+MartyBartfast Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Where would you find the "Rhubarb Triangle" ? Yorkshire's a famous place for rhubarb, but I guess that you want something a bit more specific than that. Well if you can give me the right county I'll give you the DING. Quote Link to comment
+Fianccetto Posted April 28, 2012 Share Posted April 28, 2012 (edited) Lancashire then? (I think I feel my Yorkshire born grandmother turning in her grave...) Although I am sure 2 of the towns are Leeds and Bradford, and I think they are in Yorkshire (but maybe the West Riding has changed its boundaries since my family lived there. ) Edited April 28, 2012 by Fianccetto Quote Link to comment
+MartyBartfast Posted April 28, 2012 Share Posted April 28, 2012 Lancashire then? (I think I feel my Yorkshire born grandmother turning in her grave...) No (hint - there's no such county as "Yorkshire"!) Quote Link to comment
+Fianccetto Posted April 28, 2012 Share Posted April 28, 2012 Oh I see...West Yorkshire? (grandma has stopped spinning now.) Quote Link to comment
+MartyBartfast Posted April 28, 2012 Share Posted April 28, 2012 Oh I see...West Yorkshire? (grandma has stopped spinning now.) Ding Depending on the sources it's either Leeds, Bradford & Wakefield; or a much smaller area comprising 3 towns between Wakefield & Leeds that no-one outside the region will have heard of, Quote Link to comment
+Fianccetto Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 My turn again already? The White Star Line launched RMS Olympic, RMS Titanic and HMHS Britannic. What did they originally intend to call The Britannic (before The Titanic sank)? Quote Link to comment
+keehotee Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 (edited) . Edited April 29, 2012 by keehotee Quote Link to comment
+Fianccetto Posted April 29, 2012 Share Posted April 29, 2012 Um yeah thanks Keehotee..You get the ding anyway, even if you did delete your answer, it got sent to my inbox! (Nobody told Snopes about your conspiracy theory, which is where I got the idea for the question.) Quote Link to comment
+keehotee Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Whoop whoop. OK - everybody "knows" cowboy hats are called Stetsons, right? What are they actually called? The British design was copied by Mr Stetson, who later lost a court battle over ownership of the design - but by then the damage was done! as a hint,the hats were originally made in - and named after - a village not 3 miles from where I'm currently sat .... Quote Link to comment
+eusty Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 I cheated...and didn't get the answer!! According to legend, Stetson invented the hat while on a hunting trip while showing his companions how he could make cloth out of fur without tanning Quote Link to comment
dodgydaved Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 I cheated...and didn't get the answer!! According to legend, Stetson invented the hat while on a hunting trip while showing his companions how he could make cloth out of fur without tanning So did I, and I did get the answer :ph34r: Quote Link to comment
+Fianccetto Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 I can only think of the Ten Gallon Hat (Don't suppose there's a village called Ten Gallon? I doubt a hat can hold ten gallons...) Quote Link to comment
+MartyBartfast Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 Well I googled it when the question was asked, and I'd never heard of it, and I now can't even remember it. I reckon this is going to go unanswered unless the Mad H@tter drops by and has some inside knowlege Quote Link to comment
+londontavern Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 Well this is a slow day at work so, Frampton Cotterell home of the cowboy hat. Quote Link to comment
+keehotee Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 Well this is a slow day at work so, Frampton Cotterell home of the cowboy hat. Closest so far - but you still haven't named the hat..... Quote Link to comment
+londontavern Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 Ooops! I think the proper answer must in that case be a 'Christy' named after the factory owner (and factory) where it was first made. Before that nasty Mr Stetson come along and 'stole' the design. Quote Link to comment
+keehotee Posted May 8, 2012 Share Posted May 8, 2012 Ooops! I think the proper answer must in that case be a 'Christy' named after the factory owner (and factory) where it was first made. Before that nasty Mr Stetson come along and 'stole' the design. If only.... No - they were called Frampton's - but as you've been closest, and this has gone on a while, you can have the ding Quote Link to comment
+londontavern Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 Wow! I've finally won a prize, Eeeek! First I shall reveal my sources Next a nice and easy one although a bit out of season as it is normally connected with the Norwegian Christmas tree in Trafalgar square. I served on this ship in 1972. One of its predecessors’ evacuated the King of Norway from Norway to Britain in 1940. What is the name of the ship? Quote Link to comment
+londontavern Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Sorry but no ding! Although I was in the Fleet Air Arm, I never served on the Ark Royal. Quote Link to comment
+londontavern Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Ding! CORRECT HMS Devonshire and now its over to you. The pressure of being in the hot seat was starting to distract me from work and organizing my caches for our trip to Majorca next week. Quote Link to comment
+McDeHack Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 Staying with the nautical theme. Where in London can you see Nelsons fleet? Quote Link to comment
+Betelgeuse Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 That's one of those little known London things. Nelson, atop his column faces down The Mall and surveys his fleet of ships each atop a lamp post Quote Link to comment
+McDeHack Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 That's one of those little known London things. Nelson, atop his column faces down The Mall and surveys his fleet of ships each atop a lamp post Ding. For you. I thought that it was going to be a difficult one. Quote Link to comment
+MartyBartfast Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 That's one of those little known London things. Nelson, atop his column faces down The Mall and surveys his fleet of ships each atop a lamp post Ding. For you. I thought that it was going to be a difficult one. Well I think it was a difficult one and googled it, which ruled me out from answering. A facinating bit of info that I wouldn't otherwise have known, its amazing what you learn on here. I'll have to have a close look at the lamp posts next time I'm down The Mall. Quote Link to comment
+Betelgeuse Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Keeping with the London theme, can anybody tell me what metal the statue of Anteros on the Shaftesbury Memorial is cast in? Quote Link to comment
+Betelgeuse Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Aluminium DING! Although the fountain it stands on is cast in bronze, the statue itself is cast in aluminium. It's reputed to be the first ever statue cast in this metal. Over to you... Quote Link to comment
dodgydaved Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Many London addresses are special, 10 Downing Street, 221B Baker Street...... But what is special about 22-23 Leinster Terrace ? Quote Link to comment
+NickandAliandEliza Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Many London addresses are special, 10 Downing Street, 221B Baker Street...... But what is special about 22-23 Leinster Terrace ? It's the most pointless place in London to play knock-down-ginger. Quote Link to comment
dodgydaved Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Many London addresses are special, 10 Downing Street, 221B Baker Street...... But what is special about 22-23 Leinster Terrace ? It's the most pointless place in London to play knock-down-ginger. Surely is - but why? Quote Link to comment
+keehotee Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Many London addresses are special, 10 Downing Street, 221B Baker Street...... But what is special about 22-23 Leinster Terrace ? It's the most pointless place in London to play knock-down-ginger. Surely is - but why? Are these the famous fake house fronts to hide the railway vent? Quote Link to comment
dodgydaved Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Close enough Tim, over to you. They were built when the "Cut and Cover u/ground went through to preserve the outlook! DING!!!!! Quote Link to comment
+keehotee Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 OK The tropics of Capricorn and Cancer are so named because when they were first identified, 2000ish years ago, the sun was entering the constellations of Cancer in the Summer, and Capricorn in the winter. What would they be known as if they were discovered today? Quote Link to comment
+The Patrician Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 (edited) I seem to remember someone singing about the 'Dawning of the Age of Aquarius' a few years ago, otherwise I haven't got a clue! Edit to say - thinking about it if it's gone from Capricorn to Aquarius it's presumably gone from Cancer to Leo. Edited May 14, 2012 by The Patrician Quote Link to comment
+mellers Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 OK The tropics of Capricorn and Cancer are so named because when they were first identified, 2000ish years ago, the sun was entering the constellations of Cancer in the Summer, and Capricorn in the winter. What would they be known as if they were discovered today? Ah, one of those "I never would have known that" questions. Given that premise however, I'll go for something close and guess at Gemini and Sagittarius. Quote Link to comment
+Team Noodles Posted May 15, 2012 Share Posted May 15, 2012 I seem to remember someone singing about the 'Dawning of the Age of Aquarius' a few years ago, otherwise I haven't got a clue! Edit to say - thinking about it if it's gone from Capricorn to Aquarius it's presumably gone from Cancer to Leo. zeitgeist? Quote Link to comment
+Betelgeuse Posted May 15, 2012 Share Posted May 15, 2012 (edited) Taurus in the northern hemisphere (Cancer), Sagittarius in the southern (Capricorn) The movement is caused by the Earth's axial precession around it's 23.5 degree tilt. It'll be Cancer and Capricorn again in around 24,000 years (the planet takes approx 26,000 years to do a full rotation around the axial tilt). I did check the IAU constellation boundaries in my Tirion Sky Atlas though. Edited May 15, 2012 by Betelgeuse Quote Link to comment
+Simply Paul Posted May 24, 2012 Author Share Posted May 24, 2012 keehotee? Ding or no Ding? Quote Link to comment
+keehotee Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 (edited) Taurus in the northern hemisphere (Cancer), Sagittarius in the southern (Capricorn) The movement is caused by the Earth's axial precession around it's 23.5 degree tilt. It'll be Cancer and Capricorn again in around 24,000 years (the planet takes approx 26,000 years to do a full rotation around the axial tilt). I did check the IAU constellation boundaries in my Tirion Sky Atlas though. Whoops - wrong answer when first posted, and edits don't bump a thread, so missed this post.... DING Edited May 25, 2012 by keehotee Quote Link to comment
+Betelgeuse Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 Turning from superstition (astrology) to science (astronomy)... One of the constellations that formed the answer to the last question (Taurus) contains an object called the Crab Nebula. Within this nebula is an object that sparked a nobel prize controversy. What is it? Quote Link to comment
+Fianccetto Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 Is that a pulsar...a single (fastly spinning) dying star that's collapsed on itself with a beam of light appearing to gp on and off... the first query being 'is this evidence of intelligent life' but an irregular pattern would be better to show life...sorry, not sure where the Nobel prize controversy comes in. Quote Link to comment
+Simply Paul Posted May 26, 2012 Author Share Posted May 26, 2012 The prize didn't go to the woman who discovered the pulsar, but to her boss. Quote Link to comment
+Betelgeuse Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 Is that a pulsar...a single (fastly spinning) dying star that's collapsed on itself with a beam of light appearing to gp on and off... the first query being 'is this evidence of intelligent life' but an irregular pattern would be better to show life...sorry, not sure where the Nobel prize controversy comes in. DING! It was the first pulsar ever discovered, and the credit goes to Jocelyn Bell. A pulsar is a neutron star spinning very rapidly (as the supernova core collapses, the rate of spin increases in the same way that a skater's spin increases as they pull their arms in). It's not a beam of light per se but rather a beam of electromagnetic radiation - it was the radio 'scruff' that was detected although some pulsars have also been seen to blink. As to the Nobel controversy, from Wiki: "She did not share in the Nobel Prize, despite the fact that it was she, having helped build[18] the four-acre radio telescope over two years, who initially recorded and then noticed the anomaly, reviewing 96 feet of paper data per night, and, as she confirmed in the Beautiful Minds programme, had to be persistent in recording and reporting it in the face of scorn from Hewish, who was initially insistent the anomaly was due to interference and man-made. She referred in the programme to meetings held by Hewish and Ryle which she should have been invited to, but was not. After Ryle and Hewish had concocted a "little green man" intelligent life theory to explain the initial single pulse, further persistent recording and study of the data on Bell Burnell's own initiative revealed the presence of other similar pulses, finally leading to the explanation of them as pulsars.[19][20][21]" Several prominent scientists, including Fred Hoyle, expressed their disgust with the decision not to include Jocelyn Bell. Over to you Quote Link to comment
+Fianccetto Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 The prize didn't go to the woman who discovered the pulsar, but to her boss. Is that a pulsar...a single (fastly spinning) dying star that's collapsed on itself with a beam of light appearing to gp on and off... the first query being 'is this evidence of intelligent life' but an irregular pattern would be better to show life...sorry, not sure where the Nobel prize controversy comes in. DING! It was the first pulsar ever discovered, and the credit goes to Jocelyn Bell. A pulsar is a neutron star spinning very rapidly (as the supernova core collapses, the rate of spin increases in the same way that a skater's spin increases as they pull their arms in). It's not a beam of light per se but rather a beam of electromagnetic radiation - it was the radio 'scruff' that was detected although some pulsars have also been seen to blink. As to the Nobel controversy, from Wiki: "She did not share in the Nobel Prize, despite the fact that it was she, having helped build[18] the four-acre radio telescope over two years, who initially recorded and then noticed the anomaly, reviewing 96 feet of paper data per night, and, as she confirmed in the Beautiful Minds programme, had to be persistent in recording and reporting it in the face of scorn from Hewish, who was initially insistent the anomaly was due to interference and man-made. She referred in the programme to meetings held by Hewish and Ryle which she should have been invited to, but was not. After Ryle and Hewish had concocted a "little green man" intelligent life theory to explain the initial single pulse, further persistent recording and study of the data on Bell Burnell's own initiative revealed the presence of other similar pulses, finally leading to the explanation of them as pulsars.[19][20][21]" Several prominent scientists, including Fred Hoyle, expressed their disgust with the decision not to include Jocelyn Bell. Over to you I think the Ding should go to Simply Paul...I got to the general ball park area, but he got the catch and answered your specific question. Quote Link to comment
+Betelgeuse Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 Well, the nub of the question was what the object is and you answered correctly with pulsar. The Nobel prize was a bit of a supplementary. You got there first and deserve the DING Quote Link to comment
+Fianccetto Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 Well, I wouldn't want to be Hewish about it. OK, let's try this one out... A what is to an eight as a quad is to a four and a double is to a pair? Quote Link to comment
+Simply Paul Posted May 26, 2012 Author Share Posted May 26, 2012 Is it as simple as Octuple? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.