+tarmacjohn Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 I recently published a series of caches, I had to move one of them due to it's proximity to cache GC167M6. This cache did not seem to exist and has not been published since. I was wondering at what point does a cache 'reserve' it's co-ords. Is it when you initially write the cache or is it when you submit it for review. Also, where has GC167M6 got to. Quote Link to comment
+Team Noodles Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 afaik the moment you create the cache page with it's coords you reserve that little circle. This of course can't last forever, if a spot has been 'claimed' for yonks it is not unreasonable to ask for said placer to either put up or shut up, imo. Quote Link to comment
+Cornell Finch Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 Yep, once you submit for review, it "reserves" the 0.1 mile radius. Of course, as you have discovered this is dependent on proximity. GC167M6 seems to be queued. Going by the GC Code I would guess that it's a cache that was created and then never sent for review by the creator, for whatever reason. Have a chat with one of the reviewers (the one that asked you to move your cache?) and they might be able to give you more info. Don't forget to include all the GC numbers! Quote Link to comment
+Birdman-of-liskatraz Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 (edited) Whoops! Edited June 21, 2010 by Birdman-of-liskatraz Quote Link to comment
+Delta68 Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 GC167M6 must date from October 2007! Bagsying the area for that long seems a bit excessive! Mark Quote Link to comment
+keehotee Posted June 22, 2010 Share Posted June 22, 2010 (edited) Yep, once you submit for review, it "reserves" the 0.1 mile radius. Of course, as you have discovered this is dependent on proximity. You don't need to submit for review to baggsy the space - leaving the Yes, this listing is active box unticked will mark the map. However, the reviewers have been known to request the owner of an unpublished cache to either complete the listing or remove it within a certain time if there is a conflict, so it doesn't necessarily last indefinitely... Edited June 22, 2010 by keehotee Quote Link to comment
+tarmacjohn Posted June 22, 2010 Author Share Posted June 22, 2010 Hmmmm, all very interesting. The reviewer stated how far away the offending cache was so I went and had a look. There was a very nice bridge in just the right place, looking underneath there was a box that I thought was a cache but under closer investigation it seems to be a box that opens by an electronic signal provided by a sensor built into the hand rail of the bridge. I gave it a prod and a poke (and a bit of a kick ) but no joy . So I was rather hoping that it was going to be a cache with a difference but from the age of the GC number it would appear not. Shame!!! Quote Link to comment
katowora Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 If a cache is temp disabled for more than a few weeks the reviewers will archive/threaten to archive it in or order to 'free up the area' Allowing an unpublished cache to hog a location for years is just ridiculous! Quote Link to comment
+drdick&vick Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 If people are going to create a 'holding' cache they should at least make the co-ords equate to the middle of the ocean. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.