+AeroMechAZ Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Not sure why new Virtual Caches aren't being accepted any more. True, there are several in my area, but there's also lots that could be added and still be interesting to the casual visitor/cacher in this area. Lots of history here. Quote Link to comment
+AHOLLYS Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Not sure why new Virtual Caches aren't being accepted any more. True, there are several in my area, but there's also lots that could be added and still be interesting to the casual visitor/cacher in this area. Lots of history here. You can use Waymarking.com for that now. There are tons there. Quote Link to comment
+tozainamboku Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Not sure why new Virtual Caches aren't being accepted any more. True, there are several in my area, but there's also lots that could be added and still be interesting to the casual visitor/cacher in this area. Lots of history here. link Quote Link to comment
+crevis79 Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I am cool with the idea of Waymarking, but don't do it because I don't think the stats count at geocaching.com Maybe the powers that be could keep the separate websites, but allow the numbers to compile. I know I tried to do a virtual during the conversion to Waymarking. It was the home were TV was invented. No cache was able to be placed, just a cool spot. Just an Idea Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.