+rbennitt Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 There is a huge sign posted "No Trespassing" but I had to get the bug out of there to move it on its way before the cache is archived. My question is, should I just email the publisher or should I email geocaching.com to get this cache archived? The only way to the cache is around the fence (where I busted my butt). The URL to the sign is http://www.geo-irc.net/images/100_0002.JPG Let me know what you all think please. Quote
+mtn-man Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 I would recommend a "Should Be Archived" note on the cache page. That will get to the reviewer. You can also write the contact address too. Quote
+Urubu Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 There is a huge sign posted "No Trespassing" but I had to get the bug out of there to move it on its way before the cache is archived. My question is, should I just email the publisher or should I email geocaching.com to get this cache archived? The only way to the cache is around the fence (where I busted my butt). The URL to the sign is http://www.geo-irc.net/images/100_0002.JPG Let me know what you all think please. Hey! I recognize that site! Too bad, but if the sign looks more than temporary, you definitely need to log a "should be archived" As for going to get it anyway, I understand the temptation (I really, really do...) but it would probably be better for our hobby if cachers respected signs like that. Quote
+Knight2000 Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 There is a huge sign posted "No Trespassing" but I had to get the bug out of there to move it on its way before the cache is archived. What i don't understand is why you had a strong desire to get the bug? Was it yours? Even if the cache is archived the owner would still have to go get the cache i would think. Its their responsibility. If you would have been caught it would look bad for you, the hider, and geocaching in general. Dont always assume that it will be archived just because there is a sign. If no one says anything some people just keep logging it and some will even post in their logs that they saw the sign(s). Confuses the heck out of me, but it happens. Also- are you sure that the sign applies to the cache? For instance could you get to the cache from another direction where it isnt on private property and the hider had permission? Its a tough situation to be in. If you say anything in log it most likely will create problems between local cachers. I hate those type of situations. Hope your butt is ok. Quote
+Totem Clan Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 What i don't understand is why you had a strong desire to get the bug? Was it yours? Even if the cache is archived the owner would still have to go get the cache i would think. Its their responsibility. If you would have been caught it would look bad for you, the hider, and geocaching in general. Unfortunately it doesn't work that way many times. Many times such caches are abandoned. In fact I'm going out this weekend to recover just such a cache. I would hope that somebody we be considerate enough to recover a cache if my TB was in it. It may not be their cache, but some of us are considerate of others. Quote
+Knight2000 Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 Unfortunately it doesn't work that way many times. Many times such caches are abandoned. In fact I'm going out this weekend to recover just such a cache. I would hope that somebody we be considerate enough to recover a cache if my TB was in it. It may not be their cache, but some of us are considerate of others. I don't think this issue has much to do with being considerate of others TB(s). The OP didn't say that cache was abandoned. If a cache was abandoned and you knew that to be the case and the log said for the next visitor to retreive it, thats a different story. Even if you thought it was abandoned, i would think you should find out more info before removing it. But i wouldn't go take someone else's active cache just because i thought it should be there. That would be a little presumptuous. Quote
+Totem Clan Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 I don't think this issue has much to do with being considerate of others TB(s). The OP didn't say that cache was abandoned. If a cache was abandoned and you knew that to be the case and the log said for the next visitor to retreive it, thats a different story. Even if you thought it was abandoned, i would think you should find out more info before removing it. But i wouldn't go take someone else's active cache just because i thought it should be there. That would be a little presumptuous. We aren't talking about the cache. We are talking about the TB. And yes, a lot more often than you may think, when a cache is archived the owner will just leave it there. Getting the TB was good thing. He was trying to be nice. That is something he should be thanked for, not scolded for. Quote
+Harry Dolphin Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 Dont always assume that it will be archived just because there is a sign. If no one says anything some people just keep logging it and some will even post in their logs that they saw the sign(s). Confuses the heck out of me, but it happens. Also- are you sure that the sign applies to the cache? For instance could you get to the cache from another direction where it isnt on private property and the hider had permission? Its a tough situation to be in. If you say anything in log it most likely will create problems between local cachers. I hate those type of situations. Hope your butt is ok. Curious, I'm agreeing with knight2000! Oh, well. The cache seems to be located in Appalachicola National Forest. In a rather large area. Some approaches might be fenced off. We only have OP's complaint to go by. I've seen "No Trespassing" signs with hiking trails on the other side! Since none of the other cache finders have registered a complaint, or even mentioned the signs (several even mention the hiking trails), I have to wonder about OP's complaint. Maybe bypass the sewage tratment plant, and park at the trail head? Sunno. Not enough to go on here. Quote
+Knight2000 Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 We aren't talking about the cache. We are talking about the TB. And yes, a lot more often than you may think, when a cache is archived the owner will just leave it there. Getting the TB was good thing. He was trying to be nice. That is something he should be thanked for, not scolded for. Well i thought you were referring to removing the cache and TB. There are many things i could say but i think nothing positive will come out of it so i wont say it, and then you wont reply about what i say. I will say this though- i would think hard about breaking the law for a $6 TB. Yes, many factors are involved in this and every situation. Quote
nonaeroterraqueous Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 I know of a nice little area that's full of trails and ponds. It's surrounded by a chain-link fence with "No Trespassing" signs, even though it's open to the public every day. I think they just want people to come through the main entrance, not enter wherever they want. Eh, forget it, that probably doesn't even relate. Quote
+VeryLost Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 Even if the cache is archived the owner would still have to go get the cache i would think. Its their responsibility. If you would have been caught it would look bad for you, the hider, and geocaching in general. So, if the cache owner went instead, how is that any different in practical terms? Is he not just as likely to be caught as rbennitt, who was simply trying to help a stranger? Quote
+Knight2000 Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 I know of a nice little area that's full of trails and ponds. It's surrounded by a chain-link fence with "No Trespassing" signs, even though it's open to the public every day. I think they just want people to come through the main entrance, not enter wherever they want. Eh, forget it, that probably doesn't even relate. I think it may in this instance. Maybe it was just the route that the OP took. Very cool point. Quote
+rbennitt Posted May 2, 2007 Author Posted May 2, 2007 There is a huge sign posted "No Trespassing" but I had to get the bug out of there to move it on its way before the cache is archived. What i don't understand is why you had a strong desire to get the bug? Was it yours? Even if the cache is archived the owner would still have to go get the cache i would think. Its their responsibility. If you would have been caught it would look bad for you, the hider, and geocaching in general. Dont always assume that it will be archived just because there is a sign. If no one says anything some people just keep logging it and some will even post in their logs that they saw the sign(s). Confuses the heck out of me, but it happens. Also- are you sure that the sign applies to the cache? For instance could you get to the cache from another direction where it isnt on private property and the hider had permission? Its a tough situation to be in. If you say anything in log it most likely will create problems between local cachers. I hate those type of situations. Hope your butt is ok. The description mentions that the fence is open at certain times so I am assuming that that is the only way in. Now the fences are locked permanently--No access! As for the bug, I just wanted to move it in case the does end up being archived. If not, then that is good too! I am a LEO, so if I were caught I am sure that I would have received no punishment, so it wouldn't look bad for "geocaching in general". Thanks for all of your responses. Quote
+Knight2000 Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 So, if the cache owner went instead, how is that any different in practical terms? Is he not just as likely to be caught as rbennitt, who was simply trying to help a stranger? Anyone could be caught. And i wasnt fautling the OP for wanting to help. I just wondered why he felt he had to get the bug at that particular time. The cache in question is visited frequently. What i meant was that if the listing was archived (meaning in the future, after his visit/log is complete) then i would think that the responsible cache placer who in this case is active would remove the cache and he could take care of it. This way efforts wouldnt be duplicated. Maybe the owner wouldnt go get it. Maybe the cache is fine where it is and the OP took the wrong route in. Maybe it should be archived. Lots of maybes- i was just thinking along the lines of crossing that bridge when its time. Quote
+rbennitt Posted May 2, 2007 Author Posted May 2, 2007 So, if the cache owner went instead, how is that any different in practical terms? Is he not just as likely to be caught as rbennitt, who was simply trying to help a stranger? Anyone could be caught. And i wasnt fautling the OP for wanting to help. I just wondered why he felt he had to get the bug at that particular time. The cache in question is visited frequently. What i meant was that if the listing was archived (meaning in the future, after his visit/log is complete) then i would think that the responsible cache placer who in this case is active would remove the cache and he could take care of it. This way efforts wouldnt be duplicated. Maybe the owner wouldnt go get it. Maybe the cache is fine where it is and the OP took the wrong route in. Maybe it should be archived. Lots of maybes- i was just thinking along the lines of crossing that bridge when its time. I will go back tomorrow and see if there is any other possible way to get to this cache. Quote
+Knight2000 Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 I will go back tomorrow and see if there is any other possible way to get to this cache. Please dont go because of this thread. I was just bringing up possibilities. It very well may need archived. If you want to go to help future cachers that would be nice though. Quote
+Knight2000 Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 (edited) I will go back tomorrow and see if there is any other possible way to get to this cache. Just dont drop off any TBs there! Edited May 2, 2007 by knight2000 Quote
+Vinny & Sue Team Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 There is a huge sign posted "No Trespassing" but I had to get the bug out of there to move it on its way before the cache is archived. What i don't understand is why you had a strong desire to get the bug? Was it yours? Even if the cache is archived the owner would still have to go get the cache i would think. Its their responsibility. If you would have been caught it would look bad for you, the hider, and geocaching in general. Dont always assume that it will be archived just because there is a sign. If no one says anything some people just keep logging it and some will even post in their logs that they saw the sign(s). Confuses the heck out of me, but it happens. Also- are you sure that the sign applies to the cache? For instance could you get to the cache from another direction where it isnt on private property and the hider had permission? Its a tough situation to be in. If you say anything in log it most likely will create problems between local cachers. I hate those type of situations. Hope your butt is ok. The description mentions that the fence is open at certain times so I am assuming that that is the only way in. Now the fences are locked permanently--No access! As for the bug, I just wanted to move it in case the does end up being archived. If not, then that is good too! I am a LEO, so if I were caught I am sure that I would have received no punishment, so it wouldn't look bad for "geocaching in general". Thanks for all of your responses. Around here in Maryland, and even moreso in nearby WV, both of which have pretty relaxed trespass laws to start with, the police departments and sheriff's offices have told me time and time again that even if they catch someone inside an area that is clearly marked "No Trespassing", the main thing that they consider is the circumstances (i.e., are you carrying burglar's tools or a gun or a can of spray paint?) and intent. And, they have told me that at least 90% of the time, if there was obviously no ill intent involved, they would not file charges and would not even pay the matter much attention; these conversations came about as I researched permissions issues for some pretty wild extreme caches. I still prefer, personally, never to pass Posted/No Trespassing signs, but I suspect that even if the OP had been "caught" inside the posted fenced area, nothing adverse would have come to pass. And yes, I agree that if all access routes to the cache hide spot are now marked "No Trespassing", the cache should be archived. Quote
+rbennitt Posted May 2, 2007 Author Posted May 2, 2007 I am not going because of this thread. I would actually like to see this cache remain active so I am going to see if there are other ways in. Quote
+Renegade Knight Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 There is a huge sign posted "No Trespassing" but I had to get the bug out of there to move it on its way before the cache is archived. My question is, should I just email the publisher or should I email geocaching.com to get this cache archived? The only way to the cache is around the fence (where I busted my butt). The URL to the sign is http://www.geo-irc.net/images/100_0002.JPG Let me know what you all think please. First email the cache owner. They may know something that you don't. The SBA log is a slap in the face akin to going over someones head instead of dealing with a problem directly. Quote
+Renegade Knight Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 Is that a River in the background? If so few if any river fronts are private without special permits. The access to the river may be private for 100 miles in any direction, but the riverfront itself... Quote
+thedeadpirate Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 There is a huge sign posted "No Trespassing" but I had to get the bug out of there to move it on its way before the cache is archived. My question is, should I just email the publisher or should I email geocaching.com to get this cache archived? The only way to the cache is around the fence (where I busted my butt). The URL to the sign is http://www.geo-irc.net/images/100_0002.JPG Let me know what you all think please. I've done that cache. It is a travel bug hotel located off of a walking path in a nice park. That sign is new though. From the picture, you approached the cache from the shortest way in which requires you either traverse the dam or wade through some quick water. I wouldn't recommend that and can definitely see why it would now be posted. The proper way in requires a bit longer walk, but is completely legal access from a park. Quote
+thedeadpirate Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 The description mentions that the fence is open at certain times so I am assuming that that is the only way in. Now the fences are locked permanently--No access! As for the bug, I just wanted to move it in case the does end up being archived. If not, then that is good too! I am a LEO, so if I were caught I am sure that I would have received no punishment, so it wouldn't look bad for "geocaching in general". Thanks for all of your responses. Are you saying Lake Munson Recreation Area has been permanently closed? If so, you may want to drop the cache owner a note and let them know. However, that cache has been consistently receiving finds up through March of this year, before your find. Knowing how dangerous the back entrance across that dam or through the water is, I can't see that many cachers approaching from the back side. I am almost certain that the park is still open. Either way, an email to the owner will probably clear things up. Cache in question Quote
nonaeroterraqueous Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 I've done that cache. It is a travel bug hotel located off of a walking path in a nice park. That sign is new though. From the picture, you approached the cache from the shortest way in which requires you either traverse the dam or wade through some quick water. I wouldn't recommend that and can definitely see why it would now be posted. The proper way in requires a bit longer walk, but is completely legal access from a park. Aha! Actual insight! Do they allow that here? Quote
+rbennitt Posted May 2, 2007 Author Posted May 2, 2007 There is a huge sign posted "No Trespassing" but I had to get the bug out of there to move it on its way before the cache is archived. My question is, should I just email the publisher or should I email geocaching.com to get this cache archived? The only way to the cache is around the fence (where I busted my butt). The URL to the sign is http://www.geo-irc.net/images/100_0002.JPG Let me know what you all think please. I've done that cache. It is a travel bug hotel located off of a walking path in a nice park. That sign is new though. From the picture, you approached the cache from the shortest way in which requires you either traverse the dam or wade through some quick water. I wouldn't recommend that and can definitely see why it would now be posted. The proper way in requires a bit longer walk, but is completely legal access from a park. Thank you for clarifying this up for me. I did not know that there was a different entrance and I was about to go out now and look. You saved me a trip today, though, I will go back in a few. Thanks again! Quote
+simpjkee Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 It's funny how different people look at this differently. maybe it is because im new to cacheing but I would look at that as someone trying to throw me off course or something. to me the sign would only increase the challenge of getting the cache and only increase my desire to find it Quote
+egami Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 There is a huge sign posted "No Trespassing" but I had to get the bug out of there to move it on its way before the cache is archived. My question is, should I just email the publisher or should I email geocaching.com to get this cache archived? The only way to the cache is around the fence (where I busted my butt). The URL to the sign is http://www.geo-irc.net/images/100_0002.JPG Let me know what you all think please. I've done that cache. It is a travel bug hotel located off of a walking path in a nice park. That sign is new though. From the picture, you approached the cache from the shortest way in which requires you either traverse the dam or wade through some quick water. I wouldn't recommend that and can definitely see why it would now be posted. The proper way in requires a bit longer walk, but is completely legal access from a park. Thank you for clarifying this up for me. I did not know that there was a different entrance and I was about to go out now and look. You saved me a trip today, though, I will go back in a few. Thanks again! I would verify the situation. If that's a new sign there very well could be new fencing as well. If it's public property it's still governed by some agency. You could find out who and inquire there. Someone at the county office should know since it's a county sign. Based on what Geobain said though I'd start with the cache owner and see if they've noticed the change. They could be completely unaware, but if there is a change in policy with the county then the cache should be relcated to a more public friendly location. Quote
+sbell111 Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 It's funny how different people look at this differently. maybe it is because im new to cacheing but I would look at that as someone trying to throw me off course or something. to me the sign would only increase the challenge of getting the cache and only increase my desire to find itI agree. I would likely search to see if I couldn't find a legal access point. Quote
+halffast Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 I would just email the cache owner and let them figure out how to handle the situation. Quote
+Urubu Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 (edited) The cache description in this case has a clearly posted parking area and trailhead (in the main text, because it predates the 'additional waypoint' feature). In my earlier post about the SBA, I assumed that you had started there, rbennitt?? If not, try starting at those coordinates. Edited May 2, 2007 by Urubu Quote
+rbennitt Posted May 2, 2007 Author Posted May 2, 2007 The cache description in this case has a clearly posted parking area and trailhead (in the main text, because it predates the 'additional waypoint' feature). In my earlier post about the SBA, I assumed that you had started there, rbennitt?? If not, try starting at those coordinates. You are correct. I went today to those coordinates. Unfortunately, I assumed since there were time restrictions that I knew exactly where he/she was talking about. Thus, I ended up where I did as it used to be open only certain times of the day. Thank you all for teaching me a lesson as to not to jump to conclusions. What a great group of people p.s. If you feel like breaking the law (DON'T) my way was much much faster Quote
+thedeadpirate Posted May 2, 2007 Posted May 2, 2007 One thing you will learn as you cache more is that the shortest way in is not always the best way in. If you have a mapping gps you will definitely discover that where it routes you is often not the best way in. But that's part of the fun of learning the ropes. Quote
+CSpenceFLY Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 Where is the trouble. The cache is no longer available and it has been archived. The system worked as it should. Quote
+Knight2000 Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 Where is the trouble. The cache is no longer available and it has been archived. The system worked as it should. I thought the OP made a mistake as was mentioned later in the thread? Maybe i misread it. Quote
+KoosKoos Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 Since the cache owner hasn't logged in for a month and hasn't participated in this thread, they were probably shocked to see their cache archived all of a sudden. I hope the owner and/or some previous finders can point out to the reviewer that the cache isn't HIDDEN in an off-limits area....only that one finder took a bad path to find it and that it can then be re-enabled. It is another lesson in being careful how you approach geocaching and what you list in your logs as public record. Quote
+CSpenceFLY Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 Like a scratched record (CD for the younger crowd) people tend to discard the opinion of some that says the same thing over and over again. Quote
+thedeadpirate Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 Where is the trouble. The cache is no longer available and it has been archived. The system worked as it should. The system HAS NOT worked. That cache was archived for no good reason. The OP even admitted that he didn't read the description. If he had he would have found coords for PARKING in a PARK. This cache has been discussed ad nausium in our local forums. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with this cache. There is something wrong with crossing a No Tresspassing sign and fence to get a cache. But that is not the cache owner fault. Or problem quite frankly especially in light of all pertinent information being spelled out in detail on the cache page. Quote
+sbell111 Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 Where is the trouble. The cache is no longer available and it has been archived. The system worked as it should. The system HAS NOT worked. That cache was archived for no good reason. The OP even admitted that he didn't read the description. If he had he would have found coords for PARKING in a PARK. This cache has been discussed ad nausium in our local forums. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with this cache. There is something wrong with crossing a No Tresspassing sign and fence to get a cache. But that is not the cache owner fault. Or problem quite frankly especially in light of all pertinent information being spelled out in detail on the cache page. Do you know if anyone is contacting the reviewer to bring him up to speed? Quote
+thedeadpirate Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 Do you know if anyone is contacting the reviewer to bring him up to speed? I just contacted the OP on the local forums and asked him to contact CrowTRobot. I see he has already posted a note on the cache page. Hopefully this will get straigtened out quickly. Quote
+rbennitt Posted May 3, 2007 Author Posted May 3, 2007 Where is the trouble. The cache is no longer available and it has been archived. The system worked as it should. The system HAS NOT worked. That cache was archived for no good reason. The OP even admitted that he didn't read the description. If he had he would have found coords for PARKING in a PARK. This cache has been discussed ad nausium in our local forums. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with this cache. There is something wrong with crossing a No Tresspassing sign and fence to get a cache. But that is not the cache owner fault. Or problem quite frankly especially in light of all pertinent information being spelled out in detail on the cache page. Do you know if anyone is contacting the reviewer to bring him up to speed? How do I contact the reviewer?? I messed up, end of story. I had things to do today, but I will stay until this is unarchived as I feel horrible about it. It is a nice walk from the legal side and it suck that I ruined it. Quote
+egami Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 "This was completely my mistake. I decided to take a route that was not mentioned in the description and ended up where I did. The cache is as legal as it gets. I deleted that SBA log, I am not sure how it appeared back here. Anyways, this cache should not be archived!! The fault lies on me. And yes, I used trespassed under the authority of the Leon County Sheriff's Office. Thus, it was not trespassing, though I see your concern." -rbennett Viewing the most recent log I think this will come full circle and everything will be ok. Mistakes happen. It's part of life. Quote
+sbell111 Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 "This was completely my mistake. I decided to take a route that was not mentioned in the description and ended up where I did. The cache is as legal as it gets. I deleted that SBA log, I am not sure how it appeared back here. Anyways, this cache should not be archived!! The fault lies on me. And yes, I used trespassed under the authority of the Leon County Sheriff's Office. Thus, it was not trespassing, though I see your concern." -rbennett Viewing the most recent log I think this will come full circle and everything will be ok. Mistakes happen. It's part of life. The problem is, the reviewer doesn't read every log posted to archived cache pages. Quote
+sbell111 Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 (edited) Where is the trouble. The cache is no longer available and it has been archived. The system worked as it should.The system HAS NOT worked. That cache was archived for no good reason. The OP even admitted that he didn't read the description. If he had he would have found coords for PARKING in a PARK. This cache has been discussed ad nausium in our local forums. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with this cache. There is something wrong with crossing a No Tresspassing sign and fence to get a cache. But that is not the cache owner fault. Or problem quite frankly especially in light of all pertinent information being spelled out in detail on the cache page. Do you know if anyone is contacting the reviewer to bring him up to speed?How do I contact the reviewer?? I messed up, end of story. I had things to do today, but I will stay until this is unarchived as I feel horrible about it. It is a nice walk from the legal side and it suck that I ruined it.You can email him here. Remember to include the waypoint ID for the cache (GCHKTJ). Edited May 3, 2007 by sbell111 Quote
+thedeadpirate Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 How do I contact the reviewer?? I messed up, end of story. I had things to do today, but I will stay until this is unarchived as I feel horrible about it. It is a nice walk from the legal side and it suck that I ruined it. You can click on the reviewer's name above the post where he archived the cache. I sent an email to him explaining everything. Hopefully it will all be sorted out quickly. Quote
+egami Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 The problem is, the reviewer doesn't read every log posted to archived cache pages. I am aware of that. I was responding in general and started my reply prior to you posting yours. That's a perfectly valid point and I am sure with as much angst as there has been in this incident that someone will make it a point to contact him/her. Quote
+rbennitt Posted May 3, 2007 Author Posted May 3, 2007 How do I contact the reviewer?? I messed up, end of story. I had things to do today, but I will stay until this is unarchived as I feel horrible about it. It is a nice walk from the legal side and it suck that I ruined it. You can click on the reviewer's name above the post where he archived the cache. I sent an email to him explaining everything. Hopefully it will all be sorted out quickly. I too sent one. Man I will never post here again, I end up causing all kinds of trouble. I do, however, thank you all that have helped. Quote
+thedeadpirate Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 I too sent one. Man I will never post here again, I end up causing all kinds of trouble. I do, however, thank you all that have helped. I don't it hurt to post your concerns here. I would hope you learned something in the process. If so, then it's all good. It would be nice if you could make it to a local TAG event and pick other cacher's brains for a while. If you get a chance to make the next one, even if for a little while, we'd be glad to answer any questions you have. This is all part of the learning curve. P.S. I appologize for reacting so quickly to the archival. It's really no big deal as it is easily fixed. Quote
+rbennitt Posted May 3, 2007 Author Posted May 3, 2007 (edited) I too sent one. Man I will never post here again, I end up causing all kinds of trouble. I do, however, thank you all that have helped. I don't it hurt to post your concerns here. I would hope you learned something in the process. If so, then it's all good. It would be nice if you could make it to a local TAG event and pick other cacher's brains for a while. If you get a chance to make the next one, even if for a little while, we'd be glad to answer any questions you have. This is all part of the learning curve. P.S. I appologize for reacting so quickly to the archival. It's really no big deal as it is easily fixed. I am booked until June 15 when classes are out. I have to pull doubles on the weekends until then (posted my schedule on the TAG site). Afterwards, I will definitely make as many events as possible. Edited May 3, 2007 by rbennitt Quote
+Renegade Knight Posted May 3, 2007 Posted May 3, 2007 It's funny how different people look at this differently. maybe it is because im new to cacheing but I would look at that as someone trying to throw me off course or something. to me the sign would only increase the challenge of getting the cache and only increase my desire to find it Perfect. I think you guys "Get it". Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.