Jump to content

"Population density" of caches


user13371

Recommended Posts

In another GPS related forum, someone mentioned there were 1122 caches within 10 miles of his home. I thought that was a huge number until I checked near my own home in Portland and found over a thousand.

 

How many caches are within 10 miles of your home?

 

Using "caches within 10 mile radius" as the standard, what place in the US (or the world) has the highest population density of caches?

Edited by lee_rimar
Link to comment

There are apparently 5585 caches within 10 miles of me, but that's without my own finds and hides.

 

Huh?

 

I put Passaic, NJ (which is what is showing in your profile) in and got 322 caches within 10 miles.

 

I've got 162 *current* caches within my home zipcode (14850). 25 of them are mine, I have found all of the others, plus a half dozen or so that are now archived.

Link to comment

There are apparently 5585 caches within 10 miles of me, but that's without my own finds and hides.

 

Huh?

 

I put Passaic, NJ (which is what is showing in your profile) in and got 322 caches within 10 miles.

 

I've got 162 *current* caches within my home zipcode (14850). 25 of them are mine, I have found all of the others, plus a half dozen or so that are now archived.

You know, I too was going to say something about that. :lol:

But instead I'll say, I think it would be a good idea for outrageous claims to be backed up with actual coords or zip code.

Link to comment

There are apparently 5585 caches within 10 miles of me, but that's without my own finds and hides.

 

Huh?

 

I put Passaic, NJ (which is what is showing in your profile) in and got 322 caches within 10 miles.

 

I've got 162 *current* caches within my home zipcode (14850). 25 of them are mine, I have found all of the others, plus a half dozen or so that are now archived.

You know, I too was going to say something about that. :lol:

But instead I'll say, I think it would be a good idea for outrageous claims to be backed up with actual coords or zip code.

 

As you pointed out there have been lots of threads like this before and from what I can tell there are a few areas in Southern California which have the highest cache densities. In the thread that you mentioned there were at the time of the posting almost 10,000 caches within a 40 mile radius. That's just a couple thousand short of the total number of caches in the state of New York. I live in a relatively low cache dense area. If I drive about 30 miles there are a couple of areas with a higher ratio, and if I extend my range to 80 miles or so a couple of other areas that are even more dense. Contrary to popular belief, New York City has relatively few caches. There are lots of places in the city where it's pretty difficult to get a decent signal.

Link to comment

Contrary to popular belief, New York City has relatively few caches. There are lots of places in the city where it's pretty difficult to get a decent signal.

 

Not sure that that's the reason for the low cache density in the city, although it is a contributing factor. That would account for fewer people with GPSrs. It's just a very tough place to hide caches! Millions of muggles.

Reminds me, I hae to try to celar Manhattan of caches again this year.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...