Jump to content

The All New All New Groundspeak UK Pub Quiz


Recommended Posts

Bingo.! (or whatever the Italian is for bingo ) ding to searcherdog

(With an honourable mention to speakers-corner who sent me the answer by e-mail yesterday, but had researched part of it so would not falsely claim the ding here.)

Italy was on our side in WW1 (unlike the next time ... ) Apparently Haig was not happy to take any men away from the Western Front, but Lloyd George insisted. The Italians had joined the war somewhat late, and got battered by the opposing Austro-Hungarian armies, especially when the German armr reinforced them (over 1.5 million lives lost from both sides in several battles) so French and British troops were sent to back them up.

Some first hand info about the logistics of the long, slow train journey for anyone interested here

They set off from the Western Front on the 23rd November, by today, 28th,  the records say:

 "28th NOVEMBER
1917–1/1st Buckinghamshire Battalion  - IN THE TRAIN. En route to ITALY.
NO 1 TRAIN Route for Day:
PIACENZA arr 10.45am
PARMA arr 12.15pm
REGGIO arr 3.30pm
MODENA arr 6.45pm
BOLOGNA arr 8.40pm
Spent greater part of night in BOLOGNA Station: full advantage could not be taken of it by giving men and horses exercise owing to our never knowing when we might start.
 
NO 2 TRAIN Route for the Day
ST PIERRE D’ARENA – ARQUATA – NOVI – TORTONE – VOGHERA – STRADELLA – PIACENZA –PARMA
No incidents of importance during the day.
2 men of B Coy missed the train at STRADELLA, and did not rejoin during the journey.
Coys had teas at PIACENZA."
 
From mud to limestone mountains.
On his 21st birthday in January 1918 grandad was marching up one of those mountains to help protect a water source . Apparently as a gift, the officer carried his rifle all day for him.
Link to comment

OK, sometimes you have a boring wait to occupy, and I've reached an impasse withh the puzzle cache I'm banging my head against, so I went through and revised my calculations for this, having realised I'd only added in the milking stools the once. So, as my grammar school training always insisted in exams you must 'show your working'  here goes : best read from the bottom to top
day 12 = 182+24 = 206   (day 11 plus twelve lords a leaping)
day 11 = 160+22 = 182   (day 10 plus eleven ladies)
day 10 = 140+20 = 160   (day 9 plus 20 for ten pipers)
day  9 = 122+18 = 140   (day 8 plus 18 for  nine drummers)
day  8 = 50+72   = 122   (day 7 plus 8 maid/cow/milking stool combos, 9 legs per)= 72)
day  7 = 36+14    =  50   (day 6 plus 14 for seven swans)
day  6 = 24+12    =  36   (day 5 plus 12 for Six geese)

day  5 =                  24    gold rings,same legs as day 4
day  4 =   16+8  =   24    (day 3 plus 8 for four colly birds)
day  3 =   10+6  =  16    (day 2 plus 6 for three fench hens)
day  2 =   6+4   =   10    (day 1 plus 4 for two turtle doves)
Day  1 = 2+2+2   =  6    (me,my true love + one partridge)

                   Total = 976

So, my new answer is 976.

Link to comment

 Or. if inanimate legs are disallowed ( and assuming none of the lords a leaping are drunk as lords, i.e. legless )

day 12 = 158+24=  182 (day 11 plus twelve lords a leaping)
day 11 = 136+22 = 158 (day 10 plus eleven ladies)
day 10 = 116+20 = 136   (day 9 plus 20 for ten pipers)
day  9 =  98+18 = 116 (day 8 plus 18 for  nine drummers)
day  8 = 50+48  =  98   (day 7 plus 8 maid/cow combos,6 legs per)=48)
      Giving a  total without milking stools = 856

I think I need a lie down now.

Link to comment

Hal-an-tow, the problem with your method is that it adds me and my true love on every day of Christmas. Although they (we?) are mentioned 12 times, I think it is safe to assume that there is only one true love, and certainly only one of me.

So revising your incremental method gives

Day 1 = 2

Day 2 = 2+(2x2) = 2+4 = 6

Day 3 = 6+(3x2) = 6+6 = 12

Day 4 = 12+(4x2) = 12+8 = 20

Day 5 = 20+(5x0) = 20+0 = 20

Day 6 = 20+(6x2) = 20+12 = 32

Day 7 = 32+(7x2) = 32+14 = 46

Day 8 = 46+(8x9) = 46+72 = 118 (assuming 8 milkmaids, 8 cows and 8 three-legged stools)

Day 9 = 118+(9x2) = 118 + 18 = 136

Day 10 = 136+(10x2) = 136+20 = 156

Day 11 = 156+(11x2) = 156+22 = 178

Day 12 = 178+(12x2) = 178+24 = 202

Total = 928, plus me and my true love = 932.

 

If you ignore the milking stools, the last five days becomes

Day 8 = 46+(8x6) = 46+48 = 94

Day 9 = 94+(9x2) = 94+18 = 112

Day 10 = 112+(10x2) = 112+20 = 132

Day 11 = 132+(11x2) = 132+22 = 154

Day 12 = 154+(12x2) = 154+24 = 178

Total = 808, plus me and my true love = 812 as stated earlier.

 

Boggin's Dad, have any of us hit the target yet?

Link to comment

Ah, a debate on semantics, that could easily run to a dozen pages of intemperate shouting if this wasn't a civilised area ... :laughing:

If the " first person plus beloved" characters appear in each verse, and we assume they are the same individuals each day, how can we say the same french hens etc etc are not also re-deployed each day ? I can't tell chickens apart*, you could easily fool me by claiming these were entirely different to yesterdays fowl ...same for the other birds, none of which has the distinctive individually varied plumage which identifies budgies for instance  ...

Also, the initial question said ' How many legs ' , not how many different legs, so same beloved, same legs, different day = 2 more legs in the song  :lol:

I rest my case, (while suggesting that the problem lies with the phrasing of the question) and await the final authoritative verdict of the questioner (who is probably weeping softly over a calculator as I type) .

 

 

^ As an afterthought, I have farmer friends who have some rescued battery hens clucking round their yard, one of who (inevitably named 'Stumpy' ) I can distinguish from the rest,  but only because she would ruin the leg count with 1 .5 to her name  ... pretty sure she is not French though ....

Link to comment

I am going to have to give this one to searcherdog, but a close second and congratulations to Hal-an-tow for getting full marks, as he showed all his working

My intitial sum led me to 928 - I was including the milking stool, but then had not added in me, and my true love....

So the answer I am going to judge as right is 976 which includes those extra 48 legs.

Well done searcherdog A very festive ding for you - Over to you

 

Link to comment

Arrgh, I know I've heard of this folktale - it's similar to the Russian Baboushka  story* ... so it's not Russian, and I know the German and Austrian festive scare figures are male, so I'll have a guess at Swiss maybe ?

* Woman invited to accompany kings to visit baby Jesus thinks she is too busy with housework, turns down chance, thereafter roams earth for eternity trying to  make up for her choice. The moral of the story: ALWAYS abandon housework at the slightest pretext.  Works for me ...

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...