+Dgwphotos Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 I'm curious why we need two threads on the subject. The other thread is for closed roads, this is for opened roads. Don't you understand the difference? Seriously, they probably could be combined. I kept trying, but the site has been so wonky this week with the upgrades that everytime I tried to get in to merge the two the forums were down. I've gotten the two merged now and changed the title so it covers both opening and closing of the roads/trails. Actually, the current wording of the thread title still sounds a bit clumsy. I think it should be Roads and Trails Status Reports. Quote Link to comment
+Allanon Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 I'm curious why we need two threads on the subject. The other thread is for closed roads, this is for opened roads. Don't you understand the difference? Seriously, they probably could be combined. I kept trying, but the site has been so wonky this week with the upgrades that everytime I tried to get in to merge the two the forums were down. I've gotten the two merged now and changed the title so it covers both opening and closing of the roads/trails. Actually, the current wording of the thread title still sounds a bit clumsy. I think it should be Roads and Trails Status Reports. You forgot "In my opinion"... Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted May 2, 2009 Author Share Posted May 2, 2009 (edited) I'm curious why we need two threads on the subject. The other thread is for closed roads, this is for opened roads. Don't you understand the difference? Seriously, they probably could be combined. I kept trying, but the site has been so wonky this week with the upgrades that everytime I tried to get in to merge the two the forums were down. I've gotten the two merged now and changed the title so it covers both opening and closing of the roads/trails. Actually, the current wording of the thread title still sounds a bit clumsy. I think it should be Roads and Trails Status Reports. You forgot "In my opinion"... In my opinion, as a writer and editor, it sounds fine. Clear and concise. Especially since that's the wording I suggested to Team Misguided. Back on topic...who's got some more spring updates?! Edited May 2, 2009 by hydnsek Quote Link to comment
+LandRover Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 Tinkham Road between exits 42 & 47 is closed because of last winter's storm damage Linky thing Quote Link to comment
+TotemLake Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 (edited) Puget Sound losing popular hiking trail 08:25 PM PDT on Friday, May 1, 2009 By GARY CHITTIM / KING 5 News OLYMPIA, Wash. - The Puget Sound is losing an extremely popular trail, but getting back 760 acres of valuable salt water marshlands. Managers at the Nisqually Wildlife Refuge say the Brown Farm Dike Trail is crowded today by hikers hoping to enjoy one of its last few days. The 5.5-mile hike takes hikers through incredible terrain packed with bird and wildlife viewing opportunities. It's an easy walk that attracts hikers of all levels and has produced bird photographs hanging on the walls of thousands of visitors. But when managers decided to pull the old agricultural dike that cut off the land from Puget Sound, they realized the trail would be lost to the returning tidewaters. Biologists say restoring those tidelands will give a giant boost the Sound's declining wild salmon population. Young salmon enjoy good feeding and protection in estuary marshlands. Most of those marshes around Puget Sound have been lost over the last 100 years. All is not lost for hikers. The refuge plans to build a boardwalk out over the restored tidal marsh that managers say will provide fantastic viewing opportunities. Edited May 2, 2009 by TotemLake Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted June 19, 2009 Author Share Posted June 19, 2009 Good intel from GeoRoo on potential bad change in access to Mt Persis and Mt Index. This may have already come up on here, so sorry if I'm a little out of touch. Longview Fibre has been granted an emergency road closure to gate the road at the turnoff to FS 62 at Hwy 2 near Index. Gate is still open as of yesterday, but could be closed at any time. This will all but kill any hiking or geocaching in the area. 7 caches isn't much, but it is a wonderful area to hike and it would be a shame to lose. My experience with road closures is once they are closed they rarely open again. If you wish to hike Mt Persis, or Index you'll have to walk an additional 10 miles of logging road and 2200 ft. elevation gain to reach the trail head. I've been in communication with Steve Tift (360-424-2014) the land manager for Longview and Barb Bussey (360-677-2414) Skykomish Ranger station and the main concern is the people shooting and the dumping of trash. The majority of the shooting occurs at a large sandpit, so it's more a knee jerk action that's happening here. If we can force the closure of the gate, then by all means let's do it is what I see happening. Steve is very willing to work with hikers, so there is a silver lining. In a good faith effort by hikers I'm organizing a clean up week end after next. June 27-28th. There is some garbage along the Mt Persis trail, but the majority is below in the valley and side spurs. I was up there the other day checking out how bad it's going to be and was surprised at how little I saw. Not the scary dump truck loads I was thinking. You can read about it here. Mt Persis Clean up You may have seen on the news the clean up effort at Lake Isabel last weekend by hikers and float plane people. That went really well, so I'm hoping to build on that effort while there's interest and everyone hasn't scattered 20 different directions for the summer. If you can help out that would be great. We have permission to spend the weekend there, so I'm going to be camping out for the weekend. Quote Link to comment
+LandRover Posted August 5, 2009 Share Posted August 5, 2009 (edited) Although the North Fork Snoqualmie Road is open it looks like all of the spur roads and trails have been temporarily closed by the Hancock Timber Company because of "extreme" fire danger. On a side note it does look thier working on replacing the bridge over Sunday Creek. Edited August 5, 2009 by LandRover Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted August 17, 2009 Author Share Posted August 17, 2009 (edited) King County just announced which parks it wants to close to balance the budget: King County wants to shutter 39 neighborhood parks. Article includes the list of parks. Edited August 17, 2009 by hydnsek Quote Link to comment
+Berta Nick Zoey Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 I'd like to see the total cost of fencing all of these parks off. Quote Link to comment
+WRASTRO Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 I'd like to see them cut more staff from the KC executive and council offices, then keep the parks open. Quote Link to comment
+Dgwphotos Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 (edited) I'd like to see the total cost of fencing all of these parks off. I doubt they will actually fence them off. I think it will be more like zero maintenance, and maybe park closed signs. I do notice that one of them is actually a park maintenance shop. (Five Mile Lake) Edited August 18, 2009 by Dwoodford Quote Link to comment
+WRASTRO Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 I'd like to see the total cost of fencing all of these parks off. I doubt they will actually fence them off. I think it will be more like zero maintenance, and maybe park closed signs. I do notice that one of them is actually a park maintenance shop. (Five Mile Lake) Not the entire park. From the KC website: "The 39 parks proposed for mothballing will remain open for use but will not be maintained. In December crews will fence playground equipment, lock and secure restrooms, post signs and lock gates in the 39 parks in potential annexation areas of Burien, Kent, Renton, Kirkland, Issaquah, Seattle, Federal Way, Redmond and SeaTac." Quote Link to comment
+Lightning Jeff Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 I doubt they will actually fence them off. I think it will be more like zero maintenance, and maybe park closed signs. Fenced or not, a closed sign probably means you're trespassing if you enter. That may or may not ever lead to citations (misdemeanor), but regardless, it's hard to see how we as a community could keep caches active in parks that are officially closed and officially, ostensibly, if not actually, off limits. Quote Link to comment
+The Jester Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 I doubt they will actually fence them off. I think it will be more like zero maintenance, and maybe park closed signs. Fenced or not, a closed sign probably means you're trespassing if you enter. That may or may not ever lead to citations (misdemeanor), but regardless, it's hard to see how we as a community could keep caches active in parks that are officially closed and officially, ostensibly, if not actually, off limits. Not sure if that's right. The last time they 'closed' parks you had the right to walk in and use them, just no services were provided. Quote Link to comment
+TotemLake Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 I doubt they will actually fence them off. I think it will be more like zero maintenance, and maybe park closed signs. Fenced or not, a closed sign probably means you're trespassing if you enter. That may or may not ever lead to citations (misdemeanor), but regardless, it's hard to see how we as a community could keep caches active in parks that are officially closed and officially, ostensibly, if not actually, off limits. Not sure if that's right. The last time they 'closed' parks you had the right to walk in and use them, just no services were provided. They didn't fence off the playground facilities the last time. Is this a lesson learned from the last time? IF so, then what else is going to be different? I think it's pure speculation until we hear something more defining on either side of the 'fence'. Quote Link to comment
+uxorious Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 One of the news reports I read had said the restrooms and other facilities (including playgrounds) would be closed. However, the article did say you would still be able to walk through the park and use it for whatever doesn't require maintenance. Of course now I can't find the article. Quote Link to comment
+uxorious Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 If the proposed cuts go through, the 39 parks would remain open but would not be maintained. That means the playgrounds would be fenced off and restrooms would be locked, Triplett said. I found it. This was a from the article on the KOMO news web site. Quote Link to comment
+WeightMan Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 If the proposed cuts go through, the 39 parks would remain open but would not be maintained. That means the playgrounds would be fenced off and restrooms would be locked, Triplett said. I found it. This was a from the article on the KOMO news web site. You can read the article here. It states fairly clearly: If the proposed cuts go through, the 39 parks would remain open but would not be maintained. That means the playgrounds would be fenced off and restrooms would be locked, Triplett said. Quote Link to comment
+Lightning Jeff Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 They didn't fence off the playground facilities the last time. Is this a lesson learned from the last time? IF so, then what else is going to be different? I think it's pure speculation until we hear something more defining on either side of the 'fence'. Yup. As for local news reporting, it is uniformly terrible. I guess we'll see what ends up getting closed off. My point is just that if an area is officially closed, I think that means closed to geocaches. Quote Link to comment
+Dgwphotos Posted August 19, 2009 Share Posted August 19, 2009 Apparently, it still has to go through the County Council, according to an article in the Seattle Times, and the next King County Exec could very well make changes. Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted November 18, 2009 Author Share Posted November 18, 2009 WSDOT has closed the usual suspects for the winter: The North Cascades Highway (Hwy 20) closed for the winter last Friday (Nov. 13) after 20 inches of new snow and avalanches. On Nov. 8, officials announced the winter closures of SR 410 over Chinook Pass and SR 123 over Cayuse Pass. Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted December 17, 2009 Author Share Posted December 17, 2009 From the WTA's Signpost blog, posted today: Good news for Middle Fork enthusiasts! The Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest opened the Middle Fork Snoqualmie River Road - FR 56 - to vehicular traffic last week. Winter flooding closed the road for the past year, blocking access to popular trailheads such as the Middle Fork Snoqualmie River and the Taylor River Trail to Otter Falls. Hikers have been out during the past week and report that the Taylor River Trail (#1002) is easily passable to Otter Falls and Marten Creek. The Upper Middle Fork Road remains closed past milepost 12.5 - just beyond the Middle Fork Campground and Taylor River Bridge. Repairs are scheduled for next summer. As usual, watch for huge potholes along the entire stretch of the Middle Fork Road. It's always an adventure. Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted January 19, 2010 Author Share Posted January 19, 2010 (edited) Looks like High on a Windy Hill and a couple of earthcaches are going to be inaccessible for a few weeks. (Source: Seattle Times, 1/19/10) Hurricane Ridge road closed after part of it slides away A 17-mile stretch of Hurricane Ridge Road at Olympic National Park is closed after a chunk of the road fell away in a landslide Monday afternoon. A slope below the road slid, destroying both travel lanes along a 100-foot section. The road is closed for at least four to six weeks just below the Heart O' the Hills entrance station at Olympic, about five miles south of Port Angeles. The road closure applies to all uses, even walking or bicycling, because the slide is still active. Soil is continuing to slump away, undercutting what little is left of the road. Park staff first saw something amiss with the road on Saturday, when road crews noticed cracks and slight slumping in the road's downhill lane north of Heart O' the Hills. The road was closed Monday because of high winds and white-out conditions at Hurricane Ridge — a good thing as it turned out, because the road failed that afternoon. The road is usually kept open Friday through Sunday throughout the winter to accommodate skiers, snowshoers and others who enjoy the popular winter recreation destination. The cause of the slide was heavy rain. This particular road has never slid before, Maynes said, but "we've had a lot of rain in the last week, and it's been a pretty wet winter generally, and the soil is completely saturated." Edited January 19, 2010 by hydnsek Quote Link to comment
+W7WT Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 (edited) Thanks for posting the information. The Virtual cache "High on a Windy Hill"is now Temporily unavailable Dick, W7WT Edited January 20, 2010 by W7WT Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted February 11, 2010 Author Share Posted February 11, 2010 In Washington state, proposed budget cuts could force the closure (or lack of maintenance) of popular trailheads such as Mt Si, Little Si, Rattlesnake, and Middle Fork Snoqualmie, according to news reports and WTA (Washington Trails Association). These are all DNR-managed lands, and DNR is being hard-hit by the proposed cuts. Considering the popularity of these particular trails, seems a bit of a scare tactic, however, WTA is actively involved in talking to legislators and lobbying for continued support of our trail systems. Read more. Quote Link to comment
+W7WT Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 Thanks for posting the information. The Virtual cache "High on a Windy Hill"is now Temporily unavailable Dick, W7WT The road to Hurricane Ridge will be open tomorrow 2-27-10. So the virtual cache "High on a Windy Hill" is now available. Dick, W7WT Quote Link to comment
+Lizzy Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 Looks like they've started clearing Highway 20 through the North Cascades this week. Opening day is coming early this year!! I might have to venture up there to see if I can be one of the first across. I heard something about a lady who brings homemade Cinnamon Rolls for the first people to go through the gates...mmmm (even though I don't need them! ) WSDOT SR 20 Info Quote Link to comment
+Lizzy Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 (edited) Darn double post. Edited March 24, 2010 by Lizzy Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted March 24, 2010 Author Share Posted March 24, 2010 Looks like they've started clearing Highway 20 through the North Cascades this week. Opening day is coming early this year!! I might have to venture up there to see if I can be one of the first across. I heard something about a lady who brings homemade Cinnamon Rolls for the first people to go through the gates...mmmm (even though I don't need them! ) WSDOT SR 20 Info Yippee! I would love to go with you if you decide to make the trek. I've heard about those cinnamon rolls, too. Quote Link to comment
+Barnabirdy(s) Posted April 3, 2010 Share Posted April 3, 2010 Looks like they've started clearing Highway 20 through the North Cascades this week. Opening day is coming early this year!! I might have to venture up there to see if I can be one of the first across. I heard something about a lady who brings homemade Cinnamon Rolls for the first people to go through the gates...mmmm (even though I don't need them! ) WSDOT SR 20 Info Yippee! I would love to go with you if you decide to make the trek. I've heard about those cinnamon rolls, too. The lady is Tootsie Clarke from Clarke Cabins and the Eatery in Marblemount. She has been doing this for years (more likely decades (or centuries?)) Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted May 13, 2010 Author Share Posted May 13, 2010 I just saw this very interesting notice on the Bus-Up 90 site: Snoqualmie Shuttle Service to Resume in Summer, 2010 GOOD NEWS!!! Washington State Parks has indicated that around mid-summer, 2010, the Cascade Tunnel under Snoqualmie Summit and the John Wayne Pioneer Trail will re-open to hiking and bicycle traffic. The tunnel and nearby trail were closed by washouts for the entire 2009 season. The State Legislature has also simplified regulations allowing us to restore shuttle service on the Bus-Up route, so we fully intend to resume operations between Cedar Falls/North Bend and Hyak/Summit areas once the trail is reopened. Please check back to this site for updated information as it becomes available. Thank you very much for your patience and support during our unfortunate hyatus from shuttle service. (Updated 4/5/10) Please note the part about the tunnel reopening - could it be?!?! They have the wrong name (Cascade Tunnel is at Stevens Pass) but if this is the Snoqualmie Tunnel - woo hoo! Quote Link to comment
+WeightMan Posted May 13, 2010 Share Posted May 13, 2010 I just saw this very interesting notice on the Bus-Up 90 site: Snoqualmie Shuttle Service to Resume in Summer, 2010 GOOD NEWS!!! Washington State Parks has indicated that around mid-summer, 2010, the Cascade Tunnel under Snoqualmie Summit and the John Wayne Pioneer Trail will re-open to hiking and bicycle traffic. The tunnel and nearby trail were closed by washouts for the entire 2009 season. The State Legislature has also simplified regulations allowing us to restore shuttle service on the Bus-Up route, so we fully intend to resume operations between Cedar Falls/North Bend and Hyak/Summit areas once the trail is reopened. Please check back to this site for updated information as it becomes available. Thank you very much for your patience and support during our unfortunate hyatus from shuttle service. (Updated 4/5/10) Please note the part about the tunnel reopening - could it be?!?! They have the wrong name (Cascade Tunnel is at Stevens Pass) but if this is the Snoqualmie Tunnel - woo hoo! Since the John Wayne Pioneer Trail is the one at Snoqualmie, the chances are good that The Tunnel Of Light will reopen. Good news, indeed. Too bad mid-summer is probably after July 4. Quote Link to comment
+TotemLake Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 Beaver dam breaks in Snoqualmie flooding North Fork Road SE. http://www.king5.com/news/local/Dam-breaks...e-95973279.html Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted June 18, 2010 Author Share Posted June 18, 2010 I just saw this very interesting notice on the Bus-Up 90 site: Snoqualmie Shuttle Service to Resume in Summer, 2010 GOOD NEWS!!! Washington State Parks has indicated that around mid-summer, 2010, the Cascade Tunnel under Snoqualmie Summit and the John Wayne Pioneer Trail will re-open to hiking and bicycle traffic. The tunnel and nearby trail were closed by washouts for the entire 2009 season. The State Legislature has also simplified regulations allowing us to restore shuttle service on the Bus-Up route, so we fully intend to resume operations between Cedar Falls/North Bend and Hyak/Summit areas once the trail is reopened. Please check back to this site for updated information as it becomes available. Thank you very much for your patience and support during our unfortunate hyatus from shuttle service. (Updated 4/5/10) Please note the part about the tunnel reopening - could it be?!?! They have the wrong name (Cascade Tunnel is at Stevens Pass) but if this is the Snoqualmie Tunnel - woo hoo! Since the John Wayne Pioneer Trail is the one at Snoqualmie, the chances are good that The Tunnel Of Light will reopen. Good news, indeed. Too bad mid-summer is probably after July 4. Apparently, the Bus-Up 90 folks were a bit too eager. Here's an update from WA State Parks: Snoqualmie Pass Tunnel (tunnel 50) is currently being addressed by Parks Development staff. If things go as planned that tunnel will be reopened to the public in the spring of 2011. It will take the entire 2010 construction season to complete this work. Renovation of tunnel 49, “Whittier Tunnel” in the area of Cabin Creek, and tunnel 49, in the area of Lake Easton, have been submitted in a request for the 2011-2013 budget. Efforts to reopen those tunnels will be dependent upon decisions related to that budget request. The soonest those tunnels might reopen to public use would be the spring of 2013. Joyce Riley Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission 360-902-8500 Quote Link to comment
+LandRover Posted July 7, 2010 Share Posted July 7, 2010 The Sunday Creek Bridge on the North Fork of the Snoqualmie River is in place and the road is now open beyond the bridge. Thank you for your email and interest in the Sunday Creek Bridge replacement project. The bridge was opened for all users on July 1st. The Contractor is doing final clean up work but the bridge is now open. Thank you for your patience with this project. Larry Jaramillo, P.E. Supervising Engineer Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted October 9, 2010 Author Share Posted October 9, 2010 (edited) From WTA's Signpost blog, Oct. 7: Here we go again. To comply with mandated budget cuts, Washington State Parks proposes mothballing six parks, including Squak Mountain, Federation Forest, Fort Ward, Peshastin Pinnacles, Tolmie and Flaming Geyser. ...The option to close these six parks was chosen over another one that would have mothballed 13 parks, so this situation could have been much worse. ...Why these parks? These were the six with the lowest percentage of revenue to expenses. That was the criteria, plain and simple. But only Flaming Geyser and Federation Forest will actually save the agency more than $100,000. The other four cost very little to keep open. Read more, including how you can help. Edited October 9, 2010 by hydnsek Quote Link to comment
+hydnsek Posted November 17, 2010 Author Share Posted November 17, 2010 From the Seattle Times, 11/15/10: Hikes on Mount Si and Tiger Mountain may soon cost you Hiking Mount Si, Tiger Mountain and other popular state-managed lands may soon require a paid user pass under a draft proposal by the state Department of Natural Resources. Anticipating the state's $4.8 billion deficit for the next two years, the department plans to present legislation next year to charge user fees. The proposal so far is to charge $40 for an annual pass and $10 for a day-use pass, said DNR spokesman Aaron Toso. The passes would be per person. The passes would cover activities on lands managed by both DNR and the Department of Fish and Wildlife. Already, hikers pay fees to use U.S. Forest Service and National Parks sites. Toso said the fees would help provide sustainable funding for outdoor recreation, including maintenance and enforcement. Some of the fees would also fund the trusts that own some of the lands, including one that pays for school construction costs. The advocacy group Washington Trails Association supports the idea of a fee system that's reasonable and noted that DNR-managed lands were threatened with closure last year, according to a story on its site. "It's our hope that DNR can keep critical landscapes open while charging a reasonable access fee to help pay for it," wrote WTA's Lauren Braden. Opinions differed on the group's Facebook page, with some people thinking $10 a hike is too expensive and that public lands should remain free of fees. Other people wrote it's time for hikers to help take care of natural resources. Quote Link to comment
+AndrewRJ Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 From the Seattle Times, 11/15/10: Hikes on Mount Si and Tiger Mountain may soon cost you Hiking Mount Si, Tiger Mountain and other popular state-managed lands may soon require a paid user pass under a draft proposal by the state Department of Natural Resources. Anticipating the state's $4.8 billion deficit for the next two years, the department plans to present legislation next year to charge user fees. The proposal so far is to charge $40 for an annual pass and $10 for a day-use pass, said DNR spokesman Aaron Toso. The passes would be per person. The passes would cover activities on lands managed by both DNR and the Department of Fish and Wildlife. Already, hikers pay fees to use U.S. Forest Service and National Parks sites. Toso said the fees would help provide sustainable funding for outdoor recreation, including maintenance and enforcement. Some of the fees would also fund the trusts that own some of the lands, including one that pays for school construction costs. The advocacy group Washington Trails Association supports the idea of a fee system that's reasonable and noted that DNR-managed lands were threatened with closure last year, according to a story on its site. "It's our hope that DNR can keep critical landscapes open while charging a reasonable access fee to help pay for it," wrote WTA's Lauren Braden. Opinions differed on the group's Facebook page, with some people thinking $10 a hike is too expensive and that public lands should remain free of fees. Other people wrote it's time for hikers to help take care of natural resources. Wow thats a stiff day rate. Quote Link to comment
+TotemLake Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 $40 for an annual pass and $10 for a day-use pass ... per person. This effectively closes the trails to most users when you consider families. Seems extreme to me. Quote Link to comment
+Lightning Jeff Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 $40 for an annual pass and $10 for a day-use pass ... per person. This effectively closes the trails to most users when you consider families. Seems extreme to me. Gotta wonder how this would be enforced. Not sure the last time I saw a DNR employee on DNR land - possibly never. (So it turns into one of those fees that only us law-abiding suckers pay. ) At any rate, I'm thinking this proposal is DOA in the new legislature. Quote Link to comment
+GrnXnham Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 The parking pass seems easier to enforce than a per-person pass. That way DNR could just go through the parking lot and look for passes rather than trying to catch people on the trails. The NW Forest Pass seems to work well in this way and it is reasonably priced at $30/year per car. This is good way of charging people because it encourages car-pooling when there is limited parking at many trail-heads. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.