+TheLoneWanderer Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 I went hiking around a nice lake trail with a bunch of caches along the way, and came across what I believed to be my very first nano! Or was it a micro? The cache container said micro, though a nano category hasn't been put in the database, though I've seen some nanos listed as "Other". The pen in the size comparison picture is pretty much standard pen size Quote Link to comment
jholly Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 nano or micro, both are micros. You found a bison tube. Here is a nano .... Quote Link to comment
+ras_oscar Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 Guidelines give size based on volume of container. Micro is officially the smallest size. although nano is widely used. I suspect nano has never officially been added due to the potential for size wars. If nano was added, someone would feel compelled to add an unofficial micro-nano, one half size of a nano. It's continue to deteriorate intil we had people hiding molecules. Quote Link to comment
+StarBrand Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 All nanos are by definition micro size caches. Some folks seem compelled to list them as 'other' but that (while allowed) is largely incorrect. What you found is a failrly standard micro. What some folks call a nano is actually smaller. Quote Link to comment
+Gitchee-Gummee Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 Most probably was listed as "other", because the CO did not want to qualify it as a micro. Quite a few do that. Whatever the case... that sure is a fine job of camo, dontcha think? Lotsa work involved with that one. Quote Link to comment
+niraD Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 That's a blinker. Not all nano-caches are blinkers. IMHO, the smaller Bison tubes are nano-caches, because they can hold only a custom fit log sheet. But that's my definition of a nano-cache. Others define them differently. Quote Link to comment
Northwoods Tom Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 That camo would blend perfectly in my iris flowers (right now for about 2 weeks). Sometimes the most obvious works quite well. Quote Link to comment
+d+n.s Posted June 4, 2010 Share Posted June 4, 2010 Most probably was listed as "other", because the CO did not want to qualify it as a micro. Quite a few do that. Whatever the case... that sure is a fine job of camo, dontcha think? Lotsa work involved with that one. If no one is muggling it the camo is fine right? Am I supposed to camo a bison tube in a field? I'm only asking for future reference. Quote Link to comment
+NatureGuy360 Posted June 4, 2010 Share Posted June 4, 2010 Most probably was listed as "other", because the CO did not want to qualify it as a micro. Quite a few do that. Whatever the case... that sure is a fine job of camo, dontcha think? Lotsa work involved with that one. If no one is muggling it the camo is fine right? Am I supposed to camo a bison tube in a field? I'm only asking for future reference. Camouflaging a geocache increases the challenge of finding it by a geocacher, and reduces the chances of finding it by a muggle. However, at the end of the day, if you place a geocache, then place it how you want to. It's your cache! Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted June 4, 2010 Share Posted June 4, 2010 As others pointed out, a nano is a micro. It's just a term for a very small micro. I don't believe most geocachers consider a Bison cylinder to in the nano category. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.