+Boyscout64 Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 Ok I have seen this sig item in a few caches in the Northern Illinois area, its 3 small skulls on a strand of plastic line. Whose is it? Quote Link to comment
+markandsandy Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 Ok I have seen this sig item in a few caches in the Northern Illinois area, its 3 small skulls on a strand of plastic line. Whose is it? Wouldn't 'Who's were they?' be more grammatically correct? Sorry, I couldn't resist. Quote Link to comment
stryder717 Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 you would get a better response if you posted in the regional section of the forums. Quote Link to comment
+flask Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 (edited) Ok I have seen this sig item in a few caches in the Northern Illinois area, its 3 small skulls on a strand of plastic line. Whose is it? Wouldn't 'Who's were they?' be more grammatically correct? Sorry, I couldn't resist. no, but "WHOSE they were" would be. Edited September 8, 2008 by flask Quote Link to comment
+markandsandy Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 Ok I have seen this sig item in a few caches in the Northern Illinois area, its 3 small skulls on a strand of plastic line. Whose is it? Wouldn't 'Who's were they?' be more grammatically correct? Sorry, I couldn't resist. no, but "WHOSE they were" would be. I feel so ashamed. I'm the one who is always complaining about things like that, and I got it wrong. I know better:( OK, write 100 times... WHOSE were they? WHOSE were they? WHOSE were they? WHOSE were they? ... Quote Link to comment
stryder717 Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 Ok I have seen this sig item in a few caches in the Northern Illinois area, its 3 small skulls on a strand of plastic line. Whose is it? Wouldn't 'Who's were they?' be more grammatically correct? Sorry, I couldn't resist. no, but "WHOSE they were" would be. I feel so ashamed. I'm the one who is always complaining about things like that, and I got it wrong. I know better:( OK, write 100 times... WHOSE were they? WHOSE were they? WHOSE were they? WHOSE were they? ... hahahahaha Quote Link to comment
+Bolingbrook Joe Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 I believe that is a signature item for Corp Of Discovery. Quote Link to comment
+Buggheart Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 Wouldn't it be "to whom do they belong?" LOL Sorry, couldn't resist. It would be totally cool to find little skulls in a cache. That would make my day. Quote Link to comment
+markandsandy Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 Wouldn't it be "to whom do they belong?" LOL Sorry, couldn't resist. It would be totally cool to find little skulls in a cache. That would make my day. In that case, it would be 'To whom DID they belong?' Quote Link to comment
+blb9556 Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 If the skulls are attached then you should be fine. If it is a human skull find the cache and get out to your car and call 911. I have found a few caches that are halloween themed and have these sort of things in them. Fake skull= Nothing to wory about. Real=big problem ! Quote Link to comment
+Buggheart Posted September 8, 2008 Share Posted September 8, 2008 Wouldn't it be "to whom do they belong?" LOL Sorry, couldn't resist. It would be totally cool to find little skulls in a cache. That would make my day. In that case, it would be 'To whom DID they belong?' Ayup. Or maybe "by whom were they stashed/placed". Sure would love to see a pic of the little skulls. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.