+jcblough Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 I recently purchases a garmin Vista Cx - I'm interested in the topo maps for it - the U.S. East maps. Anyone have or used these, are they worth the money? What kind of detail can I expect. The garmin website browse version of the maps has been broken the last couple of days. Quote Link to comment
+Timpat Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 The US Topo 1:100K is the best you can get for your Garmin for complete uploadable topo map coverage of the U.S. I like having it along with my street mapping (City Select in my case). This topo gives a lot of good added land features and I feel it is well worth the cost. I also have Nat Parks 24K Topo (East) and for my area of northestern NY it adds terrific detailed topo coverage. Quote Link to comment
+scotte Posted March 28, 2007 Share Posted March 28, 2007 There's a rumor that a 1:24K topo product for the whole U.S. will be available from Garmin sometime this year. Should be a nice upgrade from the current, out of date 1:100K topo... Guess we wait and see! Quote Link to comment
beauxp Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 The US Topo 1:100K is the best you can get for your Garmin for complete uploadable topo map coverage of the U.S. I like having it along with my street mapping (City Select in my case). This topo gives a lot of good added land features and I feel it is well worth the cost. I also have Nat Parks 24K Topo (East) and for my area of northestern NY it adds terrific detailed topo coverage. That would be great. If it were so, I would wait for it to come out rather than buying the product already out there Quote Link to comment
DogFleazJR Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 I recently purchases a garmin Vista Cx - I'm interested in the topo maps for it - the U.S. East maps. Anyone have or used these, are they worth the money? What kind of detail can I expect. The garmin website browse version of the maps has been broken the last couple of days. My experience with topos on the GPS is perhaps a bit different that Timpat's. Everyone is welcome to their opinion, here's mine, feel free to disagree. I find the topos on the GPSr not all that useful. I think part of reason is the screen is too small to really get a good gauge of the topography. The 1:100k maps are a little sparse on details to begin with, and then cutting out a 2 x 3 inch piece of the map to show on the screen, you get even less. Some trails are included in the Topo USA maps, but few of them are correct. There are more small streams marked in the topos than in the street maps, which has helped me out on occasion. For trip planning and to look at tracks after the fact, I use more detailed topos on my computer (I am a big TopoFusion fan, but the National Geographic maps are also very nice). In trip planning, I will use the detailed topos on my computer to mark my intended course and then download this to the GPSr. I can then use that track as a guide. If we have to go off course, I still know where I have to get back to. When we are headed off grid, I take a paper map and compass with me anyway. I’m sure many users find their topos very valuable. I’m indifferent to them. Nice to have, but I don’t use them as much as I thought I would before I bought them. Now a s 1:24 map set might change my mind … Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.