+Geojiggs Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 I just aquired an 60cx and I have an unopened City Navigator V8 sitting here that i am wondering if i should trade for the NT version. I understand the map compression difference, my main question is the map refreshing rate. It said in the FAQ that a more compressed map takes more CPU power and i am curious if anyone out there has seen or noticed a difference. The wording makes me believe that the non NT version would refresh and scroll faster in 60cx. I dont care about file size so much im not going to put the whole county in it. Just the midwest area. Thank you!! Kris Quote Link to comment
+Quoddy Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 The only difference that I've noted was a slower than normal phasing back to the map after a zoomed-in turn during auto routing. It's fairly normal to drive almost a full block before getting the new map back. Quote Link to comment
+Geojiggs Posted January 18, 2007 Author Share Posted January 18, 2007 The only difference that I've noted was a slower than normal phasing back to the map after a zoomed-in turn during auto routing. It's fairly normal to drive almost a full block before getting the new map back. Is the NT slower or the standard vesion? Quote Link to comment
Dragonmaster13 Posted January 18, 2007 Share Posted January 18, 2007 nt is slightly slower Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.