+StarBrand Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 For What it is worth: Analysis of file C:\fizzy\359838.gpx 235 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.58 Avg. Terrain = 1.50 Avg. Challenge = 1.76 25 hard caches (11%) 1 countries 9 US states Difficulty: 1.0: 101 (43.0%) 1.5: 42 (17.9%) 2.0: 63 (26.8%) 2.5: 14 ( 6.0%) 3.0: 13 ( 5.5%) 3.5: 1 ( 0.4%) 4.5: 1 ( 0.4%) Terrain: 1.0: 114 (48.5%) 1.5: 54 (23.0%) 2.0: 39 (16.6%) 2.5: 15 ( 6.4%) 3.0: 10 ( 4.3%) 3.5: 1 ( 0.4%) 4.0: 1 ( 0.4%) 5.0: 1 ( 0.4%) Cache types: 2 ( 0.9%) Cache In Trash Out Event 1 ( 0.4%) Earthcache 8 ( 3.4%) Event Cache 1 ( 0.4%) Letterbox Hybrid 3 ( 1.3%) Multi-cache 204 (86.8%) Traditional Cache 2 ( 0.9%) Unknown Cache 14 ( 6.0%) Virtual Cache Containers: 49 (20.9%) Micro 11 ( 4.7%) Not chosen 17 ( 7.2%) Other 129 (54.9%) Regular 17 ( 7.2%) Small 12 ( 5.1%) Virtual Countries: 235 in United States US States: 2 in Arizona 29 in Colorado 1 in Iowa 110 in Nebraska 7 in Nevada 2 in North Dakota 15 in South Dakota 3 in Utah 66 in Wyoming Quote
+Right Wing Wacko Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 When I try to run my "FOUND.GPX" generated from GSAK thru it the program laughs at me and asks me if I should send my shame to someone at Microsoft for debugging. I had to get my "found.gpx" from Groundspeaks to get anything meaningfull. I wonder of this could be done with a GSAK macro? Analysis of file E:\Geocaching\PocketPC\found.gpx 1389 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.67 Avg. Terrain = 1.54 Avg. Challenge = 1.86 181 hard caches (13%) 2 countries 4 US states Difficulty: 1.0: 446 (32.1%) 1.5: 409 (29.4%) 2.0: 319 (23.0%) 2.5: 103 ( 7.4%) 3.0: 75 ( 5.4%) 3.5: 20 ( 1.4%) 4.0: 13 ( 0.9%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.1%) 5.0: 2 ( 0.1%) Terrain: 1.0: 588 (42.3%) 1.5: 422 (30.4%) 2.0: 207 (14.9%) 2.5: 81 ( 5.8%) 3.0: 63 ( 4.5%) 3.5: 13 ( 0.9%) 4.0: 6 ( 0.4%) 5.0: 9 ( 0.6%) Cache types: 2 ( 0.1%) Cache In Trash Out Event 1 ( 0.1%) Earthcache 45 ( 3.2%) Event Cache 1 ( 0.1%) Letterbox Hybrid 4 ( 0.3%) Locationless (Reverse) Cache 74 ( 5.3%) Multi-cache 1 ( 0.1%) Project APE Cache 1197 (86.2%) Traditional Cache 38 ( 2.7%) Unknown Cache 22 ( 1.6%) Virtual Cache 4 ( 0.3%) Webcam Cache Containers: 9 ( 0.6%) Large 439 (31.6%) Micro 74 ( 5.3%) Not chosen 35 ( 2.5%) Other 724 (52.1%) Regular 85 ( 6.1%) Small 23 ( 1.7%) Virtual Countries: 2 in Canada 1383 in United States US States: 6 in Idaho 1 in Louisiana 74 in Oregon 1302 in Washington Quote
+pwcorg Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Overall the numbers are lower than I would have thought. I wonder, though, if this is symptomatic of caching habits or a reflection of the caches available. I say we run the numbers for all active caches and see what we get. Quote
+Miragee Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 My terrain numbers are lower than I would like, but it gets so hot here in the summer that I can't do any long hikes, which are my preferred caches. My overall numbers might not be much higher in a few months, but I hope the terrain average will have increased because it is possible to hike again, or will be on non-rainy days. Quote
+Moose Mob Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Checking my earlier postings... I have 128 T3+ caches, which leaves over 1100 caches T2.5 and lower. Rounding off, thats 1 in 10 are of a higher terrain level. Quote
+tozainamboku Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 I wonder of this could be done with a GSAK macro? I have a GSAK macro that does the same but it is awfully slow, so here is one that takes your current filter set and runs fizzymagic's program ############################################################## ## GSAK Macro to dump current filter set to GPX, then open ## the GPX in fizzymagic's FindStats program and display the ## results. ############################################################## DEBUG Status=Off # Set Default Path to FindStats. If it's not there, check to see # if we've previously saved it, and read it from there. If it's # not saved, ask the user where it is, test it, and save it if # the file exists. If not, cancel because we're screwed SET $DefaultPath="C:\Program Files\fizzymagic\" IF .NOT. (FileExists($DefaultPath + "FindStats.exe")) SET $DataPath=$_Install + "\Macros\GPX-FindStats.dat" IF (FileExists($DataPath)) SET $DefaultPath=GETFILE($DataPath) IF Left($DefaultPath, 7) = "*Error*" CANCEL Msg="$DefaultPath" ENDIF ENDIF IF .NOT. (FileExists($DefaultPath + "FindStats.exe")) INPUT Msg="Enter the full path (drive + directory + trailing \) that contains FindStats.exe." Default="$DefaultPath" VarName=$UserPath IF .NOT. (FileExists($UserPath + "FindStats.exe")) CANCEL Msg="FindStats.exe still not found. Check the path and try again." ENDIF SET $DefaultPath=$UserPath SET $Error=PUTFILE($DataPath, $DefaultPath) IF Left($Error, 7) = "*Error*" PAUSE Msg = "$Error" ENDIF ENDIF ENDIF SET $FullPath=$DefaultPath + "FindStats.exe" # Filename to export SET $GPXFile=$DefaultPath + "FromGSAK.GPX" SET $ResultsFile=$DefaultPath + "FromGSAK.GPX.dat" # Export to GPX EXPORT Type="GPX" File="$GPXFile" # Did the export go OK? IF .NOT. FileExists($GPXFile) CANCEL Msg="Export failed. You probably need to set some default values in the File\Export\GPX/LOC File... dialog." ENDIF # Run FindStats with GPX file as argument RUNPGM Pgm="$FullPath" Parms="$GPXFile" Wait=Yes # Open results RUNPGM Pgm="Notepad" Parms="$ResultsFile" Quote
+tozainamboku Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 I didn't expect this My finds excluding events and CITO 1712 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.77 Avg. Terrain = 1.71 Avg. Challenge = 2.08 406 hard caches (24%) 1 countries 4 US states 1000 closest non-archived (includes disabled) caches (excluding events, CITO and locationless) 1000 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.73 Avg. Terrain = 1.71 Avg. Challenge = 2.05 235 hard caches (24%) 1 countries 1 US states I thought I did a lot more difficult caches than other people around here (and perhaps I do) but it looks like the caches I do are roughly in the same proportion as the caches available for me to do. Quote
+JimmyEv Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 This is a hoot. Proof that Houston is flat and urban: FOUND: 1397 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.61 Avg. Terrain = 1.50 Avg. Challenge = 1.76 154 hard caches (11%) 1 countries 7 US states 342 (24.5%) archived Oldest cache: #515 (GC203) Newest cache: #312748 (GCR97J) Difficulty: 1.0: 535 (38.3%) 1.5: 375 (26.8%) 2.0: 287 (20.5%) 2.5: 96 ( 6.9%) 3.0: 72 ( 5.2%) 3.5: 18 ( 1.3%) 4.0: 12 ( 0.9%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.1%) Terrain: 1.0: 666 (47.7%) 1.5: 345 (24.7%) 2.0: 226 (16.2%) 2.5: 85 ( 6.1%) 3.0: 47 ( 3.4%) 3.5: 20 ( 1.4%) 4.0: 7 ( 0.5%) 5.0: 1 ( 0.1%) Cache types: 1 ( 0.1%) Event Cache 4 ( 0.3%) Letterbox Hybrid 105 ( 7.5%) Multi-cache 1134 (81.2%) Traditional Cache 45 ( 3.2%) Unknown Cache 108 ( 7.7%) Virtual Cache Containers: 9 ( 0.6%) Large 412 (29.5%) Micro 66 ( 4.7%) Not chosen 64 ( 4.6%) Other 622 (44.5%) Regular 138 ( 9.9%) Small 86 ( 6.2%) Virtual Countries: 1397 in United States US States: 1 in Arizona 3 in Louisiana 15 in Nevada 15 in North Carolina 11 in Pennsylvania 1344 in Texas 8 in Virginia HOUSTON: Avg. Difficulty = 1.66 Avg. Terrain = 1.45 Avg. Challenge = 1.78 72 hard caches (14%) 1 countries 1 US states 0 (0.0%) archived Oldest cache: #2240 (GC8C0) Newest cache: #321749 (GCRJJY) Difficulty: 1.0: 192 (38.4%) 1.5: 141 (28.2%) 2.0: 84 (16.8%) 2.5: 26 ( 5.2%) 3.0: 35 ( 7.0%) 3.5: 10 ( 2.0%) 4.0: 5 ( 1.0%) 4.5: 5 ( 1.0%) 5.0: 2 ( 0.4%) Terrain: 1.0: 228 (45.6%) 1.5: 169 (33.8%) 2.0: 63 (12.6%) 2.5: 16 ( 3.2%) 3.0: 16 ( 3.2%) 3.5: 6 ( 1.2%) 4.0: 1 ( 0.2%) 5.0: 1 ( 0.2%) Cache types: 2 ( 0.4%) Event Cache 1 ( 0.2%) Letterbox Hybrid 1 ( 0.2%) Locationless (Reverse) Cache 41 ( 8.2%) Multi-cache 353 (70.6%) Traditional Cache 74 (14.8%) Unknown Cache 28 ( 5.6%) Virtual Cache Containers: 3 ( 0.6%) Large 181 (36.2%) Micro 28 ( 5.6%) Not chosen 21 ( 4.2%) Other 165 (33.0%) Regular 78 (15.6%) Small 24 ( 4.8%) Virtual And proof that I can't find hard caches or solve puzzles: CLOSEST UNFOUND: Avg. Difficulty = 2.02 Avg. Terrain = 1.86 Avg. Challenge = 2.26 136 hard caches (27%) 1 countries 1 US states 0 (0.0%) archived Oldest cache: #1180 (GC49C) Newest cache: #321749 (GCRJJY) Difficulty: 1.0: 103 (20.6%) 1.5: 128 (25.6%) 2.0: 125 (25.0%) 2.5: 34 ( 6.8%) 3.0: 69 (13.8%) 3.5: 12 ( 2.4%) 4.0: 13 ( 2.6%) 4.5: 6 ( 1.2%) 5.0: 10 ( 2.0%) Terrain: 1.0: 108 (21.6%) 1.5: 211 (42.2%) 2.0: 91 (18.2%) 2.5: 25 ( 5.0%) 3.0: 24 ( 4.8%) 3.5: 8 ( 1.6%) 4.0: 4 ( 0.8%) 4.5: 1 ( 0.2%) 5.0: 28 ( 5.6%) Cache types: 2 ( 0.4%) Event Cache 2 ( 0.4%) Locationless (Reverse) Cache 43 ( 8.6%) Multi-cache 315 (63.0%) Traditional Cache 134 (26.8%) Unknown Cache 1 ( 0.2%) Virtual Cache 3 ( 0.6%) Webcam Cache Containers: 3 ( 0.6%) Large 162 (32.4%) Micro 22 ( 4.4%) Not chosen 8 ( 1.6%) Other 187 (37.4%) Regular 115 (23.0%) Small 3 ( 0.6%) Virtual Quote
+pwcorg Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Overall the numbers are lower than I would have thought. I wonder, though, if this is symptomatic of caching habits or a reflection of the caches available. I say we run the numbers for all active caches and see what we get. Ran the numbers for the closest 500 caches to my house. 500 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.84 Avg. Terrain = 1.71 Avg. Challenge = 2.06 102 hard caches (20%) 1 countries 2 US states Difficulty: 1.0: 113 (22.6%) 1.5: 143 (28.6%) 2.0: 128 (25.6%) 2.5: 58 (11.6%) 3.0: 33 ( 6.6%) 3.5: 17 ( 3.4%) 4.0: 5 ( 1.0%) 4.5: 1 ( 0.2%) 5.0: 2 ( 0.4%) Terrain: 1.0: 178 (35.6%) 1.5: 136 (27.2%) 2.0: 91 (18.2%) 2.5: 42 ( 8.4%) 3.0: 29 ( 5.8%) 3.5: 11 ( 2.2%) 4.0: 6 ( 1.2%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.4%) 5.0: 5 ( 1.0%) Cache types: 1 ( 0.2%) Event Cache 30 ( 6.0%) Multi-cache 435 (87.0%) Traditional Cache 26 ( 5.2%) Unknown Cache 6 ( 1.2%) Virtual Cache 2 ( 0.4%) Webcam Cache Containers: 2 ( 0.4%) Large 203 (40.6%) Micro 14 ( 2.8%) Not chosen 8 ( 1.6%) Other 212 (42.4%) Regular 57 (11.4%) Small 4 ( 0.8%) Virtual Countries: 500 in United States US States: 320 in Florida 180 in Georgia Quote
+StarBrand Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 My active hides this time: Analysis of file C:\fizzy\379721.gpx 53 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.82 Avg. Terrain = 1.87 Avg. Challenge = 2.01 6 hard caches (11%) 1 countries 2 US states 0 (0.0%) archived Oldest cache: #11780 (GC2E04) Newest cache: #317605 (GCRE98) Difficulty: 1.0: 8 (15.1%) 1.5: 17 (32.1%) 2.0: 17 (32.1%) 2.5: 8 (15.1%) 3.0: 3 ( 5.7%) Terrain: 1.0: 2 ( 3.8%) 1.5: 25 (47.2%) 2.0: 17 (32.1%) 2.5: 5 ( 9.4%) 3.0: 2 ( 3.8%) 3.5: 2 ( 3.8%) Cache types: 1 ( 1.9%) Earthcache 1 ( 1.9%) Event Cache 1 ( 1.9%) Multi-cache 48 (90.6%) Traditional Cache 2 ( 3.8%) Virtual Cache Containers: 4 ( 7.5%) Micro 2 ( 3.8%) Not chosen 1 ( 1.9%) Other 37 (69.8%) Regular 7 (13.2%) Small 2 ( 3.8%) Virtual Countries: 53 in United States US States: 42 in Nebraska 11 in Wyoming Quote
markandlynn Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Nice idea. My stats are here UK only but hey its easier than downloading an application and a PQ In case you cant acces these heres a print out. 111 caching trips between 2003-05-05 and 2006-06-06 Been in the sport 1129 days Hidden 1 cache for every 19.5 caches found Found 292 caches during 94 trips, between 2003-05-05 and 2005-11-27 Average 3.1 caches found per trip Caches were found in 16 counties The terrain of these caches ranged from 1.0 to 5.0, average 2.0 The total terrain of these caches was 596.5 The difficulty of these caches ranged from 1.0 to 5.0, average 2.0 The total difficulty of these caches was 577.5 The total (difficulty + terrain) of these caches was 1174.0 The total distance between these caches was 4894 miles This cacher has defiled 17 virgin caches Hidden 15 caches during 14 trips, between 2004-05-03 and 2006-06-06 Average 1.1 caches hidden per trip Caches were hidden in 3 counties The terrain of these caches ranged from 1.5 to 3.0, average 1.9 The total terrain of these caches was 28.0 The difficulty of these caches ranged from 1.5 to 5.0, average 2.7 The total difficulty of these caches was 41.0 The total (difficulty + terrain) of these caches was 69.0 The total distance between these caches was 254 miles Quote
+pwcorg Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 My hides. I love this tool. 20 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 2.38 Avg. Terrain = 1.38 Avg. Challenge = 2.52 10 hard caches (50%) 1 countries 1 US states 0 (0.0%) archived Oldest cache: #173167 (GCKJZZ) Newest cache: #313127 (GCR9KT) Difficulty: 1.0: 4 (20.0%) 1.5: 2 (10.0%) 2.0: 2 (10.0%) 2.5: 4 (20.0%) 3.0: 3 (15.0%) 3.5: 5 (25.0%) Terrain: 1.0: 12 (60.0%) 1.5: 5 (25.0%) 2.0: 1 ( 5.0%) 3.0: 2 (10.0%) Cache types: 3 (15.0%) Multi-cache 16 (80.0%) Traditional Cache 1 ( 5.0%) Unknown Cache Containers: 11 (55.0%) Micro 2 (10.0%) Not chosen 4 (20.0%) Regular 3 (15.0%) Small Countries: 20 in United States US States: 20 in Georgia Quote
+CharlieP Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Another fun geo-software gadget from FizzyMagic. Here are my results, but I don't remember doing a cache in Texas. 746 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.94 Avg. Terrain = 1.82 Avg. Challenge = 2.20 203 hard caches (27%) 2 countries 15 US states 196 (26.3%) archived Oldest cache: #32 (GC20) Newest cache: #315254 (GCRBVD) Difficulty: 1.0: 201 (26.9%) 1.5: 153 (20.5%) 2.0: 182 (24.4%) 2.5: 79 (10.6%) 3.0: 67 ( 9.0%) 3.5: 28 ( 3.8%) 4.0: 19 ( 2.5%) 4.5: 7 ( 0.9%) 5.0: 10 ( 1.3%) Terrain: 1.0: 244 (32.7%) 1.5: 185 (24.8%) 2.0: 140 (18.8%) 2.5: 62 ( 8.3%) 3.0: 55 ( 7.4%) 3.5: 27 ( 3.6%) 4.0: 20 ( 2.7%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.3%) 5.0: 11 ( 1.5%) Cache types: 2 ( 0.3%) Cache In Trash Out Event 1 ( 0.1%) Earthcache 28 ( 3.8%) Event Cache 3 ( 0.4%) Letterbox Hybrid 94 (12.6%) Multi-cache 1 ( 0.1%) Project APE Cache 509 (68.2%) Traditional Cache 60 ( 8.0%) Unknown Cache 47 ( 6.3%) Virtual Cache 1 ( 0.1%) Webcam Cache Containers: 5 ( 0.7%) Large 177 (23.7%) Micro 62 ( 8.3%) Not chosen 36 ( 4.8%) Other 412 (55.2%) Regular 15 ( 2.0%) Small 39 ( 5.2%) Virtual Countries: 3 in Cayman Islands 743 in United States US States: 21 in Alabama 4 in California 41 in Florida 606 in Georgia 1 in Indiana 13 in Kentucky 8 in Louisiana 6 in Mississippi 4 in Nebraska 1 in North Carolina 18 in South Carolina 16 in Tennessee 1 in Texas 2 in Virginia 1 in West Virginia Quote
+briansnat Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 (edited) Fizzy keeps improving this. Here is my stuff with the latest program: My finds 426 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.88 Avg. Terrain = 2.02 Avg. Challenge = 2.19 107 hard caches (25%) 1 countries 9 US states 125 (29.3%) archived Oldest cache: #200 (GCC8) Newest cache: #311685 (GCR849) Difficulty: 1.0: 91 (21.4%) 1.5: 99 (23.2%) 2.0: 122 (28.6%) 2.5: 59 (13.8%) 3.0: 47 (11.0%) 3.5: 5 ( 1.2%) 4.0: 1 ( 0.2%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.5%) Terrain: 1.0: 83 (19.5%) 1.5: 104 (24.4%) 2.0: 91 (21.4%) 2.5: 64 (15.0%) 3.0: 50 (11.7%) 3.5: 17 ( 4.0%) 4.0: 12 ( 2.8%) 4.5: 3 ( 0.7%) 5.0: 2 ( 0.5%) Cache types: 1 ( 0.2%) Cache In Trash Out Event 14 ( 3.3%) Event Cache 1 ( 0.2%) Letterbox Hybrid 6 ( 1.4%) Locationless (Reverse) Cache 29 ( 6.8%) Multi-cache 342 (80.3%) Traditional Cache 16 ( 3.8%) Unknown Cache 17 ( 4.0%) Virtual Cache Containers: 5 ( 1.2%) Large 70 (16.4%) Micro 21 ( 4.9%) Not chosen 18 ( 4.2%) Other 264 (62.0%) Regular 25 ( 5.9%) Small 23 ( 5.4%) Virtual Countries: 420 in United States US States: 13 in California 6 in Connecticut 1 in Delaware 4 in Maryland 283 in New Jersey 69 in New York 23 in Pennsylvania 15 in Vermont 6 in Virginia My active hides 103 unique caches fohidden. Avg. Difficulty = 1.85 Avg. Terrain = 2.27 Avg. Challenge = 2.38 26 hard caches (25%) 1 countries 3 US states Oldest cache: #8387 (GC20C3) Newest cache: #318870 (GCRFK2) Difficulty: 1.0: 9 ( 8.7%) 1.5: 31 (30.1%) 2.0: 47 (45.6%) 2.5: 14 (13.6%) 3.0: 2 ( 1.9%) Terrain: 1.0: 4 ( 3.9%) 1.5: 26 (25.2%) 2.0: 22 (21.4%) 2.5: 27 (26.2%) 3.0: 14 (13.6%) 3.5: 8 ( 7.8%) 4.0: 1 ( 1.0%) 5.0: 1 ( 1.0%) Cache types: 17 (16.5%) Multi-cache 77 (74.8%) Traditional Cache 5 ( 4.9%) Unknown Cache 4 ( 3.9%) Virtual Cache Containers: 5 ( 4.9%) Micro 2 ( 1.9%) Other 67 (65.0%) Regular 27 (26.2%) Small 2 ( 1.9%) Virtual Countries: 103 in United States US States: 98 in New Jersey 2 in New York 3 in Vermont 500 closest to my Zipcode (only 13 percent micros, how cool is that! 500 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 2.06 Avg. Terrain = 2.22 Avg. Challenge = 2.42 160 hard caches (32%) 1 countries 2 US states 0 (0.0%) archived Oldest cache: #200 (GCC8) Newest cache: #321233 (GCRJ29) Difficulty: 1.0: 45 ( 9.0%) 1.5: 110 (22.0%) 2.0: 174 (34.8%) 2.5: 106 (21.2%) 3.0: 52 (10.4%) 3.5: 3 ( 0.6%) 4.0: 6 ( 1.2%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.4%) 5.0: 2 ( 0.4%) Terrain: 1.0: 44 ( 8.8%) 1.5: 116 (23.2%) 2.0: 113 (22.6%) 2.5: 103 (20.6%) 3.0: 82 (16.4%) 3.5: 22 ( 4.4%) 4.0: 15 ( 3.0%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.4%) 5.0: 3 ( 0.6%) Cache types: 1 ( 0.2%) Earthcache 80 (16.0%) Multi-cache 382 (76.4%) Traditional Cache 35 ( 7.0%) Unknown Cache 2 ( 0.4%) Virtual Cache Containers: 68 (13.6%) Micro 14 ( 2.8%) Not chosen 10 ( 2.0%) Other 320 (64.0%) Regular 87 (17.4%) Small 1 ( 0.2%) Virtual Countries: 500 in United States US States: 495 in New Jersey 5 in New York Edited December 9, 2005 by briansnat Quote
+CharlieP Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Going back to the original question about whether there is an inverse relationship between number of finds and average difficulty found, just scanning the posted stats it looks like this may be true. But then, this is not a valid sample, and there are a few cachers with both high finds and high difficulty ratios, e.g., tozainamboku with 1712/24%. If these type of stats were incorporated into the geocaching.com reporting system, it might help improve the average rating of cache placements. But then, it would also probably result in "rating creep" ... if you define a game, people will play. FWIW, CharlieP Quote
+pwcorg Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Going back to the original question about whether there is an inverse relationship between number of finds and average difficulty found, just scanning the posted stats it looks like this may be true. But then, this is not a valid sample, and there are a few cachers with both high finds and high difficulty ratios, e.g., tozainamboku with 1712/24%. If these type of stats were incorporated into the geocaching.com reporting system, it might help improve the average rating of cache placements. But then, it would also probably result in "rating creep" ... if you define a game, people will play. FWIW, CharlieP Again. I see it not so much that, but a direct relationship between caches found and those available to be found. If there are more "easy" caches out there than "hard" caches then obviously ones "easy" find count will be higher. Quote
+CharlieP Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Again. I see it not so much that, but a direct relationship between caches found and those available to be found. If there are more "easy" caches out there than "hard" caches then obviously ones "easy" find count will be higher. That would imply that all cachers in a given area would tend to have a similar cache found difficulty ratio. I would be very surprised if that were true. Quote
+pwcorg Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Again. I see it not so much that, but a direct relationship between caches found and those available to be found. If there are more "easy" caches out there than "hard" caches then obviously ones "easy" find count will be higher. That would imply that all cachers in a given area would tend to have a similar cache found difficulty ratio. I would be very surprised if that were true. Only if they have the same caching habits. I travel for work and have found most of my caches outside of what I consider my "home" area. whrere as a friend of mine caches almost exclusively in his local area. I'm talking more global than regional or local. I maintain that there are a lot more difficulty 2 cahces out there than there are difficulty 4. So it stands to reason that more 2's are found than are 4's. Quote
+ToTheSummit Posted December 11, 2005 Posted December 11, 2005 Here are some stats from a beginner (that'd be me). I logged my first find less then a month ago. 36 caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.96 Avg. Terrain = 2.39 Avg. Challenge = 2.54 19 hard caches found (53%) I doubt that I'll keep that ratio of hard finds over 50%, but you can see why I got into caching in the first place. I love to see terrain ratings of 3.5 stars or more. If my legs are burning when I find the cache then I'm happy! Quote
n0wae Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Very cool program! I had *no* idea that 23+ percent of the caches I've found are now archived! A statistic of how many 'last to find' caches would be interesting. (Hopefully my numbers in that department are low). 1242 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.72 Avg. Terrain = 1.60 Avg. Challenge = 1.92 204 hard caches (16%) 1 countries 4 US states 292 (23.5%) archived Oldest cache: #24 (GC18) Newest cache: #316645 (GCRD99) Difficulty: 1.0: 419 (33.7%) 1.5: 274 (22.1%) 2.0: 326 (26.2%) 2.5: 101 ( 8.1%) 3.0: 82 ( 6.6%) 3.5: 22 ( 1.8%) 4.0: 13 ( 1.0%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.2%) 5.0: 3 ( 0.2%) Terrain: 1.0: 559 (45.0%) 1.5: 312 (25.1%) 2.0: 169 (13.6%) 2.5: 88 ( 7.1%) 3.0: 61 ( 4.9%) 3.5: 17 ( 1.4%) 4.0: 23 ( 1.9%) 4.5: 4 ( 0.3%) 5.0: 9 ( 0.7%) Cache types: 3 ( 0.2%) Cache In Trash Out Event 4 ( 0.3%) Earthcache 5 ( 0.4%) Event Cache 4 ( 0.3%) Letterbox Hybrid 13 ( 1.0%) Locationless (Reverse) Cache 99 ( 8.0%) Multi-cache 958 (77.1%) Traditional Cache 26 ( 2.1%) Unknown Cache 129 (10.4%) Virtual Cache 1 ( 0.1%) Webcam Cache Containers: 13 ( 1.0%) Large 281 (22.6%) Micro 70 ( 5.6%) Not chosen 46 ( 3.7%) Other 584 (47.0%) Regular 127 (10.2%) Small 121 ( 9.7%) Virtual Countries: 1229 in United States US States: 8 in Alabama 1212 in Colorado 1 in Tennessee 8 in Wyoming Quote
+fizzymagic Posted December 12, 2005 Author Posted December 12, 2005 I have posted a new version. Try it. I am now parsing logs and obtaining helpful statistics from them. Unfortunately, this new version is no longer so useful for analyzing your local caches. I am going to fix that in the near future. As always, you can get it here. Quote
+altosaxplayer Posted December 12, 2005 Posted December 12, 2005 Way to complicated for me....... Easier way. Most of my finds are about a 2 average. Quote
+bigcall Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Jumping in late.... 1571 unique caches. 47702 finds logged. Avg. Difficulty = 1.71 Avg. Terrain = 1.68 Avg. Challenge = 1.93 266 hard caches (17%) 2 countries 28 US states 1535 multiple finds (3%) 322 (20.5%) archived Oldest cache: #236 (GCEC) Newest cache: #316722 (GCRDBR) Interesting stuff, thanks!!! Quote
+Moose Mob Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 I seem to be playing cxatch up here. It seems we added some more stuff such as cache container size. Containers: 42 ( 3.4%) Large 263 (21.0%) Micro 37 ( 3.0%) Not chosen 65 ( 5.2%) Other 647 (51.7%) Regular 107 ( 8.6%) Small 90 ( 7.2%) Virtual I was surprised to see well over half of my physical cache finds were regular or larger. Also the Oldest cache: #121 (GC79) & Newest cache: #317434 (GCRE3Q) stuff. How do we get the program to do side by side? Say, if we give it more than one file off the command line? Quote
+Jennifer&Dean Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Interesting! I love stats. Since we do lots of easy ones when traveling, I expected to be really low. The 20.5% archived was a suprise though! 1232 unique caches. 1241 finds logged. Avg. Difficulty = 1.74 Avg. Terrain = 1.53 Avg. Challenge = 1.92 204 hard caches (17%) 1 countries 28 US states 3 multiple finds (0%) 253 (20.5%) archived Oldest cache: #40 (GC28) Newest cache: #312741 (GCR97B) Difficulty: 1.0: 434 (35.2%) 1.5: 267 (21.7%) 2.0: 269 (21.8%) 2.5: 114 ( 9.3%) 3.0: 98 ( 8.0%) 3.5: 25 ( 2.0%) 4.0: 15 ( 1.2%) 4.5: 4 ( 0.3%) 5.0: 6 ( 0.5%) Terrain: 1.0: 575 (46.7%) 1.5: 308 (25.0%) 2.0: 169 (13.7%) 2.5: 96 ( 7.8%) 3.0: 54 ( 4.4%) 3.5: 20 ( 1.6%) 4.0: 9 ( 0.7%) 5.0: 1 ( 0.1%) Cache types: 6 ( 0.5%) Cache In Trash Out Event 1 ( 0.1%) Earthcache 29 ( 2.4%) Event Cache 4 ( 0.3%) Letterbox Hybrid 5 ( 0.4%) Locationless (Reverse) Cache 80 ( 6.5%) Multi-cache 1 ( 0.1%) Project APE Cache 963 (78.2%) Traditional Cache 42 ( 3.4%) Unknown Cache 98 ( 8.0%) Virtual Cache 3 ( 0.2%) Webcam Cache Containers: 6 ( 0.5%) Large 346 (28.1%) Micro 72 ( 5.8%) Not chosen 42 ( 3.4%) Other 572 (46.4%) Regular 102 ( 8.3%) Small 92 ( 7.5%) Virtual Countries: 1227 in United States US States: 11 in Arizona 34 in California 26 in Colorado 3 in Delaware 6 in Florida 177 in Idaho 57 in Illinois 11 in Indiana 15 in Iowa 1 in Kansas 1 in Louisiana 1 in Maryland 13 in Minnesota 24 in Missouri 533 in Montana 2 in Nebraska 11 in Nevada 9 in New Mexico 2 in New York 11 in North Dakota 7 in Oregon 14 in Pennsylvania 13 in South Dakota 2 in Texas 54 in Utah 140 in Washington 15 in Wisconsin 34 in Wyoming Quote
+Jennifer&Dean Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Of the 500 closest ones we haven't found: 500 unique caches. Avg. Difficulty = 2.06 Avg. Terrain = 2.46 Avg. Challenge = 2.63 237 hard caches (47%) 1 countries 2 US states 0 (0.0%) archived Oldest cache: #38 (GC26) Newest cache: #318281 (GCRF02) Difficulty: 1.0: 99 (19.8%) 1.5: 96 (19.2%) 2.0: 145 (29.0%) 2.5: 53 (10.6%) 3.0: 63 (12.6%) 3.5: 17 ( 3.4%) 4.0: 17 ( 3.4%) 4.5: 3 ( 0.6%) 5.0: 7 ( 1.4%) Terrain: 1.0: 86 (17.2%) 1.5: 61 (12.2%) 2.0: 87 (17.4%) 2.5: 56 (11.2%) 3.0: 89 (17.8%) 3.5: 53 (10.6%) 4.0: 47 ( 9.4%) 4.5: 12 ( 2.4%) 5.0: 9 ( 1.8%) Cache types: 1 ( 0.2%) Event Cache 1 ( 0.2%) Letterbox Hybrid 30 ( 6.0%) Multi-cache 451 (90.2%) Traditional Cache 6 ( 1.2%) Unknown Cache 11 ( 2.2%) Virtual Cache Containers: 3 ( 0.6%) Large 52 (10.4%) Micro 5 ( 1.0%) Not chosen 19 ( 3.8%) Other 353 (70.6%) Regular 57 (11.4%) Small 11 ( 2.2%) Virtual US States: 249 in Idaho 251 in Montana Quote
+geospyder Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 Here are my stats... 566 unique caches. Avg. Difficulty = 1.82 Avg. Terrain = 1.63 Avg. Challenge = 2.05 128 hard caches (23%) 3 countries 6 US states 33 (5.8%) archived Oldest cache: #2118 (GC846) Newest cache: #322178 (GCRK1R) Difficulty: 1.0: 170 (30.0%) 1.5: 141 (24.9%) 2.0: 130 (23.0%) 2.5: 45 ( 8.0%) 3.0: 44 ( 7.8%) 3.5: 15 ( 2.7%) 4.0: 13 ( 2.3%) 4.5: 5 ( 0.9%) 5.0: 3 ( 0.5%) Terrain: 1.0: 263 (46.5%) 1.5: 121 (21.4%) 2.0: 75 (13.3%) 2.5: 36 ( 6.4%) 3.0: 40 ( 7.1%) 3.5: 11 ( 1.9%) 4.0: 17 ( 3.0%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.4%) 5.0: 1 ( 0.2%) Cache types: 7 ( 1.2%) Event Cache 1 ( 0.2%) Letterbox Hybrid 29 ( 5.1%) Multi-cache 480 (84.8%) Traditional Cache 17 ( 3.0%) Unknown Cache 30 ( 5.3%) Virtual Cache 2 ( 0.4%) Webcam Cache Containers: 5 ( 0.9%) Large 151 (26.7%) Micro 23 ( 4.1%) Not chosen 13 ( 2.3%) Other 267 (47.2%) Regular 79 (14.0%) Small 28 ( 4.9%) Virtual Countries: 7 in Luxembourg 11 in Netherlands 548 in United States US States: 105 in California 33 in Florida 9 in Nebraska 388 in Nevada 9 in Utah 4 in Wyoming Quote
+geospyder Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 OK - I'm confused. I chose two caches, neither of which I found. One was a 5/5 and the other was a 1/1. I ran these through the fizzymagic thing and here are the results: What are the following? 9 finds logged 2 multiple finds (22%) Multiple Finds: 5 finds claimed on GCG62F 4 finds claimed on GCQY40 Analysis of file C:\Program Files\fizzymagic\FromGSAK.gpx 2 unique caches. 9 finds logged. Avg. Difficulty = 3.00 Avg. Terrain = 3.00 Avg. Challenge = 3.00 1 hard caches (50%) 1 countries 2 US states 2 multiple finds (22%) 0 (0.0%) archived Oldest cache: #71379 (GCG62F) Newest cache: #302066 (GCQY40) Difficulty: 1.0: 1 (50.0%) 5.0: 1 (50.0%) Terrain: 1.0: 1 (50.0%) 5.0: 1 (50.0%) Cache types: 2 (100.0%) Traditional Cache Containers: 1 (50.0%) Regular 1 (50.0%) Small Countries: 2 in United States US States: 1 in California 1 in Nevada Multiple Finds: 5 finds claimed on GCG62F 4 finds claimed on GCQY40 Quote
+fizzymagic Posted December 15, 2005 Author Posted December 15, 2005 OK - I'm confused. I chose two caches, neither of which I found. One was a 5/5 and the other was a 1/1. I ran these through the fizzymagic thing and here are the results: Why are you confused? There were 9 logs on those two caches. FindStats is intended to process your All Finds PQ. It tells you how many logs there are on all the caches in the file. I will soon be releasing HideStats, which is intended to analyze other PQs besides the special All Finds one. That one will have different statistics more suited to regular PQs. Quote
+Moose Mob Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 ...I will soon be releasing HideStats, which is intended to analyze other PQs besides the special All Finds one. That one will have different statistics more suited to regular PQs. Awesome. GUI? Graphs? Quote
+cachew nut Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 These are my finds. A couple of pieces of data are skewed by multiple finds on a travelling locationless cache, and another travelling locationless that died in Montana, I found it in Illinois. I haven't been to Montana yet. The rest looks ok. 876 unique caches. 879 finds logged. Avg. Difficulty = 1.67 Avg. Terrain = 1.55 Avg. Challenge = 1.84 96 hard caches (11%) 2 countries 19 US states 1 multiple finds (0%) 315 (36.0%) archived Oldest cache: #40 (GC28) Newest cache: #318035 (GCREQ4) Difficulty: 1.0: 280 (32.0%) 1.5: 229 (26.1%) 2.0: 253 (28.9%) 2.5: 60 ( 6.8%) 3.0: 32 ( 3.7%) 3.5: 14 ( 1.6%) 4.0: 4 ( 0.5%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.2%) 5.0: 2 ( 0.2%) Terrain: 1.0: 362 (41.3%) 1.5: 254 (29.0%) 2.0: 151 (17.2%) 2.5: 56 ( 6.4%) 3.0: 40 ( 4.6%) 3.5: 9 ( 1.0%) 4.0: 3 ( 0.3%) 5.0: 1 ( 0.1%) Cache types: 1 ( 0.1%) Cache In Trash Out Event 3 ( 0.3%) Earthcache 5 ( 0.6%) Event Cache 8 ( 0.9%) Locationless (Reverse) Cache 57 ( 6.5%) Multi-cache 714 (81.5%) Traditional Cache 35 ( 4.0%) Unknown Cache 53 ( 6.1%) Virtual Cache Containers: 8 ( 0.9%) Large 316 (36.1%) Micro 54 ( 6.2%) Not chosen 34 ( 3.9%) Other 364 (41.6%) Regular 51 ( 5.8%) Small 49 ( 5.6%) Virtual Countries: 5 in Canada 863 in United States US States: 68 in California 14 in Georgia 533 in Illinois 1 in Indiana 1 in Louisiana 6 in Massachusetts 64 in Michigan 10 in Missouri 1 in Montana 1 in New Hampshire 6 in New York 57 in North Carolina 19 in Ohio 1 in Pennsylvania 38 in Texas 29 in Utah 1 in Washington 10 in Wisconsin 3 in Wyoming Multiple Finds: 4 finds claimed on GC7375 Quote
+fizzymagic Posted December 15, 2005 Author Posted December 15, 2005 ...I will soon be releasing HideStats, which is intended to analyze other PQs besides the special All Finds one. That one will have different statistics more suited to regular PQs. Awesome. GUI? Graphs? As you probably know if you've used GeoCalc, I suck at GUIs. I was thinking about making the output from FindStats HTML, so you could look at it as tables in your browser, but I haven't done that yet. Anyway, I have whipped out an app that is good for looking at regular PQs. It's called PQStats and you can get it by clicking the above link. I will also include it in the zip file that has the complete FindStats in it. Quote
+robert Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 806 unique caches found. Avg. Difficulty = 1.98 Avg. Terrain = 1.80 Avg. Challenge = 2.16 185 hard caches (23%) 1 countries 8 US states 190 (23.6%) archived Oldest cache: #509 (GC1FD) Newest cache: #320029 (GCRGTE) Difficulty: 1.0: 152 (18.9%) 1.5: 175 (21.7%) 2.0: 253 (31.4%) 2.5: 102 (12.7%) 3.0: 74 ( 9.2%) 3.5: 19 ( 2.4%) 4.0: 22 ( 2.7%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.2%) 5.0: 7 ( 0.9%) Terrain: 1.0: 227 (28.2%) 1.5: 225 (27.9%) 2.0: 173 (21.5%) 2.5: 79 ( 9.8%) 3.0: 61 ( 7.6%) 3.5: 20 ( 2.5%) 4.0: 15 ( 1.9%) 4.5: 2 ( 0.2%) 5.0: 4 ( 0.5%) Cache types: 1 ( 0.1%) Cache In Trash Out Event 1 ( 0.1%) Earthcache 26 ( 3.2%) Event Cache 5 ( 0.6%) Letterbox Hybrid 2 ( 0.2%) Locationless (Reverse) Cache 46 ( 5.7%) Multi-cache 1 ( 0.1%) Project APE Cache 674 (83.6%) Traditional Cache 22 ( 2.7%) Unknown Cache 28 ( 3.5%) Virtual Cache Containers: 9 ( 1.1%) Large 245 (30.4%) Micro 40 ( 5.0%) Not chosen 38 ( 4.7%) Other 400 (49.6%) Regular 50 ( 6.2%) Small 24 ( 3.0%) Virtual Countries: 804 in United States US States: 1 in California 2 in Delaware 20 in District of Columbia 595 in Maryland 134 in Pennsylvania 1 in Texas 1 in Utah 50 in Virginia NOTE: The Texas and Utah are traveling caches, I believe... since I've not cached in either of those two states. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.