Cooptroop5 Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't a traditional cache in a big container or ammo box, and not a film canister? Quote Link to comment
+wimseyguy Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 You are wrong. A traditional cache is simply one located at the posted coords. Size doesn't matter. Quote Link to comment
Cooptroop5 Posted July 5, 2007 Author Share Posted July 5, 2007 You are wrong. A traditional cache is simply one located at the posted coords. Size doesn't matter. OK, thanks Quote Link to comment
+lacazg Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 (edited) A traditional cache is just a cache that you enter the coordinates of the cache and you go to the cache size is not the factor that determines the type. Micros, like film canisters and bison tubes still count as a traditional cache, they aren't nearly as fun as regular sized caches. If you look under the name of the cache owner on the cache page it will tell you the size so you don't have to be upset with by finding micros. Edited July 5, 2007 by lacazg Quote Link to comment
Cooptroop5 Posted July 5, 2007 Author Share Posted July 5, 2007 A traditional cache is just a cache that you enter the coordinates of the cache and you go to the cache size is not the factor that determines the type. Micros, like film canisters and bison tubes still count as a traditional cache, they aren't nearly as fun as regular sized caches. If you look under the name of the cache owner on the cache page it will tell you the size so you don't have to be upset with by finding micros. Thanks alot, I just thought that if the picture shows a ammo can, then that is what they would be... I will check the size from now on. Quote Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 A traditional cache is just a cache that you enter the coordinates of the cache and you go to the cache size is not the factor that determines the type. Micros, like film canisters and bison tubes still count as a traditional cache, they aren't nearly as fun as regular sized caches. If you look under the name of the cache owner on the cache page it will tell you the size so you don't have to be upset with by finding micros. ??? Quote Link to comment
+Lotho Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Yeah, probably a common assumption =D And who decided micros arent as fun? My faveorite cache ever found was a micro and although ive only found 40 its still quite something. All these micro haters need to move on! Quote Link to comment
+Renegade Knight Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 ...All these micro haters need to move on! While I defend the right of people to place Micro's and lame caches in general. The reason I do is for variety. The same variety that we need in caching to keep creativity alive. Micro Haters, Woodland Livers, Urban Slag Specialists, Technical Hide Specialists, Quirky Spot finders all are needed to keep this community full of creativity and vibrancy. I hate to admit it but even the Whiners have a place...but hopefully far away. Quote Link to comment
+lacazg Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 The micros I have found have all been drive-bys which take about half a brain to find. Quote Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 (edited) The micros I have found have all been drive-bys which take about half a brain to find.Interesting. I've found that, in general, micros are somewhat harder to find than regular-sized caches. In general, It's pretty darn easy to find that ammo can sitting under the pile-o-sticks. I'm not sure how much of a brain is used to find either one. Probably a teeny-tiny percentage, I'm sure. Edited July 5, 2007 by sbell111 Quote Link to comment
+BlueDeuce Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 From the cache search page. Cache Types Traditional Cache This is the original cache type consisting, at a bare minimum, a container and a log book. Normally you'll find a tupperware container, ammo box, or bucket filled with goodies, or smaller container ("micro cache") too small to contain items except for a log book. The coordinates listed on the traditional cache page is the exact location for the cache. Quote Link to comment
+wimseyguy Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Micro Haters, Woodland Livers, Urban Slag Specialists, Technical Hide Specialists, Quirky Spot finders all are needed to keep this community full of creativity and vibrancy. Never had woodland liver, but I don't like calves liver nor chicken liver. I doubt I'd like WL either. Quote Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Micro Haters, Woodland Livers, Urban Slag Specialists, Technical Hide Specialists, Quirky Spot finders all are needed to keep this community full of creativity and vibrancy.Never had woodland liver, but I don't like calves liver nor chicken liver. I doubt I'd like WL either. I kinda like the occasional chunk of liver, properly prepared. I'm sure that bunny and bambi livers would taste just fine. Quote Link to comment
+Team Crime Scene Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 You are wrong. A traditional cache is simply one located at the posted coords. Size doesn't matter. Quote Link to comment
+Team LaLonde Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 Micro Haters, Woodland Livers, Urban Slag Specialists, Technical Hide Specialists, Quirky Spot finders all are needed to keep this community full of creativity and vibrancy.Never had woodland liver, but I don't like calves liver nor chicken liver. I doubt I'd like WL either. I kinda like the occasional chunk of liver, properly prepared. I'm sure that bunny and bambi livers would taste just fine. mmmmm. . .pass the gravy. . . Quote Link to comment
CoyoteRed Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 The micros I have found have all been drive-bys which take about half a brain to find.Interesting. I've found that, in general, micros are somewhat harder to find than regular-sized caches. In general, It's pretty darn easy to find that ammo can sitting under the pile-o-sticks. I'm not sure how much of a brain is used to find either one. Probably a teeny-tiny percentage, I'm sure. I think you missed the qualifier of "I have found" and thusly his statement could very well be correct and irrefutable. Additionally, he mentioned drive-bys, which depending on punctuation, could also mean they were easy to find either by them being drive-bys or drive-bys in general being easy to find. So, I don't see the reason for you to argue the veracity of his statement which, for him, is correct. Of course, that could easily change once he comes up against an evil micro. Then both halves will be needed. Quote Link to comment
+Knight2000 Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 The micros I have found have all been drive-bys which take about half a brain to find. You have only found 6 micros. Some may be mindless and easy. Some are quite challenging and fun. Quote Link to comment
+martinell Posted July 5, 2007 Share Posted July 5, 2007 The micros I have found have all been drive-bys which take about half a brain to find.Interesting. I've found that, in general, micros are somewhat harder to find than regular-sized caches. In general, It's pretty darn easy to find that ammo can sitting under the pile-o-sticks. I'm not sure how much of a brain is used to find either one. Probably a teeny-tiny percentage, I'm sure. I think you missed the qualifier of "I have found" and thusly his statement could very well be correct and irrefutable. Additionally, he mentioned drive-bys, which depending on punctuation, could also mean they were easy to find either by them being drive-bys or drive-bys in general being easy to find. So, I don't see the reason for you to argue the veracity of his statement which, for him, is correct. Of course, that could easily change once he comes up against an evil micro. Then both halves will be needed. Such as the hollow bolt, or pill-sized bit of rust stuck by magnet under a slide. GRRRRRRRR - (My favorite type of micro hide) But what does this have to do with the OP's question which asked for clarification about cache sizes and did not ask about whether or not micros are fun? Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 The micros I have found have all been drive-bys which take about half a brain to find.Interesting. I've found that, in general, micros are somewhat harder to find than regular-sized caches. In general, It's pretty darn easy to find that ammo can sitting under the pile-o-sticks. I'm not sure how much of a brain is used to find either one. Probably a teeny-tiny percentage, I'm sure. Maybe you haven't searched for the right ammo box. Quote Link to comment
+Blaidd-Drwg Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 I've been told "Size does matter". Quote Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 The micros I have found have all been drive-bys which take about half a brain to find.Interesting. I've found that, in general, micros are somewhat harder to find than regular-sized caches. In general, It's pretty darn easy to find that ammo can sitting under the pile-o-sticks. I'm not sure how much of a brain is used to find either one. Probably a teeny-tiny percentage, I'm sure. Maybe you haven't searched for the right ammo box. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.