jmalterer Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 Hello, I am new to GPS units and I am looking to buy my own FINALLY. I am not sure to go with a rechargable or one that uses batteries. If anyone could shed some light on desiding that would be great! :lol: Thank you! Quote Link to comment
drew Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 Hello, I am new to GPS units and I am looking to buy my own FINALLY. I am not sure to go with a rechargable or one that uses batteries. If anyone could shed some light on desiding that would be great! :lol: Thank you! Luckily, GPS units don't go through alkaline batteries as rapidly as digital cameras, so the need for rechargables is not that urgent. But in the long run, there's certainly a cost savings to be realized by having a couple sets of NiMH cells, particularly if you're going to be using your unit quite often. I'd recommend a rapid charger (one hour or less), too. Drew Quote Link to comment
+Indotguy Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 My vote goes for a unit that uses standard batteries over a rechargeable cell. And if you going to use the GPS very much I would definitely go with rechargable NiMH batteries. Quote Link to comment
+garri Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 I also recommend NiMH, it works very well. I feel bad if i ahev to throw alkaline batteries, more polution due to jus playing with my GPSr. Quote Link to comment
+garri Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 Replacing a rechargeable cell will cost a lot of money. I have dozens of gadgets at home, and replacing old cells will cost me 200 € per year at least. Quote Link to comment
+embra Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 It depends on one's expected use. I used rechargeable NiMH AA's in my Meridian Platinum very satisfactorily. I have been even happier with the rechargeable Li-Ion in my explorist because I never have to swap batteries in and out. I bought a couple of replacement batteries on ebay for about $8 each, so I feel adequately prepared for the power needs I am likely to encounter. If you expect to run your GPSr continuously while in a wilderness situation such that you have no access to recharging facilities for something like 5 days or more, then you might find that AA's are better than Li-Ion. Also, some people prefer having the option to pop into any convenience store to buy new AA's if they discover on short notice that they need new batteries--something you can't do with proprietary Li-Ions. There was a rather lengthy thread on this topic in this forum this summer. Quote Link to comment
+Uncle T K Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 GET THE 15 MiNH Quote Link to comment
ImpalaBob Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 I use PowerX 2400 milliamphour rechargeable NiMh and am quite happy with them. I believe it's Energizer who is marketing a very reasonable package including a quick recharger. Remember to check the milliamphour rating before you buy ..... anything less than 2400 is old technology! ImpalaBob Quote Link to comment
+tls11823 Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 I just want to clarify the original question, since I'm not sure the replies so far are actually answering it. (Of course, it could just be me ) I interpret the question to be whether to buy a unit that has a built-in battery or one that will take standard batteries. I would say buy one that uses something standard like AAs, but use rechargable ones, such as those mentioned by others. You get the best of both worlds, and if you find yourself with run-down rechargables, you can pick up some regular AAs pretty much anywhere in a pinch. Quote Link to comment
+Miragee Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Yup . . . . that's what I say too. I got the 15-minute Energizer charger along with four Energizer NiMH batteries at Target for about $25.00. I love getting freshly-charged batteries in only 15 minutes. The NiMH batteries will save a lot of money . . . and they save the environment. Less waste for the landfill. Quote Link to comment
Neo_Geo Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 I think all of the various replies are answering the original question. So far it appears the tally is running 6 to 1 in favor of using rechargeables over a built-in rechargeable cell. Now add MY vote in favor of rechargeable batteries making it 7 to 1! That's 88% in favor of rechargeables and 12% for the built-in (so far). While you may be able to buy extra replacement cells and swap-out a built-in, you just never know exactly when you're gonna need that extra bit of juice that wasn't planned for. I've been caught offguard two or three times with my 60C since I got it nearly two years ago. Luckily I was able to buy a couple of alkalines when necessary. It just would'a ruined my day if I couldn't have kept my GPSr running on those occasions! Quote Link to comment
TigardDuo Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Sorry I don't have a specific URL, but MAHA battery charges are highly regarded in the digital camera field. Try Digital Camera Resource Page for reviews and links. I noticed in an older thread that someone had a headlamp that required 3 batteries, leading to charging difficulties. Many chargers require matched pairs of batteries to work at all. For a few more $$, MAHA provides a charger that will handle 4 AA or AAA batteries -individually- . It will charge 1, 2, 3, or 4 batteries, and sizes (and residual charge) can be mixed and matched at the same time. Highly recommended! (No, I don't own stock . . . ) ejg Quote Link to comment
rynd Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I use a portable hand held windmill, that way I don't have to worry about batteries. If there is no wind I just have to run very fast. Quote Link to comment
Neo_Geo Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 I use a portable hand held windmill, that way I don't have to worry about batteries. If there is no wind I just have to run very fast. Or you could just BLOW really hard! Quote Link to comment
rynd Posted September 21, 2005 Share Posted September 21, 2005 Kidding aside, the replacable rechargables (NiMH) are the way to go. Quote Link to comment
+archeangelsk2002 Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 i use the everyready 2500 milliamp hour nimh rechargables in my etrex legend, and my field radios. im am very happy with there performance. just remember, on the etrex,you have to go into the set up field, go into system, and change the battery type to nimh. in my field radios (motorola T7100's), the nimh batteries can last for 27 to 34 hours straight usage in scanning and recieving. on an 8 and a half hour charge. however, when i do a lot of transmitting, the nimh batteries tend to weaken in a shorter period of time. i keep a set of AA duracells on standby but primarily, all i use is the nimh batteries. regards archie Quote Link to comment
+megamapper Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 I find it 'difficult' the see the logic of buying a unit that uses a proprietery rechargable battery pack. When the batteries go dead, and you don't have: 1. - No 120V power source 2. - You don't want to stop what your doing, and wait 14 hours to recharge. Of course you could always contact the manufacturer, order up a spare set of batteries (they're cheap $50 - $70 bucks for ONE set). Now you at least if your one set goes dead, you can pop in the second set and keep going. Then there's the issue of what happens when eventually the built in batteries fail due to age. Then it's going to be $120-140 (they don't make the unit anymore, hence the jacked up price) for another set of batteries. A GPS that uses standard batteries (such as AA cells) run great, have long life (8-20 hours) and when they die, you can grab another set of batteries out of your pack, and away you go. Now the kinds of AA's you use is up to you. You can use regular alkaline batteries and throw them away. Heading over to Wallmart (the China Slave Goods that De-industrialize North America store), you can usually pick up a pack of 20 batteries for around 10-14 CDN. Or you can use NiHM AA's, and the unit works quite happily on these as well. If you're using your unit quite a-lot, then the NiHM idea makes sense. So I would say 'NOOOOOOO!!!!!' to getting a GPS with a proprietary rechargable battery system. It's a big drawback in my own humble opinion. Regards, ---- Robb ---- Quote Link to comment
+Old Sailor Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 for my 600 I got a spare off EBAY for 10.00 plus charger..........no need to spend big $$$$ on originals!!! Now I carry it as a spare. Quote Link to comment
+arie1 Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 (edited) Check this: http://forums.Groundspeak.com/GC/index.php...dpost&p=1707391 Any 5 volts dc powersupply will do I suppose. Edited September 22, 2005 by arie1 Quote Link to comment
+AO and CC Posted September 22, 2005 Share Posted September 22, 2005 I myself would rather have one that uses standard batteries and use rechargeables. One that is built in could be expensive to replace if need be. Energizer also has a portable and home use charger that charges in about 2-3 hours. That would work great if you were on the go alot, just need an extra set of batteries. Use a set while the others are charging. Wal-mart also has an offbrand that is a little cheaper that does the same thing. I also done a search on NiMH vs. NiCad. There is a company that is saving about $250,000 a year by switching from NiCad to NiMH. With all my wireless computer gadgets and GPSr I think I'll get me charger, saves a little $$$ in the long run. Wonder why I didn't think of this before. Quote Link to comment
jmalterer Posted September 23, 2005 Author Share Posted September 23, 2005 Well I would like to thank all of you for your input! I have appreciated all of your responses. I have decided to go with the batteries! It just seems to make the most sense. No I just have to choose the right GPS unit for ME.... I do alot of hiking and think I will go with the Foretrex 101.... thoughts? Thank you again ... Quote Link to comment
+Thrak Posted September 23, 2005 Share Posted September 23, 2005 Since you are going with rechargable batteries I highly suggest the Energizer 15-Minute recharger. I paid a little extra and got the one that also has a cigarette lighter plug. It came with 4 AA and 2 AAA batteries. It charges at home plugged into the wall or on the road plugged into the cigarette lighter and in both cases charges in 15 minutes. I'm extremely happy with mine. Quote Link to comment
CenTexDodger Posted September 23, 2005 Share Posted September 23, 2005 I know you have already made your decision, but I want to give my $0.02. I use alkalines exclusively. I tried to use rechargeables, but to me, it turned into a hassle (of course that was when a "quick"charger took 4 hours). I also did not like the fact that once you charged them, they seemed to bleed their charge very quickly. I would put "fresh" batteries into my GPS, and it would show only half charged. Also, they did not last as long on a charge than a set of alkys do. Alkalines have a long shelf life, are cheap--about $0.30 per cell, and will last a long time in my 60cs. Quote Link to comment
+Miragee Posted September 23, 2005 Share Posted September 23, 2005 Different brands of rechargeable batteries give different results. I have several different brands and discovered that the off-brands did not last very long in my GPSr. I use the off brands in my TV Remote and my optical mouse. For the GPSr, I have been very happy with the Energizer 15-minute batteries. They last for well over 12 hours in my Vista C and I don't have to continually buy more batteries and add batteries to the landfill. Quote Link to comment
+Indotguy Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 (edited) Is anyone aware of a correlation between the types of NiMH chargers (i.e. 15 min., 30 min., 1 hour or more) and power drain or cell longevity? Edited September 24, 2005 by Indotguy Quote Link to comment
+Uncle T K Posted September 24, 2005 Share Posted September 24, 2005 If you are going to use recharageable batteries then get the 15 minute NiMH. The older type recharagables are junk compared to the 15 minute rechargable time. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.