+The Cheeseheads Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 I recently have had a conversation with a fellow cacher, a high-numbered cacher, and he/ or she had been talking to a low-numbered member at a cache that they had found at the same time, and the story this " no name cacher" told me, made my blood boil. the high-numbered member was out for a second cache, he/she was new to the game/sport, and because of that he/she was taken advantage of. the story gos like this, he/she was out looking for a cache, and found it, right around the same time, another cacher, a low-numbered member, found the exact same time. The high-numbered member (who was there first) was scanning through the cache ( a ammo box) when he/she saw there first travel bug, just then the low-numbered member, snatched it out of the box, and to make a long story short, used the excuse of having a low member number as being the one who was "supposed, and intitled to" take the bug. To me that is not right at all, I would not have been happy if the cacher was me, not only did the higher-numbered member not get the bug, he thought the low-numbered member was telling him the truth!!!! now, I know alot of cachers, high and low-numbered, and to me we/they are all the same in person, no one is better then everyone else, or has that changed? this is a true story, and I did not use names, so it didn't accuse any one, or hurt anyone. thank you --------------------> the cheeseheads Link to comment
+wimseyguy Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 You mean it isn't all about the numbers? Link to comment
+carleenp Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Posting just to see my number..... Link to comment
+Maingray Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Sorry, I only reply to OPs with lower MNs than I. Link to comment
ATMouse Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Posting just to see my number..... Show off! Link to comment
+Prime Suspect Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Ridiculous. The numbers are meaningless. Everyone knows that it's the Charter Members who are better than everyone one else. Link to comment
+The Cheeseheads Posted July 19, 2006 Author Share Posted July 19, 2006 Ridiculous. The numbers are meaningless. Everyone knows that it's the Charter Members who are better than everyone one else. dadgum skippy! Link to comment
+Blue Bomb Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 (edited) Please excuse this post, but I want to know now. Edit: 176,800. Wow! I guess I'm a high numbered cacher. Edited July 19, 2006 by Blue Bomb Link to comment
+WascoZooKeeper Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Ridiculous. The numbers are meaningless. Everyone knows that it's the Charter Members who are better than everyone one else. No, it's the Titanium Members who are better. Link to comment
cache n burn Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 Over in getting started I saw a cacher who joined in early June at about 703,000 and another who joined on July 14th with a number of about 755,000. Those are REALLY high numbers! And quite a growth rate too! Link to comment
+The Cheeseheads Posted July 19, 2006 Author Share Posted July 19, 2006 I guess that answers the age-old question about how many registered members there are... Link to comment
+JohnTee Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 (edited) Who's member #666? That would be Circum My number's bigger 'n your number! Nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah . . . JohnTee Edited July 19, 2006 by JohnTee Link to comment
+BlueDeuce Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 (edited) Hey, wait a minute I was just starting a poker game! Put those numbers back! Edited July 19, 2006 by BlueDeuce Link to comment
+The Cheeseheads Posted July 19, 2006 Author Share Posted July 19, 2006 This thread has suddenly made no sense at all... Link to comment
Recommended Posts