cache rating

[+The Trekbuddies]

should we have a rating system for caches? rated on condition , area , cache container, enjoyment of find etc , many people say their caching is about Quality not Quantity, but how do we know if say a cache in a wood, is in a well maintained woodland or a overgrown one full of litter?

now caches are going live at a fast rate there is so much more choice of whice ones to do, and we feel a rating system would be usefull especially when visiting a new area

[+Gitchee-Gummee]

There is already an active thread on this subject.

[+Ms.Scrabbler]

If you're thinking about cachers rating a find, I think we already have that by reading logs and maintenance requests.

 

If you were to rate your own hide you would always give it 100%.

[+L0ne.R]

If you were to rate your own hide you would always give it 100%.

 

I don't think I'd rate any of our cache hides 100%. Maybe a couple would be 80% (very scenic, fun or tricky hides) the rest are decent and get good feedback so I'd say they rate about 70/75% (nice locations, most have handcrafted/personalized logbooks, well maintained, nice walks, variety of cache types). It would be interesting to see whether others felt the same way. I would love a rating system.