+TrailGators Posted August 27, 2010 Posted August 27, 2010 Beware of strangers bearing gifts ... What's wrong with this picture? - or - Cox ... your friend in the digital age. Can you say "DOCSIS 3.0?" It's coming your way. Crap! That's going to kill streaming movies from Netflix. My speed is still OK for the time being... Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 (edited) Beware of strangers bearing gifts ... What's wrong with this picture? - or - Cox ... your friend in the digital age. Can you say "DOCSIS 3.0?" It's coming your way. Crap! That's going to kill streaming movies from Netflix. My speed is still OK for the time being... No lie ... streaming videos would run only six seconds before reloading for ten seconds, on and on.. Story goes like this ... one day a UPS carton showed up at my front door. Inside was a Motorola SB5101 cable modem and a letter. Said ""Your existing modem will be incompatible with our service on August 31st ." Provided was a replacement modem, no charge. Installed it and lost 72% of my download and upload speed, totally unworkable. Turned out that the modem sent to me was second-hand and already had an assigned MAC address. Down where I come from we've got a name for goods like that. Time passed, ... time passed, ... second carton arrived at my front door today. Result as follows. Now I'm steamed because Trailgators one-upped my download speed. Thanks a lot fella, I was going to feel better. Maybe you pay extra for more speed? Underlying issue is that Cox is heading toward DOCSIS 3.0 so all old DOCSIS 1.0 modems have to go bye-bye. If any of you encounter this then make sure to call the Cox technical guys at 1-888-556-1193 so that they can verify and validate the HFC MAC address that's on the nameplate under the modem. Make sure you don't use the email support address, nothing but a summer-intern call-center with a generic troubleshooting list; as in, "Is the power cable plugged into the wall outlet?" or "Do you have to go to the bathroom?" Edited August 28, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+TrailGators Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 Beware of strangers bearing gifts ... What's wrong with this picture? - or - Cox ... your friend in the digital age. Can you say "DOCSIS 3.0?" It's coming your way. Crap! That's going to kill streaming movies from Netflix. My speed is still OK for the time being... No lie ... streaming videos would run only six seconds before reloading for ten seconds, on and on.. Story goes like this ... one day a UPS carton showed up at my front door. Inside was a Motorola SB5101 cable modem and a letter. Said ""Your existing modem will be incompatible with our service on August 31st ." Provided was a replacement modem, no charge. Installed it and lost 72% of my download and upload speed, totally unworkable. Turned out that the modem sent to me was second-hand and already had an assigned MAC address. Down where I come from we've got a name for goods like that. Time passed, ... time passed, ... second carton arrived at my front door today. Result as follows. Now I'm steamed because Trailgators one-upped my download speed. Thanks a lot fella, I was going to feel better. Maybe you pay extra for more speed? Underlying issue is that Cox is heading toward DOCSIS 3.0 so all old DOCSIS 1.0 modems have to go bye-bye. If any of you encounter this then make sure to call the Cox technical guys at 1-888-556-1193 so that they can verify and validate the HFC MAC address that's on the nameplate under the modem. Make sure you don't use the email support address, nothing but a summer-intern call-center with a generic troubleshooting list; as in, "Is the power cable plugged into the wall outlet?" or "Do you have to go to the bathroom?" Nope, I don't pay extra. If I did the premium service would supposedly give me 30M down, but that's peak and they guarantee nada. There are some nights that the speed drastically drops for no apparent reason and I have to call them. I agree about the poor support but they must be an equal opportunity employer because they obviously hire the people that put the round peg in the square hole. Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 (edited) Beware of strangers bearing gifts ... What's wrong with this picture? - or - Cox ... your friend in the digital age. Can you say "DOCSIS 3.0?" It's coming your way. Crap! That's going to kill streaming movies from Netflix. My speed is still OK for the time being... No lie ... streaming videos would run only six seconds before reloading for ten seconds, on and on.. Story goes like this ... one day a UPS carton showed up at my front door. Inside was a Motorola SB5101 cable modem and a letter. Said ""Your existing modem will be incompatible with our service on August 31st ." Provided was a replacement modem, no charge. Installed it and lost 72% of my download and upload speed, totally unworkable. Turned out that the modem sent to me was second-hand and already had an assigned MAC address. Down where I come from we've got a name for goods like that. Time passed, ... time passed, ... second carton arrived at my front door today. Result as follows. Now I'm steamed because Trailgators one-upped my download speed. Thanks a lot fella, I was going to feel better. Maybe you pay extra for more speed? Underlying issue is that Cox is heading toward DOCSIS 3.0 so all old DOCSIS 1.0 modems have to go bye-bye. If any of you encounter this then make sure to call the Cox technical guys at 1-888-556-1193 so that they can verify and validate the HFC MAC address that's on the nameplate under the modem. Make sure you don't use the email support address, nothing but a summer-intern call-center with a generic troubleshooting list; as in, "Is the power cable plugged into the wall outlet?" or "Do you have to go to the bathroom?" Nope, I don't pay extra. If I did the premium service would supposedly give me 30M down, but that's peak and they guarantee nada. There are some nights that the speed drastically drops for no apparent reason and I have to call them. I agree about the poor support but they must be an equal opportunity employer because they obviously hire the people that put the round peg in the square hole. O so now I get it, they follow an I-5 versus Highway 67 philosophy. Goes like this "If y'all are east-county then y'all surely don't need no download speed. B'sides, Harmon honey, y'all is just a bunch o' behin' th' times senior citizens waitin' on th' call t' come home, it's supper time." Why I oughta .... Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? http://www.speedtest.net/ While I had the 0.806 Mb/s thang goin' on I decided to download a trial version of Adobe Photoshop Elements 8.0 so's I could properly answer a question from FisnJack; guess what, over four-hour download. It was dialup dejà vu all over again. Back when I was a boy bits hadn't been invented yet. It was a better life without bits, you know, more or less. Note to Self: Pat puts up his peak against my average ... rascal. Edited August 28, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+TrailGators Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 Beware of strangers bearing gifts ... What's wrong with this picture? - or - Cox ... your friend in the digital age. Can you say "DOCSIS 3.0?" It's coming your way. Crap! That's going to kill streaming movies from Netflix. My speed is still OK for the time being... No lie ... streaming videos would run only six seconds before reloading for ten seconds, on and on.. Story goes like this ... one day a UPS carton showed up at my front door. Inside was a Motorola SB5101 cable modem and a letter. Said ""Your existing modem will be incompatible with our service on August 31st ." Provided was a replacement modem, no charge. Installed it and lost 72% of my download and upload speed, totally unworkable. Turned out that the modem sent to me was second-hand and already had an assigned MAC address. Down where I come from we've got a name for goods like that. Time passed, ... time passed, ... second carton arrived at my front door today. Result as follows. Now I'm steamed because Trailgators one-upped my download speed. Thanks a lot fella, I was going to feel better. Maybe you pay extra for more speed? Underlying issue is that Cox is heading toward DOCSIS 3.0 so all old DOCSIS 1.0 modems have to go bye-bye. If any of you encounter this then make sure to call the Cox technical guys at 1-888-556-1193 so that they can verify and validate the HFC MAC address that's on the nameplate under the modem. Make sure you don't use the email support address, nothing but a summer-intern call-center with a generic troubleshooting list; as in, "Is the power cable plugged into the wall outlet?" or "Do you have to go to the bathroom?" Nope, I don't pay extra. If I did the premium service would supposedly give me 30M down, but that's peak and they guarantee nada. There are some nights that the speed drastically drops for no apparent reason and I have to call them. I agree about the poor support but they must be an equal opportunity employer because they obviously hire the people that put the round peg in the square hole. O so now I get it, they follow an I-5 versus Highway 67 philosophy. Goes like this "If y'all are east-county then y'all surely don't need no download speed. B'sides, Harmon honey, y'all is just a bunch o' behin' th' times senior citizens waitin' on th' call t' come home, it's supper time." Why I oughta .... Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? http://www.speedtest.net/ While I had the 0.806 Mb/s thang goin' on I decided to download a trial version of Adobe Photoshop ELements 8.0 so's I could properly answer a question from FisnJack; guess what, over four-hour download. It was dialup dejà vu all over again. Back when I was a boy bits hadn't been invented yet. It was a better life without bits, you know, more or less. Note to Self: Pat puts up his peak against my average ... rascal. Harmon, I live off the 15. You know what they say "Some like it hot!" If I were you I would complain or least least tell Cox you should pay the fee for what you are actually getting. The basic Cox plan is 1.5M down, the normal one is 15M down and the premium one is 30M down. Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 (edited) Beware of strangers bearing gifts ... What's wrong with this picture? - or - Cox ... your friend in the digital age. Can you say "DOCSIS 3.0?" It's coming your way. Crap! That's going to kill streaming movies from Netflix. My speed is still OK for the time being... No lie ... streaming videos would run only six seconds before reloading for ten seconds, on and on.. Story goes like this ... one day a UPS carton showed up at my front door. Inside was a Motorola SB5101 cable modem and a letter. Said ""Your existing modem will be incompatible with our service on August 31st ." Provided was a replacement modem, no charge. Installed it and lost 72% of my download and upload speed, totally unworkable. Turned out that the modem sent to me was second-hand and already had an assigned MAC address. Down where I come from we've got a name for goods like that. Time passed, ... time passed, ... second carton arrived at my front door today. Result as follows. Now I'm steamed because Trailgators one-upped my download speed. Thanks a lot fella, I was going to feel better. Maybe you pay extra for more speed? Underlying issue is that Cox is heading toward DOCSIS 3.0 so all old DOCSIS 1.0 modems have to go bye-bye. If any of you encounter this then make sure to call the Cox technical guys at 1-888-556-1193 so that they can verify and validate the HFC MAC address that's on the nameplate under the modem. Make sure you don't use the email support address, nothing but a summer-intern call-center with a generic troubleshooting list; as in, "Is the power cable plugged into the wall outlet?" or "Do you have to go to the bathroom?" Nope, I don't pay extra. If I did the premium service would supposedly give me 30M down, but that's peak and they guarantee nada. There are some nights that the speed drastically drops for no apparent reason and I have to call them. I agree about the poor support but they must be an equal opportunity employer because they obviously hire the people that put the round peg in the square hole. O so now I get it, they follow an I-5 versus Highway 67 philosophy. Goes like this "If y'all are east-county then y'all surely don't need no download speed. B'sides, Harmon honey, y'all is just a bunch o' behin' th' times senior citizens waitin' on th' call t' come home, it's supper time." Why I oughta .... Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? http://www.speedtest.net/ While I had the 0.806 Mb/s thang goin' on I decided to download a trial version of Adobe Photoshop ELements 8.0 so's I could properly answer a question from FisnJack; guess what, over four-hour download. It was dialup dejà vu all over again. Back when I was a boy bits hadn't been invented yet. It was a better life without bits, you know, more or less. Note to Self: Pat puts up his peak against my average ... rascal. Harmon, I live off the 15. You know what they say "Some like it hot!" If I were you I would complain or least least tell Cox you should pay the fee for what you are actually getting. The basic Cox plan is 1.5M down, the normal one is 15M down and the premium one is 30M down. Yeah well, I asked three times now for them to reimburse me for the two months of bad service while trying to get them to resolve the modem issue. No response from them whatsoever. Maybe English is just their second or third language. Of all my carefully composed problem statments sent to them, not once did I receive a reply that gave me the slightest assurance that somebody read my messages; much less understood them. I'm bundling a package of my unanswered emails and sending the bundle to the Cox mojo-man. Maybe his staff will let a few of my remarks leak-through to their boss ... should give him a few laughs during cocktails. Edited August 28, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+TrailGators Posted August 29, 2010 Posted August 29, 2010 Beware of strangers bearing gifts ... What's wrong with this picture? - or - Cox ... your friend in the digital age. Can you say "DOCSIS 3.0?" It's coming your way. Crap! That's going to kill streaming movies from Netflix. My speed is still OK for the time being... No lie ... streaming videos would run only six seconds before reloading for ten seconds, on and on.. Story goes like this ... one day a UPS carton showed up at my front door. Inside was a Motorola SB5101 cable modem and a letter. Said ""Your existing modem will be incompatible with our service on August 31st ." Provided was a replacement modem, no charge. Installed it and lost 72% of my download and upload speed, totally unworkable. Turned out that the modem sent to me was second-hand and already had an assigned MAC address. Down where I come from we've got a name for goods like that. Time passed, ... time passed, ... second carton arrived at my front door today. Result as follows. Now I'm steamed because Trailgators one-upped my download speed. Thanks a lot fella, I was going to feel better. Maybe you pay extra for more speed? Underlying issue is that Cox is heading toward DOCSIS 3.0 so all old DOCSIS 1.0 modems have to go bye-bye. If any of you encounter this then make sure to call the Cox technical guys at 1-888-556-1193 so that they can verify and validate the HFC MAC address that's on the nameplate under the modem. Make sure you don't use the email support address, nothing but a summer-intern call-center with a generic troubleshooting list; as in, "Is the power cable plugged into the wall outlet?" or "Do you have to go to the bathroom?" Nope, I don't pay extra. If I did the premium service would supposedly give me 30M down, but that's peak and they guarantee nada. There are some nights that the speed drastically drops for no apparent reason and I have to call them. I agree about the poor support but they must be an equal opportunity employer because they obviously hire the people that put the round peg in the square hole. O so now I get it, they follow an I-5 versus Highway 67 philosophy. Goes like this "If y'all are east-county then y'all surely don't need no download speed. B'sides, Harmon honey, y'all is just a bunch o' behin' th' times senior citizens waitin' on th' call t' come home, it's supper time." Why I oughta .... Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? http://www.speedtest.net/ While I had the 0.806 Mb/s thang goin' on I decided to download a trial version of Adobe Photoshop ELements 8.0 so's I could properly answer a question from FisnJack; guess what, over four-hour download. It was dialup dejà vu all over again. Back when I was a boy bits hadn't been invented yet. It was a better life without bits, you know, more or less. Note to Self: Pat puts up his peak against my average ... rascal. Harmon, I live off the 15. You know what they say "Some like it hot!" If I were you I would complain or least least tell Cox you should pay the fee for what you are actually getting. The basic Cox plan is 1.5M down, the normal one is 15M down and the premium one is 30M down. Yeah well, I asked three times now for them to reimburse me for the two months of bad service while trying to get them to resolve the modem issue. No response from them whatsoever. Maybe English is just their second or third language. Of all my carefully composed problem statments sent to them, not once did I receive a reply that gave me the slightest assurance that somebody read my messages; much less understood them. I'm bundling a package of my unanswered emails and sending the bundle to the Cox mojo-man. Maybe his staff will let a few of my remarks leak-through to their boss ... should give him a few laughs during cocktails. Sounds like Cox. Funny how the company name makes me think of something else when they give me the same runaround... Quote
+jahoadi and john Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 If Only I could make camo this good! Quote
+Cat & Bobby Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? Harmon: Ours seems to be OK, but then we are closer to I-5 than you are (Lemon Grove) Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 (edited) If Only I could make camo this good! Mulch, ... you need more mulch. Lemme see, seems like I have a photo of mulch around here somewhere. If I find it I'll post it. Edited September 3, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 (edited) Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? Harmon: Ours seems to be OK, but then we are closer to I-5 than you are (Lemon Grove) Hey, thanks for sharing. Also received results from FisnJack by way of email. Here's my improved result. Gives me a chance to do a wrapup on my situation which, as you can see above, is much improved. At one point during my bout with Cox over the cable modems I took my laptop and the first modem out onto my driveway and connected directly to the streetside cable so's to definitely counter any argument about splitters, household cable, Ethernet wiring, and router. That confirmed the same 0.84 download and 0.29 upload speed. Once the second cable modem arrived and was installed, same poor result. Called Cox once again and went through the same elimination process with the surprising result that my Linksys router was faulty. My bad not rechecking that possibility once I had the second cable modem installed. As you can see from my post above I'm back in business as expected. There are three levels offered by Cox ... Essential at 1.5 Mb/s download, Preferred at 15 Mb/s, and Premier at 30 Mb/s. With cable modem and router problems behind me speed tests range between 14 and 19 Mb/s as expected. Back to being a happy-camper for Internet access ... for all those high resolution photos and videos in my life of Photoshop usage and tutoring. Nothing like beariing down on a problem that took over two months to resolve. What really spoiled me was working at Sandy Creek Ranch where we had a T-1 line and a 30-mile line-of-sight wireless access point. The heart of the cable-modem swapout is that if your cable modem is only good for DOCSIS 1.0 then it will have to be swapped out as Cox embraces DOCSIS 3.0. This problem first came up with the increased type and number of DTCMMBLB images I've had to handle. ... putting some strain on my broad band service if y' know what I mean. Edited September 3, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+fisnjack Posted September 4, 2010 Posted September 4, 2010 (edited) junk Edited September 4, 2010 by fisnjack Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 4, 2010 Posted September 4, 2010 Junk FisnJack is learning to post images on Forum threads. So far my instructions haven't paid off for him but he's real close. Might be a case of too much information. Worst case I'll drive down to his place and spank him until he's got it figured out. Harmon Quote
+Let's Look Over Thayer Posted September 5, 2010 Posted September 5, 2010 JunkFisnJack is learning to post images on Forum threads. So far my instructions haven't paid off for him but he's real close. Might be a case of too much information. Worst case I'll drive down to his place and spank him until he's got it figured out. A spanking, a spanking, there's going to be a spanking tonight!!!!! ...and after the spanking.... the Oral Sex!! Or maybe not... Quote
+jahoadi and john Posted September 5, 2010 Posted September 5, 2010 Honk if you know where this is... Quote
+Team Fatman Posted September 5, 2010 Posted September 5, 2010 Honk if you know where this is... BEEP BEEP had a blast today thanks for making it a fun day. Those are some nice looking rigs Quote
+fisnjack Posted September 5, 2010 Posted September 5, 2010 Well here goes another try. The other day while driving Dilleed and Rammjet around the OTT we spotted 2 deer. I wasn't able to get the pics through the windshield, however; they stopped to allow Dillweed to do it. Quote
+SKILLET Posted September 5, 2010 Posted September 5, 2010 OH what a Feeling to be riding in a Toyota Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 5, 2010 Posted September 5, 2010 Well here goes another try. The other day while driving Dilleed and Rammjet around the OTT we spotted 2 deer. I wasn't able to get the pics through the windshield, however; they stopped to allow Dillweed to do it. Hey everybody ... FisnJack got'erdone posting photos to the Forum. Congratulations ... now I can clean out my email stack. He's all set now .... another Photoshop trainee that can help me pester some of th' local Geochicks. Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 5, 2010 Posted September 5, 2010 OH what a Feeling to be riding in a Toyota So I'm wonderin' ... how're th' floormats in those two Toyotas? Quote
+Team Fatman Posted September 5, 2010 Posted September 5, 2010 OH what a Feeling to be riding in a Toyota So I'm wonderin' ... how're th' floormats in those two Toyotas? You will have to ride in GEO YODA to get that answer. Quote
+jahoadi and john Posted September 5, 2010 Posted September 5, 2010 OH what a Feeling to be riding in a Toyota So I'm wonderin' ... how're th' floormats in those two Toyotas? our floormats are fine..the floor boards on the passeneger side are worn out though from me applying the brakes...darn John! Quote
+Let's Look Over Thayer Posted September 5, 2010 Posted September 5, 2010 our floormats are fine..the floor boards on the passeneger side are worn out though from me applying the brakes...darn John! I tend to agree. I rode in the FJ this morning up the Pine Creek road (with John driving) and had the opportunity to test those floorboards for myself... Quote
+FlagMan Posted September 6, 2010 Posted September 6, 2010 our floormats are fine..the floor boards on the passeneger side are worn out though from me applying the brakes...darn John! I tend to agree. I rode in the FJ this morning up the Pine Creek road (with John driving) and had the opportunity to test those floorboards for myself... Uhhhhh... So there's brakes on that rig?!?! Quote
+TrailGators Posted September 6, 2010 Posted September 6, 2010 Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? Harmon: Ours seems to be OK, but then we are closer to I-5 than you are (Lemon Grove) Hey, thanks for sharing. Also received results from FisnJack by way of email. Here's my improved result. Gives me a chance to do a wrapup on my situation which, as you can see above, is much improved. At one point during my bout with Cox over the cable modems I took my laptop and the first modem out onto my driveway and connected directly to the streetside cable so's to definitely counter any argument about splitters, household cable, Ethernet wiring, and router. That confirmed the same 0.84 download and 0.29 upload speed. Once the second cable modem arrived and was installed, same poor result. Called Cox once again and went through the same elimination process with the surprising result that my Linksys router was faulty. My bad not rechecking that possibility once I had the second cable modem installed. As you can see from my post above I'm back in business as expected. There are three levels offered by Cox ... Essential at 1.5 Mb/s download, Preferred at 15 Mb/s, and Premier at 30 Mb/s. With cable modem and router problems behind me speed tests range between 14 and 19 Mb/s as expected. Back to being a happy-camper for Internet access ... for all those high resolution photos and videos in my life of Photoshop usage and tutoring. Nothing like beariing down on a problem that took over two months to resolve. What really spoiled me was working at Sandy Creek Ranch where we had a T-1 line and a 30-mile line-of-sight wireless access point. The heart of the cable-modem swapout is that if your cable modem is only good for DOCSIS 1.0 then it will have to be swapped out as Cox embraces DOCSIS 3.0. This problem first came up with the increased type and number of DTCMMBLB images I've had to handle. ... putting some strain on my broad band service if y' know what I mean. Harmon, my neighbor is an engineer at Motorola and he just gave me a Motorola SBG6580 DOCSIS 3.0, Wireless-N WPS Modem/Router to try out. Sweet! Here are my updated speed test results: Best Buy sells the SBG6580 for about $150. Wireless-N is nice because that gives me 300M on my local network for DLNA streaming. Now that I have Wireless-N, I might get one of these. Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 6, 2010 Posted September 6, 2010 (edited) Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? Harmon: Ours seems to be OK, but then we are closer to I-5 than you are (Lemon Grove) Hey, thanks for sharing. Also received results from FisnJack by way of email. Here's my improved result. Gives me a chance to do a wrapup on my situation which, as you can see above, is much improved. At one point during my bout with Cox over the cable modems I took my laptop and the first modem out onto my driveway and connected directly to the streetside cable so's to definitely counter any argument about splitters, household cable, Ethernet wiring, and router. That confirmed the same 0.84 download and 0.29 upload speed. Once the second cable modem arrived and was installed, same poor result. Called Cox once again and went through the same elimination process with the surprising result that my Linksys router was faulty. My bad not rechecking that possibility once I had the second cable modem installed. As you can see from my post above I'm back in business as expected. There are three levels offered by Cox ... Essential at 1.5 Mb/s download, Preferred at 15 Mb/s, and Premier at 30 Mb/s. With cable modem and router problems behind me speed tests range between 14 and 19 Mb/s as expected. Back to being a happy-camper for Internet access ... for all those high resolution photos and videos in my life of Photoshop usage and tutoring. Nothing like beariing down on a problem that took over two months to resolve. What really spoiled me was working at Sandy Creek Ranch where we had a T-1 line and a 30-mile line-of-sight wireless access point. The heart of the cable-modem swapout is that if your cable modem is only good for DOCSIS 1.0 then it will have to be swapped out as Cox embraces DOCSIS 3.0. This problem first came up with the increased type and number of DTCMMBLB images I've had to handle. ... putting some strain on my broad band service if y' know what I mean. Harmon, my neighbor is an engineer at Motorola and he just gave me a Motorola SBG6580 DOCSIS 3.0, Wireless-N WPS Modem/Router to try out. Sweet! Here are my updated speed test results: Best Buy sells the SBG6580 for about $150. Wireless-N is nice because that gives me 300M on my local network for DLNA streaming. Now that I have Wireless-N, I might get one of these. Pat, Don't return it! No, wait, tell him you lost it and then ask him to loan you another one so's I can have one too. Guess I'll have to Photoshop my SpeedTest report to get ahead of you. What router are you using? Sure feels better now that those problems are behind me. As it was watching six seconds of streaming video followed by ten seconds of a spinner, over and over again, wasn't a lot of fun. Made it too miserable to watch the Adobe tutorials when Photoshop CS5 was released. During off-hours I'm seeing up to low twenties and then down between 14 Mb/s and 19 Mb/s during peak hours. I can live with that but now I'm encouraged to consider buying an SBG6580. Amazon offers it at $99.95 with free shipping. Thanks pal, Harmon Edited September 6, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+TrailGators Posted September 7, 2010 Posted September 7, 2010 Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? Harmon: Ours seems to be OK, but then we are closer to I-5 than you are (Lemon Grove) Hey, thanks for sharing. Also received results from FisnJack by way of email. Here's my improved result. Gives me a chance to do a wrapup on my situation which, as you can see above, is much improved. At one point during my bout with Cox over the cable modems I took my laptop and the first modem out onto my driveway and connected directly to the streetside cable so's to definitely counter any argument about splitters, household cable, Ethernet wiring, and router. That confirmed the same 0.84 download and 0.29 upload speed. Once the second cable modem arrived and was installed, same poor result. Called Cox once again and went through the same elimination process with the surprising result that my Linksys router was faulty. My bad not rechecking that possibility once I had the second cable modem installed. As you can see from my post above I'm back in business as expected. There are three levels offered by Cox ... Essential at 1.5 Mb/s download, Preferred at 15 Mb/s, and Premier at 30 Mb/s. With cable modem and router problems behind me speed tests range between 14 and 19 Mb/s as expected. Back to being a happy-camper for Internet access ... for all those high resolution photos and videos in my life of Photoshop usage and tutoring. Nothing like beariing down on a problem that took over two months to resolve. What really spoiled me was working at Sandy Creek Ranch where we had a T-1 line and a 30-mile line-of-sight wireless access point. The heart of the cable-modem swapout is that if your cable modem is only good for DOCSIS 1.0 then it will have to be swapped out as Cox embraces DOCSIS 3.0. This problem first came up with the increased type and number of DTCMMBLB images I've had to handle. ... putting some strain on my broad band service if y' know what I mean. Harmon, my neighbor is an engineer at Motorola and he just gave me a Motorola SBG6580 DOCSIS 3.0, Wireless-N WPS Modem/Router to try out. Sweet! Here are my updated speed test results: Best Buy sells the SBG6580 for about $150. Wireless-N is nice because that gives me 300M on my local network for DLNA streaming. Now that I have Wireless-N, I might get one of these. Pat, Don't return it! No, wait, tell him you lost it and then ask him to loan you another one so's I can have one too. Guess I'll have to Photoshop my SpeedTest report to get ahead of you. What router are you using? Sure feels better now that those problems are behind me. As it was watching six seconds of streaming video followed by ten seconds of a spinner, over and over again, wasn't a lot of fun. Made it too miserable to watch the Adobe tutorials when Photoshop CS5 was released. During off-hours I'm seeing up to low twenties and then down between 14 Mb/s and 19 Mb/s during peak hours. I can live with that but now I'm encouraged to consider buying an SBG6580. Amazon offers it at $99.95 with free shipping. Thanks pal, Harmon My speed varies too. The SBG6580 is a cable modem and a wireless (G&N) 4-port router all in one. It's been working great so far, but if I ever have troubles I have engineering support for it right across the street. Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 7, 2010 Posted September 7, 2010 Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? Harmon: Ours seems to be OK, but then we are closer to I-5 than you are (Lemon Grove) Hey, thanks for sharing. Also received results from FisnJack by way of email. Here's my improved result. Gives me a chance to do a wrapup on my situation which, as you can see above, is much improved. At one point during my bout with Cox over the cable modems I took my laptop and the first modem out onto my driveway and connected directly to the streetside cable so's to definitely counter any argument about splitters, household cable, Ethernet wiring, and router. That confirmed the same 0.84 download and 0.29 upload speed. Once the second cable modem arrived and was installed, same poor result. Called Cox once again and went through the same elimination process with the surprising result that my Linksys router was faulty. My bad not rechecking that possibility once I had the second cable modem installed. As you can see from my post above I'm back in business as expected. There are three levels offered by Cox ... Essential at 1.5 Mb/s download, Preferred at 15 Mb/s, and Premier at 30 Mb/s. With cable modem and router problems behind me speed tests range between 14 and 19 Mb/s as expected. Back to being a happy-camper for Internet access ... for all those high resolution photos and videos in my life of Photoshop usage and tutoring. Nothing like beariing down on a problem that took over two months to resolve. What really spoiled me was working at Sandy Creek Ranch where we had a T-1 line and a 30-mile line-of-sight wireless access point. The heart of the cable-modem swapout is that if your cable modem is only good for DOCSIS 1.0 then it will have to be swapped out as Cox embraces DOCSIS 3.0. This problem first came up with the increased type and number of DTCMMBLB images I've had to handle. ... putting some strain on my broad band service if y' know what I mean. Harmon, my neighbor is an engineer at Motorola and he just gave me a Motorola SBG6580 DOCSIS 3.0, Wireless-N WPS Modem/Router to try out. Sweet! Here are my updated speed test results: Best Buy sells the SBG6580 for about $150. Wireless-N is nice because that gives me 300M on my local network for DLNA streaming. Now that I have Wireless-N, I might get one of these. Pat, Don't return it! No, wait, tell him you lost it and then ask him to loan you another one so's I can have one too. Guess I'll have to Photoshop my SpeedTest report to get ahead of you. What router are you using? Sure feels better now that those problems are behind me. As it was watching six seconds of streaming video followed by ten seconds of a spinner, over and over again, wasn't a lot of fun. Made it too miserable to watch the Adobe tutorials when Photoshop CS5 was released. During off-hours I'm seeing up to low twenties and then down between 14 Mb/s and 19 Mb/s during peak hours. I can live with that but now I'm encouraged to consider buying an SBG6580. Amazon offers it at $99.95 with free shipping. Thanks pal, Harmon My speed varies too. The SBG6580 is a cable modem and a wireless (G&N) 4-port router all in one. It's been working great so far, but if I ever have troubles I have engineering support for it right across the street. My speed never varies if you mean while out Geocaching on local trails. Anyway, that sounds like a great box ... even one less power converter and at least one less Ethernet cable too. Let me know when he brings another one for me. I'll drive over to get it from you so's you don't have t' make th' trip. Like I always said, you're a swell guy. Harmon Quote
+jahoadi and john Posted September 7, 2010 Posted September 7, 2010 Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? Harmon: Ours seems to be OK, but then we are closer to I-5 than you are (Lemon Grove) Hey, thanks for sharing. Also received results from FisnJack by way of email. Here's my improved result. Gives me a chance to do a wrapup on my situation which, as you can see above, is much improved. At one point during my bout with Cox over the cable modems I took my laptop and the first modem out onto my driveway and connected directly to the streetside cable so's to definitely counter any argument about splitters, household cable, Ethernet wiring, and router. That confirmed the same 0.84 download and 0.29 upload speed. Once the second cable modem arrived and was installed, same poor result. Called Cox once again and went through the same elimination process with the surprising result that my Linksys router was faulty. My bad not rechecking that possibility once I had the second cable modem installed. As you can see from my post above I'm back in business as expected. There are three levels offered by Cox ... Essential at 1.5 Mb/s download, Preferred at 15 Mb/s, and Premier at 30 Mb/s. With cable modem and router problems behind me speed tests range between 14 and 19 Mb/s as expected. Back to being a happy-camper for Internet access ... for all those high resolution photos and videos in my life of Photoshop usage and tutoring. Nothing like beariing down on a problem that took over two months to resolve. What really spoiled me was working at Sandy Creek Ranch where we had a T-1 line and a 30-mile line-of-sight wireless access point. The heart of the cable-modem swapout is that if your cable modem is only good for DOCSIS 1.0 then it will have to be swapped out as Cox embraces DOCSIS 3.0. This problem first came up with the increased type and number of DTCMMBLB images I've had to handle. ... putting some strain on my broad band service if y' know what I mean. Harmon, my neighbor is an engineer at Motorola and he just gave me a Motorola SBG6580 DOCSIS 3.0, Wireless-N WPS Modem/Router to try out. Sweet! Here are my updated speed test results: Best Buy sells the SBG6580 for about $150. Wireless-N is nice because that gives me 300M on my local network for DLNA streaming. Now that I have Wireless-N, I might get one of these. Pat, Don't return it! No, wait, tell him you lost it and then ask him to loan you another one so's I can have one too. Guess I'll have to Photoshop my SpeedTest report to get ahead of you. What router are you using? Sure feels better now that those problems are behind me. As it was watching six seconds of streaming video followed by ten seconds of a spinner, over and over again, wasn't a lot of fun. Made it too miserable to watch the Adobe tutorials when Photoshop CS5 was released. During off-hours I'm seeing up to low twenties and then down between 14 Mb/s and 19 Mb/s during peak hours. I can live with that but now I'm encouraged to consider buying an SBG6580. Amazon offers it at $99.95 with free shipping. Thanks pal, Harmon My speed varies too. The SBG6580 is a cable modem and a wireless (G&N) 4-port router all in one. It's been working great so far, but if I ever have troubles I have engineering support for it right across the street. My speed never varies if you mean while out Geocaching on local trails. Anyway, that sounds like a great box ... even one less power converter and at least one less Ethernet cable too. Let me know when he brings another one for me. I'll drive over to get it from you so's you don't have t' make th' trip. Like I always said, you're a swell guy. Harmon You guys make me sick...try living out in the Boonies where we just got rid of AOL dial-up. We can't even watch UTube videos because they keep pausing to load .... Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 7, 2010 Posted September 7, 2010 (edited) Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? Harmon: Ours seems to be OK, but then we are closer to I-5 than you are (Lemon Grove) Hey, thanks for sharing. Also received results from FisnJack by way of email. Here's my improved result. Gives me a chance to do a wrapup on my situation which, as you can see above, is much improved. At one point during my bout with Cox over the cable modems I took my laptop and the first modem out onto my driveway and connected directly to the streetside cable so's to definitely counter any argument about splitters, household cable, Ethernet wiring, and router. That confirmed the same 0.84 download and 0.29 upload speed. Once the second cable modem arrived and was installed, same poor result. Called Cox once again and went through the same elimination process with the surprising result that my Linksys router was faulty. My bad not rechecking that possibility once I had the second cable modem installed. As you can see from my post above I'm back in business as expected. There are three levels offered by Cox ... Essential at 1.5 Mb/s download, Preferred at 15 Mb/s, and Premier at 30 Mb/s. With cable modem and router problems behind me speed tests range between 14 and 19 Mb/s as expected. Back to being a happy-camper for Internet access ... for all those high resolution photos and videos in my life of Photoshop usage and tutoring. Nothing like beariing down on a problem that took over two months to resolve. What really spoiled me was working at Sandy Creek Ranch where we had a T-1 line and a 30-mile line-of-sight wireless access point. The heart of the cable-modem swapout is that if your cable modem is only good for DOCSIS 1.0 then it will have to be swapped out as Cox embraces DOCSIS 3.0. This problem first came up with the increased type and number of DTCMMBLB images I've had to handle. ... putting some strain on my broad band service if y' know what I mean. Harmon, my neighbor is an engineer at Motorola and he just gave me a Motorola SBG6580 DOCSIS 3.0, Wireless-N WPS Modem/Router to try out. Sweet! Here are my updated speed test results: Best Buy sells the SBG6580 for about $150. Wireless-N is nice because that gives me 300M on my local network for DLNA streaming. Now that I have Wireless-N, I might get one of these. Pat, Don't return it! No, wait, tell him you lost it and then ask him to loan you another one so's I can have one too. Guess I'll have to Photoshop my SpeedTest report to get ahead of you. What router are you using? Sure feels better now that those problems are behind me. As it was watching six seconds of streaming video followed by ten seconds of a spinner, over and over again, wasn't a lot of fun. Made it too miserable to watch the Adobe tutorials when Photoshop CS5 was released. During off-hours I'm seeing up to low twenties and then down between 14 Mb/s and 19 Mb/s during peak hours. I can live with that but now I'm encouraged to consider buying an SBG6580. Amazon offers it at $99.95 with free shipping. Thanks pal, Harmon My speed varies too. The SBG6580 is a cable modem and a wireless (G&N) 4-port router all in one. It's been working great so far, but if I ever have troubles I have engineering support for it right across the street. My speed never varies if you mean while out Geocaching on local trails. Anyway, that sounds like a great box ... even one less power converter and at least one less Ethernet cable too. Let me know when he brings another one for me. I'll drive over to get it from you so's you don't have t' make th' trip. Like I always said, you're a swell guy. Harmon You guys make me sick...try living out in the Boonies where we just got rid of AOL dial-up. We can't even watch UTube videos because they keep pausing to load .... Jodi, Good gosh girl, I had no idea. Seriously, you've been using AOL dialup to achieve your find-count? Do you have electricity and indoor plumbing out there in the sticks? Who do you know that has Cox cable service and lives where you can see their house from your place? ... o yeah, only thang you can see from your place is the old steel bridge, huh? Come on Jodi, run a speed test and post th' results. Make us feel good sweet thang. O well, Sweet ol' Harmon Edited September 7, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+TXHooligans Posted September 7, 2010 Posted September 7, 2010 i bet it took a couple of hours for the same pic to load over and over too.. Quote
+jahoadi and john Posted September 7, 2010 Posted September 7, 2010 Hmm, would be fun if other county Geocachers would run a network speedtest and post results and mention their general area of the county. Maybe not, it'll just make me feel worse won't it? Harmon: Ours seems to be OK, but then we are closer to I-5 than you are (Lemon Grove) Hey, thanks for sharing. Also received results from FisnJack by way of email. Here's my improved result. Gives me a chance to do a wrapup on my situation which, as you can see above, is much improved. At one point during my bout with Cox over the cable modems I took my laptop and the first modem out onto my driveway and connected directly to the streetside cable so's to definitely counter any argument about splitters, household cable, Ethernet wiring, and router. That confirmed the same 0.84 download and 0.29 upload speed. Once the second cable modem arrived and was installed, same poor result. Called Cox once again and went through the same elimination process with the surprising result that my Linksys router was faulty. My bad not rechecking that possibility once I had the second cable modem installed. As you can see from my post above I'm back in business as expected. There are three levels offered by Cox ... Essential at 1.5 Mb/s download, Preferred at 15 Mb/s, and Premier at 30 Mb/s. With cable modem and router problems behind me speed tests range between 14 and 19 Mb/s as expected. Back to being a happy-camper for Internet access ... for all those high resolution photos and videos in my life of Photoshop usage and tutoring. Nothing like beariing down on a problem that took over two months to resolve. What really spoiled me was working at Sandy Creek Ranch where we had a T-1 line and a 30-mile line-of-sight wireless access point. The heart of the cable-modem swapout is that if your cable modem is only good for DOCSIS 1.0 then it will have to be swapped out as Cox embraces DOCSIS 3.0. This problem first came up with the increased type and number of DTCMMBLB images I've had to handle. ... putting some strain on my broad band service if y' know what I mean. Harmon, my neighbor is an engineer at Motorola and he just gave me a Motorola SBG6580 DOCSIS 3.0, Wireless-N WPS Modem/Router to try out. Sweet! Here are my updated speed test results: Best Buy sells the SBG6580 for about $150. Wireless-N is nice because that gives me 300M on my local network for DLNA streaming. Now that I have Wireless-N, I might get one of these. Pat, Don't return it! No, wait, tell him you lost it and then ask him to loan you another one so's I can have one too. Guess I'll have to Photoshop my SpeedTest report to get ahead of you. What router are you using? Sure feels better now that those problems are behind me. As it was watching six seconds of streaming video followed by ten seconds of a spinner, over and over again, wasn't a lot of fun. Made it too miserable to watch the Adobe tutorials when Photoshop CS5 was released. During off-hours I'm seeing up to low twenties and then down between 14 Mb/s and 19 Mb/s during peak hours. I can live with that but now I'm encouraged to consider buying an SBG6580. Amazon offers it at $99.95 with free shipping. Thanks pal, Harmon My speed varies too. The SBG6580 is a cable modem and a wireless (G&N) 4-port router all in one. It's been working great so far, but if I ever have troubles I have engineering support for it right across the street. My speed never varies if you mean while out Geocaching on local trails. Anyway, that sounds like a great box ... even one less power converter and at least one less Ethernet cable too. Let me know when he brings another one for me. I'll drive over to get it from you so's you don't have t' make th' trip. Like I always said, you're a swell guy. Harmon You guys make me sick...try living out in the Boonies where we just got rid of AOL dial-up. We can't even watch UTube videos because they keep pausing to load .... Jodi, Good gosh girl, I had no idea. Seriously, you've been using AOL dialup to achieve your find-count? Do you have electricity and indoor plumbing out there in the sticks? Who do you know that has Cox cable service and lives where you can see their house from your place? ... o yeah, only thang you can see from your place is the old steel bridge, huh? Come on Jodi, run a speed test and post th' results. Make us feel good sweet thang. O well, Sweet ol' Harmon Ok.....for giggles tell me how to do a speed test......if it's not a fresh Forum page it takes about 10 minutes for all the posts to load......the critter page it a show stopper.... Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 7, 2010 Posted September 7, 2010 (edited) Ok.....for giggles tell me how to do a speed test...... if it's not a fresh Forum page it takes about 10 minutes for all the posts to load......the critter page it a show stopper.... Jodi, Great, here's the URL to run a network speed test. Speedtest.net What comes up is a map with a star-spinner. Hover your cursor near the spinner until you see a popup list, then click San Diego. That will start the speed test ... three things ... ping, download, and then upload speed test. At the end it will display a results window. Because you live out in th' sticks maybe Chula Vista is your ISP, just try both. Yeah, you and the TXHooligans are right ... all those images on our critter thread take some patience. Wow! Tyler, Texas in Smith County... all them Smiths and roses. My momma was a Smith and she married a Smith so I was born a purebred Smith. Didn't have a birth certificate so when I became eighteen I had to got to court and pay $140.00 for an official name and by then I was using my stepdad's last name. No wonder I'm always confused. Harmon Edited September 8, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+TrailGators Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Harmon, do you think Jodi is still waiting for the results from her speed test? It's been a few hours now.... Quote
+jahoadi and john Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 (edited) Harmon, do you think Jodi is still waiting for the results from her speed test? It's been a few hours now.... Pat...you are too Funny...but I don't have SNAGIT so how do I show you my results...which I don't think are good.... http://www.speedtest.net/result/944698862.png test Edited September 8, 2010 by jahoadi and john Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Harmon, do you think Jodi is still waiting for the results from her speed test? It's been a few hours now.... Yeah, I got worried too ... wondered if I should drive down there to see if th' ol' gal is o.k. Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 (edited) Harmon, do you think Jodi is still waiting for the results from her speed test? It's been a few hours now.... Pat...you are too Funny...but I don't have SNAGIT so how do I show you my results...which I don't think are good.... http://www.speedtest.net/result/944698862.png test Holy Mackerel! ... 0.66 Mb/s download speed, you call that a result? Make it seem better, call it 660 Kb/s. Honestly, I feel your pain. Here's Plan A: When you are holdin' the tin can up to your computer make sure that you keep th' strang taught; otherwise your bits will be all mushy. Mushy bits are a bad thang, technically-speaking wise. Plan B: This plan depends on you having an actual telephone line. If so use the "Check Availability" button at the link below to see if AT&T DSL Internet service is an option for you. If no phone line then maybe AT&T DSL Direct. AT&T DSL Service Plan C: Shoot girl, you live right under a mountain that has antennas sprouting from th' summit. Have John run a coax up top and patch into one of the Internet systems. Plan D: Next time John deploys pack up and go with him. Shoot, the've got decent Internet service on th' boat. Edited September 8, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+jahoadi and john Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Harmon, do you think Jodi is still waiting for the results from her speed test? It's been a few hours now.... Pat...you are too Funny...but I don't have SNAGIT so how do I show you my results...which I don't think are good.... http://www.speedtest.net/result/944698862.png test Holy Mackerel! ... 0.66 Mb/s download speed, you call that a result? Make it seem better, call it 660 Kb/s. Honestly, I feel your pain. Here's Plan A: When you are holdin' the tin can up to your computer make sure that you keep th' strang taught; otherwise your bits will be all mushy. Mushy bits are a bad thang, technically-speaking wise. Plan B: This plan depends on you having an actual telephone line. If so use the "Check Availability" button at the link below to see if AT&T DSL Internet service is an option for you. If no phone line then maybe AT&T DSL Direct. AT&T DSL Service Plan C: Shoot girl, you live right under a mountain that has antennas sprouting from th' summit. Have John run a coax up top and patch into one of the Internet systems. Plan D: Next time John deploys pack up and go with him. Shoot, the've got decent Internet service on th' boat. Harmon...Plan A and C are the only feasible ones because those results were AT&T DSL !! [:0] John's ship can't even get GC.com since they started adding so many advertisements to the pages. I tried Plan A and it works ok since I only type with one hand so I can hold the tin can with the other. Plan C has me interested: How many feet of cable do you think it would take? Trouble is the rabbits eat everything out here unless it's buried so I bet that cable wouldn't last long . Do you think we could hold an event and get some help stringing that cable? Rumor has it there's a cache at the top..or very close to it. Can you imagine what life would be like if Jodi had good internet? Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 (edited) Harmon, do you think Jodi is still waiting for the results from her speed test? It's been a few hours now.... Pat...you are too Funny...but I don't have SNAGIT so how do I show you my results...which I don't think are good.... http://www.speedtest.net/result/944698862.png test Holy Mackerel! ... 0.66 Mb/s download speed, you call that a result? Make it seem better, call it 660 Kb/s. Honestly, I feel your pain. Here's Plan A: When you are holdin' the tin can up to your computer make sure that you keep th' strang taught; otherwise your bits will be all mushy. Mushy bits are a bad thang, technically-speaking wise. Plan B: This plan depends on you having an actual telephone line. If so use the "Check Availability" button at the link below to see if AT&T DSL Internet service is an option for you. If no phone line then maybe AT&T DSL Direct. AT&T DSL Service Plan C: Shoot girl, you live right under a mountain that has antennas sprouting from th' summit. Have John run a coax up top and patch into one of the Internet systems. Plan D: Next time John deploys pack up and go with him. Shoot, the've got decent Internet service on th' boat. Harmon...Plan A and C are the only feasible ones because those results were AT&T DSL !! [:0] John's ship can't even get GC.com since they started adding so many advertisements to the pages. I tried Plan A and it works ok since I only type with one hand so I can hold the tin can with the other. Plan C has me interested: How many feet of cable do you think it would take? Trouble is the rabbits eat everything out here unless it's buried so I bet that cable wouldn't last long . Do you think we could hold an event and get some help stringing that cable? Rumor has it there's a cache at the top..or very close to it. Can you imagine what life would be like if Jodi had good internet? Jodi, my ol' heart goes out to you. I had no idea that you and John were so seriously deprived. So how in the world are you able to send me hi-res photos so often? Must have a lifetime Starbuck visitor pass. Well of course a work-party event, you know I'll be there. As far as cable-length goes ... Crow-flies is 1.75 miles so double that t' 3.5 miles for th' ups and downs; well, just th' ups and ups. Best be safe and buy a 5-mile spool 'cause you'll get a price-break on that. Make it easy on everybody and order fiber-optical cable. What with all the fiber to Cat-5 converters and such you should be able to hold th' cost down to $6,543.21. Here's th' way it will work, I'll drive up to the summit pullin' one end of the cable along behind my truck while John walks along th' cable run t' dress it up so's it follows th' contours of th' mountain. Did I mention mulch? Have John cover th' cable-run with mulch. Let me know when y' got thangs ready t' go. You're welcome, Sweet ol' Harmon Note t' Self: You cain't get good stuff like this on Facebook. Edited September 8, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+RocketMan Posted September 8, 2010 Author Posted September 8, 2010 Harmon, do you think Jodi is still waiting for the results from her speed test? It's been a few hours now.... Pat...you are too Funny...but I don't have SNAGIT so how do I show you my results...which I don't think are good.... http://www.speedtest.net/result/944698862.png test You can download a free program here that works as well, if not better than SNAGIT: http://ffextensionguru.wordpress.com/2007/...no-longer-free/ Use the link for version 5.3 which is free. Quote
+Let's Look Over Thayer Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Harmon, do you think Jodi is still waiting for the results from her speed test? It's been a few hours now.... Pat...you are too Funny...but I don't have SNAGIT so how do I show you my results...which I don't think are good.... http://www.speedtest.net/result/944698862.png test Holy Mackerel! ... 0.66 Mb/s download speed, you call that a result? Make it seem better, call it 660 Kb/s. Honestly, I feel your pain. Here's Plan A: When you are holdin' the tin can up to your computer make sure that you keep th' strang taught; otherwise your bits will be all mushy. Mushy bits are a bad thang, technically-speaking wise. Plan B: This plan depends on you having an actual telephone line. If so use the "Check Availability" button at the link below to see if AT&T DSL Internet service is an option for you. If no phone line then maybe AT&T DSL Direct. AT&T DSL Service Plan C: Shoot girl, you live right under a mountain that has antennas sprouting from th' summit. Have John run a coax up top and patch into one of the Internet systems. Plan D: Next time John deploys pack up and go with him. Shoot, the've got decent Internet service on th' boat. Harmon...Plan A and C are the only feasible ones because those results were AT&T DSL !! [:0] John's ship can't even get GC.com since they started adding so many advertisements to the pages. I tried Plan A and it works ok since I only type with one hand so I can hold the tin can with the other. Plan C has me interested: How many feet of cable do you think it would take? Trouble is the rabbits eat everything out here unless it's buried so I bet that cable wouldn't last long . Do you think we could hold an event and get some help stringing that cable? Rumor has it there's a cache at the top..or very close to it. Can you imagine what life would be like if Jodi had good internet? Plan E: IP Over Avian Carriers (IPoAC) IP are the Internet Protocols and Avian Carriers are birds (specifically Carrier Pigeons). The round-trip packet times are probably not going to be great, but the raw bandwidth of a few carrier pigeons outfitted with microSD memory cards is at least 25 times the speed DSL or 5-10 times the speed of CableModem. Data errors due to coyote might be a problem but that can be addressed by using redundant birds (those of us in the telecom industry would call it "carrier diversity"). Frankly, I'm surprised that Harmon didn't think of this... Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Harmon, do you think Jodi is still waiting for the results from her speed test? It's been a few hours now.... Pat...you are too Funny...but I don't have SNAGIT so how do I show you my results...which I don't think are good.... http://www.speedtest.net/result/944698862.png test Holy Mackerel! ... 0.66 Mb/s download speed, you call that a result? Make it seem better, call it 660 Kb/s. Honestly, I feel your pain. Here's Plan A: When you are holdin' the tin can up to your computer make sure that you keep th' strang taught; otherwise your bits will be all mushy. Mushy bits are a bad thang, technically-speaking wise. Plan B: This plan depends on you having an actual telephone line. If so use the "Check Availability" button at the link below to see if AT&T DSL Internet service is an option for you. If no phone line then maybe AT&T DSL Direct. AT&T DSL Service Plan C: Shoot girl, you live right under a mountain that has antennas sprouting from th' summit. Have John run a coax up top and patch into one of the Internet systems. Plan D: Next time John deploys pack up and go with him. Shoot, the've got decent Internet service on th' boat. Harmon...Plan A and C are the only feasible ones because those results were AT&T DSL !! [:0] John's ship can't even get GC.com since they started adding so many advertisements to the pages. I tried Plan A and it works ok since I only type with one hand so I can hold the tin can with the other. Plan C has me interested: How many feet of cable do you think it would take? Trouble is the rabbits eat everything out here unless it's buried so I bet that cable wouldn't last long . Do you think we could hold an event and get some help stringing that cable? Rumor has it there's a cache at the top..or very close to it. Can you imagine what life would be like if Jodi had good internet? Plan E: IP Over Avian Carriers (IPoAC) IP are the Internet Protocols and Avian Carriers are birds (specifically Carrier Pigeons). The round-trip packet times are probably not going to be great, but the raw bandwidth of a few carrier pigeons outfitted with microSD memory cards is at least 25 times the speed DSL or 5-10 times the speed of CableModem. Data errors due to coyote might be a problem but that can be addressed by using redundant birds (those of us in the telecom industry would call it "carrier diversity"). Frankly, I'm surprised that Harmon didn't think of this... Why I oughta .... IPoAC ... birds is birds ... ain't that what Twitter is all about? So data-rate expressed as Mb/s would be Mega Birds per second, yes? Sounds like a new spin on Cloud Computing ... how would you feel about Flock Computing? Hey Jodi, James may be onto something here. Lemme see, fifty pounds of bird seed from the feedstore and a back yard full of pigeon coops and you're good t' go. Thank goodness for small favors, now Jodi will be hanging them danged Bison tubes on pigeons rather than in trees, bushes, and shrubs. Free at last! Quote
+jahoadi and john Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 Harmon, do you think Jodi is still waiting for the results from her speed test? It's been a few hours now.... Pat...you are too Funny...but I don't have SNAGIT so how do I show you my results...which I don't think are good.... http://www.speedtest.net/result/944698862.png test Holy Mackerel! ... 0.66 Mb/s download speed, you call that a result? Make it seem better, call it 660 Kb/s. Honestly, I feel your pain. Here's Plan A: When you are holdin' the tin can up to your computer make sure that you keep th' strang taught; otherwise your bits will be all mushy. Mushy bits are a bad thang, technically-speaking wise. Plan B: This plan depends on you having an actual telephone line. If so use the "Check Availability" button at the link below to see if AT&T DSL Internet service is an option for you. If no phone line then maybe AT&T DSL Direct. AT&T DSL Service Plan C: Shoot girl, you live right under a mountain that has antennas sprouting from th' summit. Have John run a coax up top and patch into one of the Internet systems. Plan D: Next time John deploys pack up and go with him. Shoot, the've got decent Internet service on th' boat. Harmon...Plan A and C are the only feasible ones because those results were AT&T DSL !! [:0] John's ship can't even get GC.com since they started adding so many advertisements to the pages. I tried Plan A and it works ok since I only type with one hand so I can hold the tin can with the other. Plan C has me interested: How many feet of cable do you think it would take? Trouble is the rabbits eat everything out here unless it's buried so I bet that cable wouldn't last long . Do you think we could hold an event and get some help stringing that cable? Rumor has it there's a cache at the top..or very close to it. Can you imagine what life would be like if Jodi had good internet? Plan E: IP Over Avian Carriers (IPoAC) IP are the Internet Protocols and Avian Carriers are birds (specifically Carrier Pigeons). The round-trip packet times are probably not going to be great, but the raw bandwidth of a few carrier pigeons outfitted with microSD memory cards is at least 25 times the speed DSL or 5-10 times the speed of CableModem. Data errors due to coyote might be a problem but that can be addressed by using redundant birds (those of us in the telecom industry would call it "carrier diversity"). Frankly, I'm surprised that Harmon didn't think of this... Why I oughta .... IPoAC ... birds is birds ... ain't that what Twitter is all about? So data-rate expressed as Mb/s would be Mega Birds per second, yes? Sounds like a new spin on Cloud Computing ... how would you feel about Flock Computing? Hey Jodi, James may be onto something here. Lemme see, fifty pounds of bird seed from the feedstore and a back yard full of pigeon coops and you're good t' go. Thank goodness for small favors, now Jodi will be hanging them danged Bison tubes on pigeons rather than in trees, bushes, and shrubs. Free at last! You're all engineers......I need to remember that ...it explains alot. I still owe Calipers an IHO Engineers series. Those containers will be fun! Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 8, 2010 Posted September 8, 2010 (edited) This just in ... Jodi's flocking IPoAC broadbird service. (Eat your heart out Facebookers.) Edited September 8, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+jahoadi and john Posted September 9, 2010 Posted September 9, 2010 This just in ... Jodi's flocking IPoAC broadbird service. (Eat your heart out Facebookers.) Too Funny! Hey wait...are you picking on me? Quote
+TrailGators Posted September 9, 2010 Posted September 9, 2010 This just in ... Jodi's flocking IPoAC broadbird service. (Eat your heart out Facebookers.) Too Funny! Hey wait...are you picking on me? If those guys are Dilton and Archie then the gal must be Betty... Here is Betty with her caching bag. Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 9, 2010 Posted September 9, 2010 (edited) This just in ... Jodi's flocking IPoAC broadbird service. (Eat your heart out Facebookers.) Too Funny! Hey wait...are you picking on me? If those guys are Dilton and Archie then the gal must be Betty... Here is Betty with her caching bag. Well ... uhm, actually ... that's Jughead's body. Tell me Jodi dear, when did I ever pick on you? Edited September 9, 2010 by SD Rowdies Quote
+TrailGators Posted September 9, 2010 Posted September 9, 2010 This just in ... Jodi's flocking IPoAC broadbird service. (Eat your heart out Facebookers.) Too Funny! Hey wait...are you picking on me? If those guys are Dilton and Archie then the gal must be Betty... Here is Betty with her caching bag. Well ... uhm, actually ... that's Jughead's body. Tell me Jodi dear, when did I ever pick on you? Sorry about that Harmon. The missing hat and glasses threw me off... Quote
+SD Rowdies Posted September 9, 2010 Posted September 9, 2010 This just in ... Jodi's flocking IPoAC broadbird service. (Eat your heart out Facebookers.) Too Funny! Hey wait...are you picking on me? If those guys are Dilton and Archie then the gal must be Betty... Here is Betty with her caching bag. Well ... uhm, actually ... that's Jughead's body. Tell me Jodi dear, when did I ever pick on you? Sorry about that Harmon. The missing hat and glasses threw me off... So what about Veronica? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.