+jazzmonster Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 Are there any approximate sizes to caches? I want to place a cache but I'm not sure whether to describe it as small or regular! Quote Link to comment
+reveritt Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 I would call any container with a volume of less than a half liter "small", less than a deciliter "micro", less than a milliliter "nano". Just my opinion. Quote Link to comment
+StarBrand Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 Yup the guidelines tell you: Cache SizesThese sizes apply to all caches that have a physical container. -Micro (35 mm film canister or smaller – less than approximately 3 ounces or .1 L – typically containing only a logbook or a logsheet) -Small (sandwich-sized plastic container or similar – less than approximately 1 quart or 1 L – holds trade items as well as a logbook) -Regular (plastic container or ammo can about the size of a shoebox) -Large (5 gallon/20 L bucket or larger) Quote Link to comment
GermanSailor Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 Are there any approximate sizes to caches? I want to place a cache but I'm not sure whether to describe it as small or regular! No problem at all, you actually have to check a box, saying that you read the guidelines. http://www.geocaching.com/about/guidelines.aspx#sizes Cache Sizes These sizes apply to all caches that have a physical container. * Micro (35 mm film canister or smaller – less than approximately 3 ounces or .1 L – typically containing only a logbook or a logsheet) * Small (sandwich-sized plastic container or similar – less than approximately 1 quart or 1 L – holds trade items as well as a logbook) * Regular (plastic container or ammo can about the size of a shoebox) * Large (5 gallon/20 L bucket or larger) Actually even less than a quart is "small". GermanSailor Quote Link to comment
+BigFurryMonster Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 * Micro (35 mm film canister or smaller – less than approximately 3 ounces or .1 L – typically containing only a logbook or a logsheet) I'm confused. Isn't an 'ounce' a measure of weight? We're determining volumes here. Quote Link to comment
+StarBrand Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 * Micro (35 mm film canister or smaller – less than approximately 3 ounces or .1 L – typically containing only a logbook or a logsheet) I'm confused. Isn't an 'ounce' a measure of weight? We're determining volumes here. Fluid onces - considered a measure of volume. Quote Link to comment
+jazzmonster Posted February 2, 2010 Author Share Posted February 2, 2010 Wow, fast replies, thank you! Apologies, I was looking at the wrong page. I looked here http://www.geocaching.com/about/cache_types.aspx Quote Link to comment
+modnar24 Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 (edited) Cache Sizes These sizes apply to all caches that have a physical container. * Micro (35 mm film canister or smaller – less than approximately 3 ounces or .1 L – typically containing only a logbook or a logsheet) * Small (sandwich-sized plastic container or similar – less than approximately 1 quart or 1 L – holds trade items as well as a logbook) * Regular (plastic container or ammo can about the size of a shoebox) * Large (5 gallon/20 L bucket or larger) I think a lot of confusion comes from the fact that you could fit 7 or 8 containers they describe as small in what is described as a regular sized cache. Many caches fall in between these two sizes and make it difficult (as the OP was suggesting) to label. It would be nice if they gave ranges as guidelines. It would take some of the guesswork out. M24 EDIT:quoted more then I needed... Edited February 2, 2010 by modnar24 Quote Link to comment
+NYPaddleCacher Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 * Micro (35 mm film canister or smaller – less than approximately 3 ounces or .1 L – typically containing only a logbook or a logsheet) I'm confused. Isn't an 'ounce' a measure of weight? We're determining volumes here. I"ll put it into "laymans" terms. A can of beer in typically 12 ounces. Imagine how big it would be if it was 1/4 full. That's three ounces. For those that have difficuly with math: Drink the beer, then with a vigorous motion hold the can in front of you and smash it on your forehead. The can will then be about the size that can hold 3 ounces of beer. Anything smaller than that would be considered a micro. Quote Link to comment
+StarBrand Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 ...I"ll put it into "laymans" terms. A can of beer in typically 12 ounces. Imagine how big it would be if it was 1/4 full. That's three ounces. For those that have difficuly with math: Drink the beer, then with a vigorous motion hold the can in front of you and smash it on your forehead. The can will then be about the size that can hold 3 ounces of beer. Anything smaller than that would be considered a micro. You need to copyright that. Quote Link to comment
GermanSailor Posted February 3, 2010 Share Posted February 3, 2010 I think a lot of confusion comes from the fact that you could fit 7 or 8 containers they describe as small in what is described as a regular sized cache. Many caches fall in between these two sizes and make it difficult (as the OP was suggesting) to label. It would be nice if they gave ranges as guidelines. It would take some of the guesswork out. No! What is confusing about: Less than a litre / quart (those are actually different sizes!) but bigger than a film canister = Small More than a litre / quart but less than 5 gallons / 20 litres (again, different measurments) = Regular I don't see any potential for confusion here! Just read an understand the guidelines. You actually have to confirm this in order to get a geocache reviewed. GermanSailor Quote Link to comment
+BigFurryMonster Posted February 3, 2010 Share Posted February 3, 2010 (edited) Fluid onces - considered a measure of volume. Right, thanks. I'll stick with the given 100 ml (can I recommend the metric system? it's really handy). I do observe caches in the field that are classified as Large, but are actually Regular by these guidelines. I think most cache owners tend to over-estimate the size of their (.. no jokes, please) ...caches a bit. Edited February 3, 2010 by BigFurryMonster Quote Link to comment
+modnar24 Posted February 3, 2010 Share Posted February 3, 2010 Less than a litre / quart (those are actually different sizes!) but bigger than a film canister = Small More than a litre / quart but less than 5 gallons / 20 litres (again, different measurments) = Regular I don't see any potential for confusion here! Just read an understand the guidelines. You actually have to confirm this in order to get a geocache reviewed. GermanSailor Here in lies the problem... When I read the guidelines, I don't see anything close to what you posted your translation as. I see that a small is a sandwhich sized container that holds about a quart, A regular is about the size of a shoebox or ammo can, and a large is 5 gallons or larger. My only suggestion was a numerical range that actually read just like you typed it. Understanding is open to interpretation. My understanding and your understanding can be completely different. M24 Quote Link to comment
Clan Riffster Posted February 3, 2010 Share Posted February 3, 2010 It would be nice if they gave ranges as guidelines. Cache Sizes These sizes apply to all caches that have a physical container. * Micro (35 mm film canister or smaller – less than approximately 3 ounces or .1 L – typically containing only a logbook or a logsheet) Range = 3 ounces to really, really small * Small (sandwich-sized plastic container or similar – less than approximately 1 quart or 1 L – holds trade items as well as a logbook) Range = 1 quart to 3 ounces * Regular (plastic container or ammo can about the size of a shoebox) Range = 4.9 gallons to 1 quart * Large (5 gallon/20 L bucket or larger) Range = 5 gallons to really, really big. Not perfect, but this should get you started. Quote Link to comment
+glacier_ice Posted February 3, 2010 Share Posted February 3, 2010 I"ll put it into "laymans" terms. A can of beer in typically 12 ounces. Imagine how big it would be if it was 1/4 full. That's three ounces. For those that have difficuly with math: Drink the beer, then with a vigorous motion hold the can in front of you and smash it on your forehead. The can will then be about the size that can hold 3 ounces of beer. Anything smaller than that would be considered a micro. So to get a good estimate, pull out a beer and drink half the can. If you can fit everything into the space, great. If not, drink more. If the can is empty, you may need a second can, just to be sure. Rinse and repeat. Eventually, almost like magic, you'll have two small caches on your hands to hide! Quote Link to comment
+GeoGeeBee Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 Here in lies the problem... When I read the guidelines, I don't see anything close to what you posted your translation as. I see that a small is a sandwhich sized container that holds about a quart, A regular is about the size of a shoebox or ammo can, and a large is 5 gallons or larger. My only suggestion was a numerical range that actually read just like you typed it. Understanding is open to interpretation. My understanding and your understanding can be completely different. The numerical range is there, in the guidelines. The guidelines say that a "small" is less than 1 quart. They say that "large" is 5 gallons or bigger. Therefore, any container that is bigger than a quart and less than 5 gallons must be "regular." Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.