+BravoNacho Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 (edited) I'd like a feature that enables you to locate same sized caches in a particular area i.e. micros, regular, large etc. I would also like to see a buddy list feature. I would also like to see a more integrated forum/search hybrid interface. Edited November 15, 2005 by BravoNacho Link to comment
+BlueDeuce Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 (edited) The cache search option is available in Pocket Queries. Check here: http://www.geocaching.com/subscribe/ For the forum search capabilities, I don't see how they could have more of a integrated forum/search hybrid interface then they have now. A buddy feature would be nice. Edited November 15, 2005 by BlueDeuce Link to comment
+welch Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 what is "integrated forum/search hybrid interface"???? this forum already has a search function... you want it crossbred with what? Link to comment
+Prime Suspect Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 I would also like to see a more integrated forum/search hybrid interface. I would like to see the site use object-based incremental emulation combined with a polarised exuding toolset enforcing a mandatory modular contingency, while at the same time utilizing cross-group real-time methodology. But that's probably just me. Link to comment
+Lil Devil Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 But that's probably just me. Now *that* I can agree with Link to comment
+The Leprechauns Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 I would also like to see a more integrated forum/search hybrid interface. I would like to see the site use object-based incremental emulation combined with a polarised exuding toolset enforcing a mandatory modular contingency, while at the same time utilizing cross-group real-time methodology. But that's probably just me. *Finally* a hamster-compatible platform. Thanks for having the courage to speak up to "The Man." Link to comment
+StarBrand Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 I would also like to see a more integrated forum/search hybrid interface. I would like to see the site use object-based incremental emulation combined with a polarised exuding toolset enforcing a mandatory modular contingency, while at the same time utilizing cross-group real-time methodology. But that's probably just me. If that means a buddy list - then yup I agree. Otherwise I fear it would disrupt the nutrino flow theory of divergent dimensional physics. Link to comment
+fivegallon Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 I would also like to see a more integrated forum/search hybrid interface. I would like to see the site use object-based incremental emulation combined with a polarised exuding toolset enforcing a mandatory modular contingency, while at the same time utilizing cross-group real-time methodology. But that's probably just me. If that means a buddy list - then yup I agree. Otherwise I fear it would disrupt the nutrino flow theory of divergent dimensional physics. Not only that. They would need to up-skill the hamsters in the use of the latest transmodifier they would need to install... Link to comment
+Thrak Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 I would also like to see a more integrated forum/search hybrid interface. I would like to see the site use object-based incremental emulation combined with a polarised exuding toolset enforcing a mandatory modular contingency, while at the same time utilizing cross-group real-time methodology. But that's probably just me. You can't do that without using a Flux Capacitor and that would make the feature set implementation too costly. Link to comment
+Yamahammer Posted November 15, 2005 Share Posted November 15, 2005 I would also like to see a more integrated forum/search hybrid interface. I would like to see the site use object-based incremental emulation combined with a polarised exuding toolset enforcing a mandatory modular contingency, while at the same time utilizing cross-group real-time methodology. But that's probably just me. I was thinking the very same thing. Link to comment
+BravoNacho Posted November 16, 2005 Author Share Posted November 16, 2005 I would also like to see a more integrated forum/search hybrid interface. All I meant by this is that I would like to be able to log in at geocaching.com and not have to re-login to Groundspeak.com. And where I could have forum features, topics and cache search features, watch lists, buddy lists etc. all on a single geocaching type sort of web page for a more personalized experience. Smart asses Link to comment
Jeremy Posted November 16, 2005 Share Posted November 16, 2005 I would like all of that too. The issue now is that the codebase of both sites are very different and can't function too well together. We are looking at an alternative system that will integrate better with geocaching.com (and Waymarking.com). We're in discussions now to do this but it is a several month long project. Link to comment
+mon@rch Posted November 16, 2005 Share Posted November 16, 2005 I would like to see the option of seeing who is requested to watch my caches or Travel Bugs. I don't think that would be to hard to code would it? Could open in a second page like the bookmarks? TOM Link to comment
+BravoNacho Posted November 22, 2005 Author Share Posted November 22, 2005 That would be nice. Another thing that I would like is a sentence or two / short description added under the cache that i've been watching to help me remember better what it is that I have been watching. Link to comment
+The Leprechauns Posted November 22, 2005 Share Posted November 22, 2005 The above two posters need to look at shared public bookmark lists. Link to comment
+dornole Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 If I could just search for regular caches only, that would be awesome!!! I like to go for the occasional micro myself but my kids want their swag. It takes a long time to sift through the micros and smalls to find ones they like. I'd love to search for "regulars" only. Even if there was just a symbol in the cache lists that indicated cache size (like the ones that indicate multi, virtual etc) that would be SO GREAT!! Like, green is regular and red is a micro or something. Then I woldn't have to open every single cache to find the ones we want. Link to comment
+Stunod Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 I'd love to search for "regulars" only. Even if there was just a symbol in the cache lists that indicated cache size (like the ones that indicate multi, virtual etc) that would be SO GREAT!! Like, green is regular and red is a micro or something. Then I woldn't have to open every single cache to find the ones we want. You mean a size icon like this: Located under the D/T rating on the search result page. Link to comment
+the hermit crabs Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 I'd love to search for "regulars" only. Even if there was just a symbol in the cache lists that indicated cache size (like the ones that indicate multi, virtual etc) that would be SO GREAT!! Like, green is regular and red is a micro or something. Then I woldn't have to open every single cache to find the ones we want. You mean a size icon like this: Located under the D/T rating on the search result page. Or, since you are a premium member, you could set up a Pocket Query to list only caches of "regular" or "large" size. You can also have it strip out puzzles and multis, if you're not interested in taking your kids on those. Something like: Link to comment
+dornole Posted November 25, 2005 Share Posted November 25, 2005 Thanks guys!! Duh on me for not noticing the little bar. And since you are so helpful and a fountain of information . . . . Do I need to get a non-lame GPS (as in not my $90 Garmin E-trex) to use pocket queries? Link to comment
+Lil Devil Posted November 25, 2005 Share Posted November 25, 2005 Any GPS that has a connector so you can hook it to your computer and download waypoints, is good enough to use Pocket Queries. Link to comment
+welch Posted November 25, 2005 Share Posted November 25, 2005 Do I need to get a non-lame GPS (as in not my $90 Garmin E-trex) to use pocket queries? May you be cursed to use magellans all your life Link to comment
Recommended Posts