+Piglit9 Posted September 2, 2007 Share Posted September 2, 2007 I would be a D. Don't see any reason not to use past logs if you are having trouble finding the cache. It could have been moved slightly from the original location by a recent finder, could have been a bit off in coords originally or it might be a tough spot for the GPS. But then again I rarely carry my Palm anymore after sitting on two on past hikes! When I do carry the Palm, just the past 5 logs are in there. I bet Piglet9 is a B.... Correct!, It just seems odd to me that they would be necessary to find a cache, considering I quite often have to wait for my caching partner to find them as I have already found them and gone after more interesting things... Bunnies, lizzards and birds! So in all technical terms I would be a B. Quote Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.