+FunkyNassau Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 Ok - so this is now the final version with my new formulas and so forth Background on the stats Population numbers and locations are from 2006 Census Cache numbers are based from the center of the city/town up to 9.9km .. 10km+ are not included in the count, and before you ask, having even as many as 10 caches on the "limit" will not change the numbers so drastically that your city/town will score better - you want your city/town to score better, place more caches There are an obscene number of caches on the East Coast of Canada and very little population - side note, there are like 6 or 7 of the top 10 hiders in Canada in the Maritime provinces (I am one of them) - this is why. If a missed a town with over 10k consult the census webpage, if it was not there - I did not use it My final formula for overall saturation is based on caches per capita, overall caches, overall population and some other factors to even the playing field for large population vs. small pops, etc, etc.. Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 22, 2008 Author Share Posted September 22, 2008 Top 3 Areas by Caches per Capita by province Town, Province, Population, Caches, Caches Per Capita AB Cold Lake AB 11,991 67 178.9701493 Canmore AB 12,039 43 279.9767442 Red Deer AB 82,772 238 347.7815126 BC Cranbrook BC 24,138 203 118.9064039 Port Alberni BC 25,297 143 176.9020979 Parksville BC 26,518 148 179.1756757 MB Portage la Prairie MB 20,494 44 465.7727273 Brandon MB 48,256 75 643.4133333 Thompson MB 13,593 12 1132.75 NB Fredericton NB 85,688 395 216.9316456 Bathurst NB 31,424 132 238.0606061 Moncton NB 126,424 464 272.4655172 NL Corner Brook NF 26,623 63 422.5873016 St. John's NF 181,113 201 901.0597015 Grand Falls-Windsor NF 13,558 8 1694.75 NS Sydney NS 105,928 267 396.7340824 Truro NS 45,077 96 469.5520833 Kentville NS 25,969 46 564.5434783 ON Cobourg ON 18,210 104 175.0961538 Port Hope ON 16,390 86 190.5813953 Ingersoll ON 11,760 46 255.6521739 PEI Summerside PE 16,153 27 598.2592593 Charlottetown PE 58,625 32 1832.03125 PQ Rouyn-Noranda PQ 39,924 183 218.1639344 Victoriaville PQ 48,893 154 317.487013 Rivirere-du-Loup PQ 24,570 73 336.5753425 SK North Battleford SK 17,765 37 480.1351351 Yorkton SK 17,438 34 512.8823529 Swift Current SK 16,533 25 661.32 North Whitehorse NT 22,898 47 487.1914894 Yellowknife YK 18,700 22 850 Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 22, 2008 Author Share Posted September 22, 2008 Top 5 caches per capita locations, 10k people min, 10km limit Cranbrook BC 24,138 203 118.9064039 Cobourg ON 18,210 104 175.0961538 Port Alberni BC 25,297 143 176.9020979 Cold Lake AB 11,991 67 178.9701493 Parksville BC 26,518 148 179.1756757 Top 5 caches per capita locations, 50k people min, 10km limit Fredericton NB 85,688 395 216.9316456 Moncton NB 126,424 464 272.4655172 Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu PQ 87,492 255 343.1058824 Red Deer AB 82,772 238 347.7815126 Sydney NS 105,928 267 396.7340824 Top 5 caches per capita locations, 100k people min, 10km limit Moncton NB 126,424 464 272.4655172 Sydney NS 105,928 267 396.7340824 Victoria ・ BC 330,088 629 524.782194 Sherbrooke PQ 186,952 312 599.2051282 Trois-Rivieres PQ 141,529 230 615.3434783 Top 5 caches per capita locations, 300k people min, 10km limit Victoria ・ BC 330,088 629 524.782194 Halifax NS 372,858 557 669.4039497 Quebec ・ PQ 715,515 505 1416.861386 Ottawa - Gatineau ON 1,130,761 707 1599.379066 Winnipeg MB 694,668 432 1608.027778 Top 5 caches per capita locations, 1mil people min, 10km limit Ottawa - Gatineau ON 1,130,761 707 1599.379066 Edmonton AB 1,034,945 588 1760.110544 Calgary ・ AB 1,079,310 561 1923.903743 Montreal PQ 3,635,571 670 5426.225373 Vancouver BC 2,116,581 294 7199.255102 Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 22, 2008 Author Share Posted September 22, 2008 Full List, Ranked by Most caches Per Capita 1 Cranbrook BC 24,138 203 118.9064039 2 Cobourg ON 18,210 104 175.0961538 3 Port Alberni BC 25,297 143 176.9020979 4 Cold Lake AB 11,991 67 178.9701493 5 Parksville BC 26,518 148 179.1756757 6 Port Hope ON 16,390 86 190.5813953 7 Williams Lake BC 18,760 89 210.7865169 8 Fredericton NB 85,688 395 216.9316456 9 Rouyn-Noranda PQ 39,924 183 218.1639344 10 Bathurst NB 31,424 132 238.0606061 11 Ingersoll ON 11,760 46 255.6521739 12 Dawson Creek BC 10,994 42 261.7619048 13 Moncton NB 126,424 464 272.4655172 14 Canmore AB 12,039 43 279.9767442 15 Courtenay BC 49,214 173 284.4739884 16 Campbell River BC 36,461 117 311.6324786 17 Victoriaville PQ 48,893 154 317.487013 18 Miramichi NB 24,737 77 321.2597403 19 Duncan BC 41,387 123 336.4796748 20 Rivirere-du-Loup PQ 24,570 73 336.5753425 21 Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu PQ 87,492 255 343.1058824 22 Red Deer AB 82,772 238 347.7815126 23 Joliette PQ 43,595 123 354.4308943 24 Midland ON 35,402 93 380.6666667 25 Petawawa ON 14,651 38 385.5526316 26 Timmins ON 42,997 111 387.3603604 27 Sydney NS 105,928 267 396.7340824 28 Corner Brook NF 26,623 63 422.5873016 29 Squamish BC 15,256 35 435.8857143 30 Campbellton NB 17,888 41 436.2926829 31 Nanaimo BC 92,361 206 448.3543689 32 Lachute PQ 11,832 26 455.0769231 33 Drummondville PQ 78,108 169 462.1775148 34 Portage la Prairie MB 20,494 44 465.7727273 35 Truro NS 45,077 96 469.5520833 36 Penticton BC 43,313 92 470.7934783 37 North Battleford SK 17,765 37 480.1351351 38 Whitehorse NT 22,898 47 487.1914894 39 Kenora ON 15,177 31 489.5806452 40 Wetaskiwin AB 11,673 23 507.5217391 41 Yorkton SK 17,438 34 512.8823529 42 Victoria ・ BC 330,088 629 524.782194 43 Kentville NS 25,969 46 564.5434783 44 Salmon Arm BC 16,205 28 578.75 45 Matane PQ 16,438 28 587.0714286 46 Collingwood ON 17,290 29 596.2068966 47 Summerside PE 16,153 27 598.2592593 48 Sherbrooke PQ 186,952 312 599.2051282 49 Dolbeau-Mistassini PQ 14,546 24 606.0833333 50 Baie-Comeau PQ 29,808 49 608.3265306 51 Trois-Rivieres PQ 141,529 230 615.3434783 52 Brandon MB 48,256 75 643.4133333 53 Saint John NB 122,389 190 644.1526316 54 Prince George BC 83,225 129 645.1550388 55 Swift Current SK 16,533 25 661.32 56 Halifax NS 372,858 557 669.4039497 57 Powell River BC 16,537 24 689.0416667 58 Quesnel BC 22,449 32 701.53125 59 Camrose AB 15,620 22 710 60 Saint-Georges PQ 31,364 43 729.3953488 61 Lethbridge AB 95,196 130 732.2769231 62 Vernon BC 55,418 75 738.9066667 63 Shawinigan PQ 56,434 76 742.5526316 64 Chilliwack BC 80,892 106 763.1320755 65 Terrace BC 18,581 24 774.2083333 66 Leamington ON 49,741 64 777.203125 67 New Glasgow NS 36,288 46 788.8695652 68 Kingston ON 152,358 187 814.7486631 69 Elliot Lake ON 11,549 14 824.9285714 70 Saskatoon SK 233,923 278 841.4496403 71 Yellowknife YK 18,700 22 850 72 Grande Prairie AB 71,868 80 898.35 73 St. John's NF 181,113 201 901.0597015 74 Saint-Hyacinthe PQ 55,823 61 915.1311475 75 Val-d'Or PQ 32,288 35 922.5142857 76 Thetford Mines PQ 26,107 27 966.9259259 77 Kamloops BC 92,882 96 967.5208333 78 Cowansville PQ 12,666 13 974.3076923 79 Abbotsford BC 159,020 163 975.5828221 80 Owen Sound ON 32,259 33 977.5454545 81 Sept-Iles PQ 27,827 28 993.8214286 82 Sarnia ON 88,793 89 997.6741573 83 Moose Jaw SK 33,360 32 1042.5 84 Medicine Hat AB 68,822 64 1075.34375 85 Guelph ON 127,009 116 1094.905172 86 Orillia ON 40,532 37 1095.459459 87 Amos PQ 17,918 16 1119.875 88 Barrie ON 177,061 158 1120.639241 89 Lloydminster SK 27,023 24 1125.958333 90 Thompson MB 13,593 12 1132.75 91 Rimouski PQ 46,807 41 1141.634146 92 Okotoks AB 17,145 15 1143 93 La Tuque PQ 15,293 13 1176.384615 94 Thunder Bay ON 122,907 103 1193.271845 95 Fort St. John BC 25,136 21 1196.952381 96 Regina SK 194,971 160 1218.56875 97 Granby PQ 68,352 55 1242.763636 98 Centre Wellington ON 26,049 20 1302.45 99 Alma PQ 32,603 24 1358.458333 100 Prince Albert SK 40,766 30 1358.866667 101 Saguenay PQ 151,643 110 1378.572727 102 Quebec ・ PQ 715,515 505 1416.861386 103 Pembroke ON 23,195 16 1449.6875 104 Stratford ON 30,461 21 1450.52381 105 Sault Ste. Marie ON 80,098 54 1483.296296 106 Prince Rupert BC 13,392 9 1488 107 Hawkesbury ON 12,267 8 1533.375 108 Kelowna BC 162,276 103 1575.495146 109 Ottawa - Gatineau ON 1,130,761 707 1599.379066 110 Winnipeg MB 694,668 432 1608.027778 111 Belleville ON 91,518 56 1634.25 112 Grand Falls-Windsor NF 13,558 8 1694.75 113 Bay Roberts NF 10,507 6 1751.166667 114 Edmonton AB 1,034,945 588 1760.110544 115 Charlottetown PE 58,625 32 1832.03125 116 St. Catharines - Niagara ON 390,317 211 1849.843602 117 Peterborough ON 116,570 63 1850.31746 118 Estevan SK 11,135 6 1855.833333 119 Calgary ・ AB 1,079,310 561 1923.903743 120 Sorel-Tracy PQ 48,295 23 2099.782609 121 North Bay ON 63,424 30 2114.133333 122 Kitchener ON 451,235 213 2118.474178 123 Sudbury ON 158,258 74 2138.621622 124 Oshawa ON 330,594 150 2203.96 125 Woodstock ON 35,480 14 2534.285714 126 Brantford ・ ON 124,607 48 2595.979167 127 Windsor ON 323,342 121 2672.247934 128 Hamilton ON 692,911 259 2675.332046 129 Edmundston NB 21,442 8 2680.25 130 Salaberry-de-Valleyfield PQ 39,672 13 3051.692308 131 Brockville ON 39,668 12 3305.666667 132 London ON 457,720 134 3415.820896 133 Tillsonburg ON 14,822 4 3705.5 134 Cornwall ON 58,485 11 5316.818182 135 Montreal PQ 3,635,571 670 5426.225373 136 Vancouver BC 2,116,581 294 7199.255102 137 Brooks AB 22,452 2 11226 138 Norfolk ON 62,563 5 12512.6 139 Toronto ON 5,113,149 205 24942.19024 Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 22, 2008 Author Share Posted September 22, 2008 Full List - Most Saturated Town/City in Canada, in order of largest saturation factor to least Again - this is based using my own formula which weights many population, per capita, overall caches and so forth, This says nothing about quality caches, etc, etc - It just tells you where to go to pick up some serious numbers... 1 Moncton NB 2 Fredericton NB 3 Victoria ・ BC 4 Halifax NS 5 Sydney NS 6 Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu PQ 7 Sherbrooke PQ 8 Red Deer AB 9 Nanaimo BC 10 Trois-Rivieres PQ 11 Saskatoon SK 12 Courtenay BC 13 Rouyn-Noranda PQ 14 Drummondville PQ 15 Victoriaville PQ 16 Saint John NB 17 Ottawa - Gatineau ON 18 Quebec ・ PQ 19 St. John's NF 20 Kingston ON 21 Cranbrook BC 22 Edmonton AB 23 Winnipeg MB 24 Parksville BC 25 Joliette PQ 26 Duncan BC 27 Calgary ・ AB 28 Bathurst NB 29 Port Alberni BC 30 Abbotsford BC 31 Campbell River BC 32 Lethbridge AB 33 Prince George BC 34 Timmins ON 35 Montreal PQ 36 Barrie ON 37 Regina SK 38 St. Catharines - Niagara ON 39 Vancouver BC 40 Truro NS 41 Hamilton ON 42 Kitchener ON 43 Midland ON 44 Chilliwack BC 45 Penticton BC 46 Cobourg ON 47 Guelph ON 48 Toronto ON 49 Kamloops BC 50 Williams Lake BC 51 Oshawa ON 52 Miramichi NB 53 Saguenay PQ 54 Thunder Bay ON 55 Brandon MB 56 Sarnia ON 57 Grande Prairie AB 58 Shawinigan PQ 59 London ON 60 Kelowna BC 61 Port Hope ON 62 Vernon BC 63 Rivirere-du-Loup PQ 64 Corner Brook NF 65 Windsor ON 66 Leamington ON 67 Medicine Hat AB 68 Saint-Hyacinthe PQ 69 Cold Lake AB 70 Baie-Comeau PQ 71 Sudbury ON 72 Whitehorse NT 73 Kentville NS 74 Portage la Prairie MB 75 Peterborough ON 76 Granby PQ 77 New Glasgow NS 78 Belleville ON 79 Sault Ste. Marie ON 80 Saint-Georges PQ 81 Campbellton NB 82 Ingersoll ON 83 Canmore AB 84 Brantford ・ ON 85 Dawson Creek BC 86 North Battleford SK 87 Petawawa ON 88 Rimouski PQ 89 Squamish BC 90 Orillia ON 91 Yorkton SK 92 Val-d'Or PQ 93 Owen Sound ON 94 Quesnel BC 95 Moose Jaw SK 96 Collingwood ON 97 Kenora ON 98 Charlottetown PE 99 Matane PQ 100 Salmon Arm BC 101 Prince Albert SK 102 Sept-Iles PQ 103 North Bay ON 104 Thetford Mines PQ 105 Summerside PE 106 Lachute PQ 107 Swift Current SK 108 Terrace BC 109 Powell River BC 110 Lloydminster SK 111 Alma PQ 112 Dolbeau-Mistassini PQ 113 Wetaskiwin AB 114 Yellowknife YK 115 Sorel-Tracy PQ 116 Camrose AB 117 Stratford ON 118 Fort St. John BC 119 Centre Wellington ON 120 Amos PQ 121 Cornwall ON 122 Pembroke ON 123 Woodstock ON 124 Okotoks AB 125 Salaberry-de-Valleyfield PQ 126 Norfolk ON 127 Elliot Lake ON 128 Brockville ON 129 Cowansville PQ 130 La Tuque PQ 131 Thompson MB 132 Edmundston NB 133 Prince Rupert BC 134 Hawkesbury ON 135 Grand Falls-Windsor NF 136 Brooks AB 137 Bay Roberts NF 138 Estevan SK 139 Tillsonburg ON Quote Link to comment
+TrimblesTrek Posted September 22, 2008 Share Posted September 22, 2008 Your "caches per capita" numbers don't make sense to me. Example: 85 Guelph ON 127,009 116 1094.905172 By my calculation: 116 caches / 127009 people = 0.0009133 caches per capita. You seem to have inverted the calculation. "per capita" is Latin meaning "for each head" (or for each person) Your numbers are showing people per cache, not caches per person. Maybe "people per cache" needs a cool new Latin phrase. How about populum per cachita. Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 23, 2008 Author Share Posted September 23, 2008 Yes, the numbers are indicating people per cache as opposed to caches per person, but as either calculation will bring the same results in terms of ordering, and it's much neater to show a whole number vs. 0.0009133 is it not? "Per capita" is a fairly generic term - it was done this way to make it easier to read Your "caches per capita" numbers don't make sense to me. Example: 85 Guelph ON 127,009 116 1094.905172 By my calculation: 116 caches / 127009 people = 0.0009133 caches per capita. You seem to have inverted the calculation. "per capita" is Latin meaning "for each head" (or for each person) Your numbers are showing people per cache, not caches per person. Maybe "people per cache" needs a cool new Latin phrase. How about populum per cachita. Quote Link to comment
+dragonflys Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Can see where I live now, Halifax, which is on a penisula having a serious disadvantage over say where I was from, Moncton, which is surrounded by woods. Congrats Fredericton. It is an awesome city. Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 23, 2008 Author Share Posted September 23, 2008 Actually, the center point of halifax I took was close to the bridges, thus Dartmouth is included - The census counts HRM, not Halifax... no disadvantage Moncton is surrounded by 50% swamp, not woods (immediately north and south of Moncton are woods) Fredericton is surrounded by woods But as the stats show, Moncton is the most saturated place in Canada - not by much, only a 3% variance from Moncton to Freddy - Oddly, Hali & Sydney both rank almost the same for saturation coverage only at about a 6% variance off Freddy Stats don't lie.. they just tell their own story Can see where I live now, Halifax, which is on a penisula having a serious disadvantage over say where I was from, Moncton, which is surrounded by woods. Congrats Fredericton. It is an awesome city. Quote Link to comment
POWRcacher Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Just an fyi it's Whitehorse, YT and Yellowknife, NWT. Quote Link to comment
+dragonflys Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 of course the big giant Bedford Basin and Bedford Magazine ignored. Just saying Actually, the center point of halifax I took was close to the bridges, thus Dartmouth is included - The census counts HRM, not Halifax... no disadvantage Moncton is surrounded by 50% swamp, not woods (immediately north and south of Moncton are woods) Fredericton is surrounded by woods But as the stats show, Moncton is the most saturated place in Canada - not by much, only a 3% variance from Moncton to Freddy - Oddly, Hali & Sydney both rank almost the same for saturation coverage only at about a 6% variance off Freddy Stats don't lie.. they just tell their own story Can see where I live now, Halifax, which is on a penisula having a serious disadvantage over say where I was from, Moncton, which is surrounded by woods. Congrats Fredericton. It is an awesome city. Quote Link to comment
+res2100 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Interesting stats, however Toronto does not have 5million+ people...there's only 2,503,281 people in Toronto based on the 2006 census. So I assume the 5million+ also includes all of the cities and towns around Toronto like Oakville, Burlington, Halton Hills, Milton, Brampton, Mississauga, Pickering, Ajax, etc, since they are all missing from the list. I'ld be curious to know how these rank. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_1...a_by_population Also, what do you use as the center of town? City Hall postal code? Quote Link to comment
+TrimblesTrek Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_1...a_by_population Also, what do you use as the center of town? City Hall postal code? Hmmm yes.. lots of differences between your numbers and the wiki list linked by Res. And I would agree...the standard for determining the centre of the city would be the city hall address (or postal code one would assume) Still not sure what enlightenment can be gained by knowing how many people per cache there are in any given town though. And cache saturation is meaningless...ever been to a place like Erie, Pa... where there's yet another stupid micro tucked under a lamppost every couple hundred metres. Utterly ridiculous. Your stats would be more meaningful to me if I had an idea of how many Regular caches there were in a given area. I don't and won't hunt micros unless I'm really, really bored. IMHO Gc.com should be providing all these stats anyway. They have all the data available to crunch. Quote Link to comment
+Juicepig Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Interesting stats, however Toronto does not have 5million+ people...there's only 2,503,281 people in Toronto based on the 2006 census. So I assume the 5million+ also includes all of the cities and towns around Toronto like Oakville, Burlington, Halton Hills, Milton, Brampton, Mississauga, Pickering, Ajax, etc, since they are all missing from the list. I'ld be curious to know how these rank. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_1...a_by_population Also, what do you use as the center of town? City Hall postal code? expecially since there are not 5 million people within 10km of City center Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 23, 2008 Author Share Posted September 23, 2008 Answering people: res2100: Yes, The census numbers I used are from the Census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/d...GK=1&RPP=50 Thus giving me numbers from split towns/cities - thus giving for example Toronto 5mil+ - However I kept the 10km limit for consistancy - Center of downtown is starting point POWRcacher: That was a typo Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 23, 2008 Author Share Posted September 23, 2008 I could have enlarged the limits for Census metropolitan areas (CMAs) (like Toronto, Vancouver and Ottawa), and kept the census agglomerations separate, however that would be another undertaking all together... something for next month maybe - It would require recentering all CMAs to a rough center to ensure maximum coverage, however some centers would not rise up too much in the "standings" due to population density anywho... Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 23, 2008 Author Share Posted September 23, 2008 As I mentioned in the last post with the saturation numbers, This says nothing about quality caches, It just tells you where to go to pick up some serious numbers... I did this for my own curiosity and for those who like stats - My curiosity is satisfied, thus at least ONE person was "enlightened" by it... Still not sure what enlightenment can be gained by knowing how many people per cache there are in any given town though. And cache saturation is meaningless...ever been to a place like Erie, Pa... where there's yet another stupid micro tucked under a lamppost every couple hundred metres. Utterly ridiculous. Your stats would be more meaningful to me if I had an idea of how many Regular caches there were in a given area. I don't and won't hunt micros unless I'm really, really bored. IMHO Gc.com should be providing all these stats anyway. They have all the data available to crunch. Quote Link to comment
+Fish Below The Ice Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 res2100: Yes, The census numbers I used are from the Census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/d...GK=1&RPP=50 Thus giving me numbers from split towns/cities - thus giving for example Toronto 5mil+ - However I kept the 10km limit for consistancy - That really makes no sense at all. Here's a list of the areas included in the Toronto CMA: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/d...;O=A&RPP=25. Bradford and West Gwillimbury are over 55km from downtown Toronto, but their populations are counted in the 5.1million total. On the other hand, 10km from city hall won't even get you as far as the 401, and will include roughly 1/4 of the actual area of Toronto. So with the numerator grossly inflated and the denominator grossly deflated, I guess it's not surprising that Toronto has the lowest cache density in the country. dave Quote Link to comment
+Keith Watson Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_1...a_by_population Also, what do you use as the center of town? City Hall postal code? Hmmm yes.. lots of differences between your numbers and the wiki list linked by Res. And I would agree...the standard for determining the centre of the city would be the city hall address (or postal code one would assume) Still not sure what enlightenment can be gained by knowing how many people per cache there are in any given town though. And cache saturation is meaningless...ever been to a place like Erie, Pa... where there's yet another stupid micro tucked under a lamppost every couple hundred metres. Utterly ridiculous. Your stats would be more meaningful to me if I had an idea of how many Regular caches there were in a given area. I don't and won't hunt micros unless I'm really, really bored. IMHO Gc.com should be providing all these stats anyway. They have all the data available to crunch. As of April 2008 Most Caches 1 Ontario 2 Quebec 3 British Columbia 4 Alberta 5 Nova Scotia 6 New Brunswick 7 Manitoba 8 Newfoundland 9 Saskatchewan 10 Prince Edward Island 11 Yukon 12 Northwest Territories 13 Nunavut Cache Density By Area (Best chance at finding a cache) 1 Prince Edward Island 2 Nova Scotia 3 New Brunswick 4 Ontario 5 British Columbia 6 Alberta 7 Quebec 8 Newfoundland 9 Manitoba 10 Saskatchewan 11 Yukon 12 Northwest Territories 13 Nunavut Per Capita (Most nuts about caching) 1 New Brunswick 2 Nova Scotia 3 Prince Edward Island 4 Yukon 5 Newfoundland 6 British Columbia 7 Manitoba 8 Alberta 9 Northwest Territories 10 Quebec 11 Saskatchewan 12 Ontario 13 Nunavut Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 24, 2008 Author Share Posted September 24, 2008 AGAIN - this was done ACROSS THE COUNRTY, every CMA is effected by the same principles Montreal Numbers include all these: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/d...R=0&CMA=462 Vancouver ones include: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/d...R=0&CMA=933 what it means is that the center core of the CMA of Toronto is not saturated with caches, the point is, Toronto CMA may have a lot of caches, and maybe more then some other centers, but they are spread out over too wide an area to be considered saturated - let me put it to you another way If you use the google map feature on the center of Toronto and pan out a little, between Mississauga, Scarb & Vaughn specifically, then are less then 500 caches - Now try that with Ottawa or Victoria - the cache/map system will tap out before you get to the 5km level Regardless of that, and even if I used 2mil population, Toronto is nowhere near the other areas in canada for saturation, there are just not enough placed caches to count, even if I increase the radius of 10km Saturation is being able to head to an area, and potentially pick up over 150 caches in one day without flinching - KNOWING that most would be boring drive-bys That really makes no sense at all. Here's a list of the areas included in the Toronto CMA: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/d...;O=A&RPP=25. Bradford and West Gwillimbury are over 55km from downtown Toronto, but their populations are counted in the 5.1million total. On the other hand, 10km from city hall won't even get you as far as the 401, and will include roughly 1/4 of the actual area of Toronto. So with the numerator grossly inflated and the denominator grossly deflated, I guess it's not surprising that Toronto has the lowest cache density in the country. dave Quote Link to comment
+ElectroQTed Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Saturation is being able to head to an area, and potentially pick up over 150 caches in one day without flinching - KNOWING that most would be boring drive-bys Wouldn't caches per area be a better indication of that type of saturation? The number of people per cache as per your stats can be an indicator that there are some very active hiders in the area or there are a lot of hiders in the area or a combination of both. If I want to find a bunch of caches in a day, I'll head for a spot that has a lot of caches - the number of people per cache wouldn't have any bearing on this choice. Keith Watson's lists show this in a better way, albeit, for much larger areas. Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 24, 2008 Author Share Posted September 24, 2008 You're looking at two different lists and interpreting them as the same.. Caches per person list is population based, however this is skewed to a small town with 11k people and one active cacher who hides 60 caches makes a very high caches:person ratio The second large list I posted based on saturation actually works in tandem with Keith's list, the saturation level of an area takes into consideration the amount of caches a given area holds, and weights it so that smaller centers which may have a higher cache:person ratio are placed lower on the list vs. places which have larger overall numbers Take a look at the google cache maps on gc.com at the top 10 saturated places on the big list, you trip over caches in all those places On a side note, Never thought something I did for fun would appear so confusing and "useless" to some people - next time I do something I think would be interesting for others to see I'll keep it at my local association's forum rather then sharing it and apparently needing to constantly justify all the work it did.... Wouldn't caches per area be a better indication of that type of saturation? The number of people per cache as per your stats can be an indicator that there are some very active hiders in the area or there are a lot of hiders in the area or a combination of both. If I want to find a bunch of caches in a day, I'll head for a spot that has a lot of caches - the number of people per cache wouldn't have any bearing on this choice. Keith Watson's lists show this in a better way, albeit, for much larger areas. Quote Link to comment
+Landsharkz Posted September 25, 2008 Share Posted September 25, 2008 On a side note, Never thought something I did for fun would appear so confusing and "useless" to some people - next time I do something I think would be interesting for others to see I'll keep it at my local association's forum rather then sharing it and apparently needing to constantly justify all the work it did.... FunkyNassau - I love these stats - especially since Victoria, BC made it onto one of your lists . We had a Cache Machine here this past weekend and I heard that it was the shortest route with the most caches in the history of this fellow's cache machines (6+ years I think). We were in Fredericton this summer and we'd sure like to go back again because it 'felt like' there were a lot of caches - now you've shown us that our initial perception was correct. Thank you and keep up the good work! I used to work in stats - it's nice to see them being applied to geocaching. Quote Link to comment
+res2100 Posted September 25, 2008 Share Posted September 25, 2008 On a side note, Never thought something I did for fun would appear so confusing and "useless" to some people - next time I do something I think would be interesting for others to see I'll keep it at my local association's forum rather then sharing it and apparently needing to constantly justify all the work it did.... Your stats ARE interesting and I'd like to see more. When I commented on Toronto, I simply was hoping to see Toronto and the surrounding area broken down properly into their respective cities\towns. I'ld like to see you use these numbers and town names listed here from the census: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_1...a_by_population Not based on any scientific data or anything, I surprisingly always found that Toronto was lacking in caches compared to many other cities, so it's no surprise at all for Toronto to be ranked really low. Toronto really isn't that dense when it comes to caches. However, I always thought of Hamilton and Burlington to be the most densest areas for caching. These are just my own personal perceptions based on the areas where we found ourselves caching in (or not caching in). Quote Link to comment
+FunkyNassau Posted September 27, 2008 Author Share Posted September 27, 2008 I can rework my formulas based on that list - I think the 10km radius is still a good yardstick, especially as that give us 314 square KM to work within for caches With those new numbers it would break down the larger centers (i.e. breaking Mississauga out of the Toronto CMA) Give me some time ... I should be able to retool to the new data as my the look of Hurricane Kyle I'll have some rain to get in the way of caching this weekend in the Maritimes I'ld like to see you use these numbers and town names listed here from the census: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_1...a_by_population Not based on any scientific data or anything, I surprisingly always found that Toronto was lacking in caches compared to many other cities, so it's no surprise at all for Toronto to be ranked really low. Toronto really isn't that dense when it comes to caches. However, I always thought of Hamilton and Burlington to be the most densest areas for caching. These are just my own personal perceptions based on the areas where we found ourselves caching in (or not caching in). Quote Link to comment
+dragonflys Posted September 28, 2008 Share Posted September 28, 2008 One suggestion for the Halifax calculation is to use the urban component of 282,924 instead of 372,679. The popualtion of the entire municipality encomapsses 5,577 square kilometres which is 10% of NS and roughly the size of PEI. Just a suggestion. Quote Link to comment
+Cedar Grove Seekers Posted September 29, 2008 Share Posted September 29, 2008 I can rework my formulas based on that list - I think the 10km radius is still a good yardstick, especially as that give us 314 square KM to work within for caches Considering that you are looking at # people per cache, then your 10km radius is a little arbitrary. For example, Toronto is larger than a 10km radius, so you are not getting all the caches but you are still counting the entire population of Toronto in the # people/cache stat. Conversely, some of your other locations are much smaller than a 10km radius so you are attributing caches that are outside their boundary to a population that is within the boundary. Quote Link to comment
+TrimblesTrek Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 I can rework my formulas based on that list - I think the 10km radius is still a good yardstick, especially as that give us 314 square KM to work within for caches Considering that you are looking at # people per cache, then your 10km radius is a little arbitrary. For example, Toronto is larger than a 10km radius, so you are not getting all the caches but you are still counting the entire population of Toronto in the # people/cache stat. Conversely, some of your other locations are much smaller than a 10km radius so you are attributing caches that are outside their boundary to a population that is within the boundary. I'm not really sure what the number of people have to do with this anyway. Just because a city has 2500, 25000, 250000 or 1000000 people is pretty irrelevant to cache density. Cache density is usually thought of in terms of number of caches per sq km or some such measure. If these stats were based on an area calculation it would give a much more accurate measure of where you could go to get the most caching bang for your buck. Does the source you used for your city populations also provide the city area? Quote Link to comment
+Bullfrog Eh-Team Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 Let's hear it for the 'WGS' (Wilberforce and Greater Surroundings) - the only authorized and authentic 'Geocaching Capital of Canada'. They have lots of AREA, and just the right enthusiastic POPULATION !!! And for those seeking more 'bang for your buck' - just check out their deer hunting this fall, while you're geocaching. Sometimes rural folk rule !! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.