+GeoRon Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 It it against the license agreement for two geocachers to merge their unfound queries in order for them to find caches that they both need when going on an outing together? It looks like it is to me. Licensee shall not sell, rent, lease, sublicense, lend, assign, time-share, or transfer, in whole or in part, or provide access to the Data, Related Materials, any updates, or Licensee's rights under this Agreement to any third party whatsoever. Quote Link to comment
+Okiebryan Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 It is not a violation for both cachers to load their my finds PQ into ITATN. There is a feature on that site that will compare two PQs to do what you are asking. Quote Link to comment
Keystone Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 Yes, it's a license violation. Thanks for asking! Okiebryan has posted one solution that's compliant. Another is to create a bookmark list for the caches you want to find, and then ask your friend to review the list for caches they've already found. Once you've finalized the bookmark list, both of you can run a pocket query on it. Quote Link to comment
J.A.R.S. Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 It is not a violation for both cachers to load their my finds PQ into ITATN. There is a feature on that site that will compare two PQs to do what you are asking. What is ITATN? Sounds like something I might want to use. Quote Link to comment
Keystone Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 It's Not About the Numbers is a useful statistics site. It's often abbreviated "INATN" and in fact, "INATN.com" will also get you there. I'm sorry I didn't notice the typo in the earlier post. Quote Link to comment
+GeoRon Posted October 26, 2008 Author Share Posted October 26, 2008 (edited) Why would INATN be ok if another premium member is not ok as INATN is a third party. I know how to do it using GSAK so don't need INATN. Licensee shall not sell, rent, lease, sublicense, lend, assign, time-share, or transfer, in whole or in part, or provide access to the Data, Related Materials, any updates, or Licensee's rights under this Agreement to any third party whatsoever. Edited October 26, 2008 by GeoRon Quote Link to comment
jholly Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 Why would INATN be ok if another premium member is not ok as INATN is a third party. I know how to do it using GSAK so don't need INATN. Licensee shall not sell, rent, lease, sublicense, lend, assign, time-share, or transfer, in whole or in part, or provide access to the Data, Related Materials, any updates, or Licensee's rights under this Agreement to any third party whatsoever. Read the bottom of the INATN website, they are licensed to have the PQ's. It still might technically be a violation of the TOU to use GSAK, but I'm not a lawyer and I haven't slept in a Holiday Inn Express. Jim Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.