The number of cache's I've found is the number of logs I've written... not the number of caches.

[+DefaultGen]

I visited a cache I've already visited today, logged my new visit, and my cache number reflected that visit as a new cache I've found.

 

I realize this isn't something that probably happens often, but should I just not log visits to caches I've already been to?

[Motorcycle_Mama]

You should log the visit as NOTE and not as a FOUND IT.

[+fizzymagic]

Only log Found It logs for caches you haven't found. It would be nice to have a Visited log type, but a note will have to serve.

[+Cardinal Red]

I visited a cache I've already visited today, logged my new visit, and my cache number reflected that visit as a new cache I've found.

 

I realize this isn't something that probably happens often, but should I just not log visits to caches I've already been to?

 

As was already mentioned, you logged two found logs to the same cache. They will both show up in your count. But you can easily fix it. Just edit the second one to a WRITE NOTE log and the extra find will go away. Good photo record of the cache site during the revisit.

[+DefaultGen]

Thanks a lot guys.