zwvirtual Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 (edited) I was looking at the Garmin HCX GPS and noticed that there's a Garmin Vista HCX and a Garmin Legend HCX. Can anyone tell me which is the better of the two, and why? Edited December 1, 2009 by zwvirtual Quote Link to comment
NordicMan Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Yep they're pretty much the same except the Vista HCx has a built-in magnetic compass and a barometric altimeter. Otherwise, identical Next question probably will be.. is the compass & altimeter worth the extra $'s? Personally I say yes the magnetic COMPASS is worth having but not so much for the altimeter. Quote Link to comment
Chrome Sushi Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 I bought the Vista and honestly I don't use the compass or altimeter that much Quote Link to comment
zwvirtual Posted December 1, 2009 Author Share Posted December 1, 2009 Here's another question: Why would the barometric altimeter even be needed if gps can determine altitude from the satellite readings? Quote Link to comment
NordicMan Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 The barometric altimeter is much more accurate than if just determining altitude via satellite triangulation. Altitude has always been the toughest value for a GPSr to derive. Technically the GPSr doesn't even need the magnetic compass because it can determine compass bearing all by itself, but only when you're moving. That's why I DO like the magnetic compass when Geocaching. I can stand in one spot and the thing still knows where North is Quote Link to comment
+Chrysalides Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 The barometric altimeter is much more accurate than if just determining altitude via satellite triangulation. Altitude has always been the toughest value for a GPSr to derive. I've always wondered - wouldn't a barometric barometer be accurate only if: 1. Air pressure remains static 2. You calibrate it to a known elevation How do you calibrate it? How accurate is it compared to the GPSr calculation? Quote Link to comment
+twolpert Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Once calibrated, it is more accurate than the GPSr itself. That's why it's there. But it's only as accurate as your calibration method. I don't know anything about the Vista HCX specifically. But in general, units with altimeters allow you to calibrate them to a known pressure or a known altitude. Or you can put them in "automatic" mode which means that they start with the GPSr altitude. In the latter case, it's really only good for measuring change in altitude, not absolute altitude (since the starting point is only as good as the GPSr, which isn't very good). Some units (again, don't know about the Vista HCx) also allow you to record pressure trends while the unit is "off". Some hard-core backcountry types use this feature overnight to watch for ambient pressure changes which might mean changes in the weather. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.