+Renegade Knight Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 Which would be more useful in the audit log? A time stamp of the last visit by the cacher? A time samp of the first visit by the cacher? Right now I believe it's the first visit but could be wong Link to comment
+Corey Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 I might actually prefer to have visits by the same user not be grouped... Link to comment
+TheAprilFools Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 I would think only the first find log should be considered. Subsequent find logs should considered notes only Link to comment
+TheAprilFools Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 (edited) Duplicate post Edited May 28, 2008 by Blanston12 Link to comment
+Corey Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 (edited) I would think only the first find log should be considered. Subsequent find logs should considered notes only It's not the Found it log... we're talking about the "audit log" you can see if you own a members-only cache. It shows who viewed your cache page. Edited May 28, 2008 by qwerty56 Link to comment
+Miragee Posted May 28, 2008 Share Posted May 28, 2008 There is a time stamp after the Last Visit. That seems useful. I don't see a need for one after the First Visit, although that might be interesting for those people who saw the cache the very first day. Link to comment
Recommended Posts