+ecanderson Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I've had my Dakota 20 for about 10 days now, and I'm beginning to wonder if there's a new approach to the "accuracy" reading. My Summit HC settles a lot faster, and in side-by-side tests, I'd swear the Summit HC is using a radius figure and the Dakota a diameter. Seems my Dakota 20 produces "accuracy" results of about 2X the Summit. New algorithm? Actually less accurate? Less optimistic? I'm also in the process of doing some side-by-side tests of the reported current position between my two units. I'm concerned that I am seeing a difference of 0.003 in the N/S axis - that's 18 feet. Time to do some hard-core repeatability and accuracy measurements on these gadgets now that I have a pair to play with. Quote Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.