Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
2oldfarts (the rockhounders)

The Contest Logging Thread

Recommended Posts

Cleaning up more of the backlog.

 

Recoveries from 3 23 2007.

 

DV2314, REG

 

DV2315, REG

 

DV2316, REG

 

DV0549, REG

 

DV0548, REG

 

DV2248, REG

 

DV2235, REG

 

DV2254, REG

 

Recoveries from 3 24 2007.

 

DU2058, REG

 

DU0450, DNF

 

CZ1911, REG

 

DU2061, REG

 

DU2066, REG

 

DU0542, REG

 

CZ1952, REG or maybe it's ERR? :lostsignal:

 

CZ1951, REG

 

CZ1950, REG

 

CZ1948, REG

 

CZ1947, REG

 

CZ1910, REG

 

DU2060, REG

 

Continuing to the results from 3 25 2007.

 

DU2276, REG

 

CZ1953, REG

 

DU2059, REG

 

One from 3 26 2007.

 

DU2072, REG

 

And finally, 3 27 2007.

 

DU1002, REG

 

DV2238, REG

Share this post


Link to post

Not one of my better days. Too many people at the day care center to dig in their lawn. :P Couldn't find one that Zhanna and Rick in NEPA found easily (found the reference mark, though.) Went for a church spire that three people have logged, only to discover that the church was built in 1970. The spire was observed in 1942. Oh, well. What I did find on this gloriously beautiful day:

LY2083 REG

LY0635 REG

LY0636 REG and an S!

 

2OLDFARTS Fart Counter V.0331 rel666

Share this post


Link to post

On March 20 I logged

LC0783 as REG. I should have logged it as ERR

 

I'm sorry for any confusion and extra work this may have caused and appreciate John letting me change it.

Share this post


Link to post

Finally getting into the benchmarking action. Lots going on, and I don't expect to win, but I at least want to make a showing!

 

From Saturday:

RK0583 REG

AA8113 REG

QM0586 REG

I would suggest that the previous two logs are in error, as the FCC shows this tower was constructed in 2000, replacing the previous tower. I can't, however PROVE that the correct tower was not there when the previous two logs were made. I logged as a regular find, and will leave this to the judge's discretion. It's not provable as the logs do not include photos, so I logged it as a regular.

QM0582 REG

AA5211 REG

AA5210 REG

AA5208 REG

Share this post


Link to post

From Sunday:

 

RK0416 REG

RK0115 REG

RK0418 DNF

RK0696 DNF

RK0696 was logged as not found in 2000 by the MIDT. To be honest, I think it was not looked for, judging by the note and the record I've noted from the reporting individual. That's how it was logged, however. The concrete portion of the dock remains intact. With RK0418, I'll leave it to the judge's discretion--the chiseled square IS very hard to see in the photos. It stands out much better in person.

RK0116 REG

RK0112 REG

 

John, there are some questionable "extras" here. PM if necessary, but I will leave everything at your discretion. No explanation necessary. Thanks for your work on the contest!

Share this post


Link to post

Gee, I've had great luck the past 2 days with the marks. All the marks I looked for were easy to find as they had been dug out and marked on the roadway or with a stake. If it was only this easy all the time, I'd be WAY ahead in the points.

LX2812 - reg

LX2813 - reg

LX2808 - reg

LX2215 - reg

LX2810 - reg

LX2815 - reg

 

2 old farts =

LX2810 - D82 = D

 

gives me - 2; D

Edited by Firefighter Skippy

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

×
×
  • Create New...