A Couple of REEEALY Old Caches

[+Isonzo Karst]

Take a look at the date hidden 1799

and then there's this one 1850.

 

Anybody ever see any older than these?

[+Bill & Tammy]

Take a look at the date hidden 1799

and then there's this one 1850.

 

Anybody ever see any older than these?

 

Well this just about changes everything, doesn't it?

[+cache_test_dummies]

I can understand the cache placed in 1850, since that was the year that president Millard Fillmore turned off selective availability.

 

But you're right - that 1799 cache is really old.

[Clan Riffster]

September 19, 1799. This date in UFO history:

A "beautiful ball blazing with white light,..." was seen at 8:30 P.M. in England. It made no sound, and red sparks flew from it.

 

January 01, 1850. This date is USA history:

US Representative (D-Mi) Thomas A. E. Weadock was born. Weadock was a member of the Ancient Order of Hibernians.

 

Grab your tinfoil hats, people! The conspiracy is real!

[+Arndtwe]

Take a look at the date hidden 1799

and then there's this one 1850.

 

Anybody ever see any older than these?

 

the way i see it its not possible for them to be that old becuase they both have 6 digit cache ID's

[+Snoogans]

Take a look at the date hidden 1799

and then there's this one 1850.

 

Anybody ever see any older than these?

 

 

Caches...No.

 

 

But I have several dozen TBs that seem to have been launched, Monday, January 01, 0001.

 

 

Some sort of glitch I guess. They should have a 2003 launch date. I haven't bothered to try to get it fixed yet.

[+Isonzo Karst]

If I had 01/01/0001 TBs, I sure wouldn't fix them. There's a unique date for you. And you can lord your 'old geezerhood' over the newbies.