lakeuk Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 Noticed a cache I visited last year 'Don't Get Stumped' has become temporary unavailable due to the reviewers concern on whether the cache owner is in a position to maintain the cache if/when required - I'm sure the cache was original placed by a reviewer last year, but the current guy has caches all over the place (moving off track now) Anyway this has got me thinking, what do people consider a reasonable distance to maintain their own cache in a reasonable time upon being notified of a problem/query. Quote Link to comment
+Jaz666 Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 Well I think the section of the cacher in question's profile which says "Living overseas, and loving every minute of it" is probably what has Lacto concerned! Quote Link to comment
+adambro Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 But his location does say "Midlands England" so perhaps he is from the US, living overseas as in here in the UK. Looking at his finds and other hides does seem to go along with this theory. Quote Link to comment
The Royles Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 Anyway this has got me thinking, what do people consider a reasonable distance to maintain their own cache in a reasonable time upon being notified of a problem/query. I would say if we can be to the cache and back in half a day it is reasonable (just my opinion). Quote Link to comment
+The Golem Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 This cache is quite close to me - I'd be willing to adopt it if there's an issue with maintenance. It'd be a shame to lose it as it's a good location. Quote Link to comment
+The Klever Boys Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 (edited) On similar lines (and I know it's really none of my business) but I'm always intrigued by the owner of this cache and how he gets time to maintain his other caches: http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_detai...=y&decrypt= I guess that's why he's a pilot! Edited August 8, 2006 by The Klever Boys Quote Link to comment
alistair_uk Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 This was debated not so long ago and I believe the rule of thumb is around 50 miles. Beyond that you need to show that you are able to maintain it in a timely fashion. Quote Link to comment
+Jango & Boba Fett Posted August 8, 2006 Share Posted August 8, 2006 (edited) On similar lines (and I know it's really none of my business) but I'm always intrigued by the owner of this cache and how he gets time to maintain his other caches: http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_detai...=y&decrypt= I guess that's why he's a pilot! Helodriver is a USAF transpor pilot based in California and has a couple of great caches around those two medium sized American towns Mildenhall & Lakenheath. If you ever get the chance to do Planespotter on Spy Corner take it. You'll notice that although he has caches from Afganistan to New Mexico they are all close to USAF bases; and he does visit and maintain his caches to a good standard. As regards the how far do you consider is a reasonable distance to maintain your own cache I don't look further than 100km in planning caches that I will maintain personnaly, and indeed the three most distant local caches I set I then passed them on to fellow cachers who lived more locally as a Christmas present I do have a couple which are nearlt 600 miles from home by road but I have a local cacher who looks after them and has a large sealed envelope with detailed written & pictorial *spoilers* in case emergency maintenace is required - they're not the sort of cache he likes; reasonable walk, no puzzles to solve nice picnic spot near the cache). Edited August 8, 2006 by Jango & Boba Fett Quote Link to comment
+rutson Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 Hmmm..... Must say I'm a little confused by this. The logs are all positive, no reported problems with the cache, it was found a mere fortnight since by a responsible, experienced cacher and the owner logged into the site yesterday. The guidelines state: As the cache owner, you are also responsible for physically checking your cache periodically, and especially when someone reports a problem with the cache (missing, damaged, wet, etc.). You may temporarily disable your cache to let others know not to hunt for it until you have a chance to fix the problem. This feature is to allow you a reasonable time – normally a few weeks – in which to arrange a visit to your cache. In the event that a cache is not being properly maintained, or has been temporarily disabled for an extended period of time, we may archive or transfer the listing. If this is the way things are going, then it's a sad day. I reckon the quickest I could get to any of my caches and back is around 53 hours. So, I suppose it's time to put my caches to bed and acccept that given I am never in one place for three months, I can't place any more. Quote Link to comment
Lactodorum Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 Keen cache watchers will have noticed that the cache in question is now back in action thanks to a friendly explanation from the owner. There's more to this "job" than just reviewing new caches and quite a bit of "action" takes place behind the scenes, much of which never becomes public. In the case of cache maintenance, there are no hard and fast rules. As a general rule if a new cache is within 50 miles of the owner's home location it is assumed to be OK. Outside that we will probably ask about maintenance plans. If you are willing and able to sort out problems with a cache within a "reasonable" time there is no distance limit. What is "reasonable"? It all depends. If a cache is in a high traffic area and gets several visits a week, then we might think a shorter reaction time more appropriate than for a remote cache that only gets visited every few months. I would say that a reaction time of 53 hours is WELL within anything we might consider appropriate so no worries there! Quote Link to comment
+The Flying Boots Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 We like to go by the rule that as long as we can cycle to a cache to maintain it should we happen to be without a vehicle then thats a good enough distance away. Being without a vehicle has happened to us for several long periods of time and during one of those periods we cycled from home to Luton airport in a day, a trip of 112 miles to go on a cycling holiday. So inside 50 miles would be a good rule of thumb. Quote Link to comment
+currykev Posted August 9, 2006 Share Posted August 9, 2006 I think 50 miles is a liberal and adequate distance.For me it is time rather than distance. I am in West London and I keep to caches N/NW/SW and W of where I live as going East can take an age. My brother lives SE but it takes 1.5 hours on the road to his place yet he is only 20 odd miles away. I see him rarely except when we meet up centrally.As long as he buys me a pint. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.