useless in the real world.

Link to comment
Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

*Edit for grammar, since I know that is the most important thing on a forum(insert sarcasm).

Proper spelling is much more improtant than grammar.

 

A cleaver hide could equate to a hatchet job! ;)

Link to comment
Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

*Edit for grammar, since I know that is the most important thing on a forum(insert sarcasm).

Proper spelling is much more improtant than grammar.

 

Improtant? ;)

Link to comment

I placed a cache in a tree 4 feet from a light pole and called it Quick LPC PNG. Is that be too misleading? The purpose was to see if anyone would get out of their tunnel vision and just maybe look at the tree. Nothing special about the tree, I was just wondering. I already have a FTF hound disappointed in not finding it. They said they broadened their search, but I'm sure they just broadened it to other light poles. Should I not have named it as a LPC? There is a light pole there, the cache just ain't on it. I guess that is my real question.

 

Here is the cache in question.

GC2AQWY

 

 

*Edit for grammar, since I know that is the most important thing on a forum(insert sarcasm).

 

I did one similar just the other day. I stopped looking at my GPS the minute I pulled into the parking lot, "knowing" right where the cache was. After a minute or so of tugging and twisting a LP 'skirt' that just wouldn't budge, I looked at my GPS. it showed about 30' away, pointing at a TREE, and there it was.

I know of a lamp post cache that the base doesn't lift but you can peek under and if you stick a knife under there you can push the thin container out.

 

;) Aha.... I came across one the other day that wouldn't lift so I looked around a nearby tree and couldn't find it. There were lots of muggles so I fled. I guess I'll reach up inside that LP and see what I can find. Thanks! :D

Link to comment
Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

*Edit for grammar, since I know that is the most important thing on a forum(insert sarcasm).

Proper spelling is much more improtant than grammar.

 

Improtant? ;)

 

Did you follow the link? The bespectacled one was only obeying Muphry's law.

Link to comment
Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

*Edit for grammar, since I know that is the most important thing on a forum(insert sarcasm).

Proper spelling is much more improtant than grammar.

 

Improtant? ;)

Click the link
Link to comment
Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

*Edit for grammar, since I know that is the most important thing on a forum(insert sarcasm).

Proper spelling is much more improtant than grammar.

 

Improtant? :P

Click the link

 

dadgum. I didn't realize it was a link. I thought it was just underlined for emphasis. B)

Link to comment

Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

The name says "Revenge of the LPC" The description says simply "Little Purple Cache".

 

If you read the page, interpret it correctly, you will know it is not under the lamp skirt. I think it is a clever cache.

 

As said about IMO.

Link to comment

Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

The name says "Revenge of the LPC" The description says simply "Little Purple Cache".

 

If you read the page, interpret it correctly, you will know it is not under the lamp skirt. I think it is a clever cache.

 

As said about IMO.

 

Um, this whole thread is deceiving. The cache page (and it sounds like even the original name of the cache) "lied" about it being an LPC, and most of the original post is referencing that. The cache page (and name as far as I can tell) has been revised to it's current form, which I doubt anyone would have a problem with. Not a cleaver thread. B)

Edited by TheWhiteUrkel
Link to comment

Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

The name says "Revenge of the LPC" The description says simply "Little Purple Cache".

 

If you read the page, interpret it correctly, you will know it is not under the lamp skirt. I think it is a clever cache.

 

As said about IMO.

 

and if you had read the entire thread and interpreted it correctly, you would have seen that the cache page was edited to say that only after "GOF's Sock Puppet" made that post.
Link to comment

Why would anyone think to look on the tree when the title basically says it is an LPC? Such misdirection does not, in my opinion, equate to cleaver.

 

The name says "Revenge of the LPC" The description says simply "Little Purple Cache".

 

If you read the page, interpret it correctly, you will know it is not under the lamp skirt. I think it is a clever cache.

 

As said about IMO.

 

and if you had read the entire thread and interpreted it correctly, you would have seen that the cache page was edited to say that only after "GOF's Sock Puppet" made that post.

 

Guilty as charged B)

 

I got confused.

Edited by 42at42
Link to comment

Well I like it.

I would enjoy finding it.

Really? After wasting time possibly vandalizing a LP only to find it's not there?

 

My opinion is that a lot of cachers will pry things off the lamp post and possibly electrocute themselves for a cache that is not there

Very bad idea

 

Back to the "I am not responsible for people not reading the cache page" discussion that's been hashed up a few times...

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...