Jump to content

Travel Bug / Finds Ratio


Ratone

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have wondered whether other players or other areas have a higher ratio / regular cache finds than me (only regular+multicache count).

 

My ratio: 13 / 136 = 9.5%

State, Country: Madrid, Spain

 

What's yours? Where? If you do not have more than 50 finds the ratio might distort the statistics so please do not include yours.

 

I can not start a poll so if any of you are able and interested in this, please consider this topic as yours and please initiate a poll.

Edited by Ratone
Posted
My ratio: 13 / 136 = 9.5%

State, Country: Madrid, Spain

My ratio: 1270 / 2052 = 61.9%

State, Country: Massachusetts, USA

 

There are others in the area with HIGHER ratios than mine.

 

-WR

Posted (edited)
I have wondered whether other players or other areas have a higher ratio / regular cache finds than me (only regular+multicache count).

 

My ratio: 13 / 136 = 9.5%

State, Country: Madrid, Spain........

My ratio: 6 / 93 = 6.45%

State, Country: Panama City, FL........

 

(Edited to correct speelin is you's?)

Edited by Jester2112
Posted

Thanks Atlanta. Would it be possible to know your ratio with only standard TBs? Geocoins and Jeeps are hard to find outside USA so in order to compare apples with apples...

Posted

My guess is that the average will be around 25%. Does it make sense?

 

That's just what ours is, if you count only regular travel bugs: 92/358 = 25.7%.

(If you include coins and Jeeps, it's 108/358 = 30.2%.)

 

State, Country: Massachusetts, USA

Posted (edited)

Travel bug traders haven't checked in here yet. There are many geocachers that have up to 4 times as many tb finds as cache finds. And that is yet another spontaneous variation of this game.

Edited by Team Sagefox
Posted (edited)

Ummm...36/199 = 18%. I really like TB's, but I like to be fussy about them. Usually, at a minimum post a picture and move it quickly, if not help it along more substantially. That cuts down on the number I'm able to pick up.

 

Oops! Edited to add: Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Edited by AuntieWeasel
Posted
Thanks Atlanta. Would it be possible to know your ratio with only standard TBs? Geocoins and Jeeps are hard to find outside USA so in order to compare apples with apples...

336/1789 or 18.78

 

But coins and jeeps ARE TBs

Posted

11 regular TBs, 151 regular/multi-caches = 7.3%

 

In my first year of caching (2004), I didn't see many travel bugs at first. They seemed to become more common in my area later in 2004.

 

Location: Barrie, Ontario, CANADA.

Posted (edited)

Oh... forgot to answer the question. 8.136% ratio. For a year though I have been passing up tb's. Now they are kind of fun again.

 

Oh... still not paying attention. 105 tb's/1093 container caches = 9.6%

 

Oh... no jeeps, coins or that cool moun10bike coin in our collection = 9.05%

Edited by Team Sagefox
Posted (edited)

My stats:

 

Travel Bugs Only / Traditional and Multi Caches Only

31 / 352 = 8.8%

 

However, I don’t really know why other actual “box-type” caches with logbooks don’t count (in my case mainly Unknown Caches, which often have Travel Bugs, and to exclude them makes this whole study pointless depending on what is popular in your area). So, I’m including those as well now:

 

Travel Bugs Only / Traditional, Multis, Unknown, Project APE and Letterbox Hybrids

31 / 424 = 7.3% (it's 31 / 420 = 7.4% without the APE or Letterboxes).

 

Most of my T.B. trading occurs in Unknown Puzzle caches, so it seems odd to exclude them from the count. Of course, I didn’t include Events, Locationless or Virtuals.

 

Seattle, WA

 

On a side note, I do know one local cacher whose ratio is 292.5% of Bugs found to Traditionals and Multis. At least you know that he’ll move them around!

 

Edited to add: "Oh, I thought this was the Travel Bug thread!"

Edited by fauxSteve
Posted
However, I don’t really know why other actual “box-type” caches with logbooks don’t count (in my case mainly Unknown Caches, which often have Travel Bugs, and to exclude them makes this whole study pointless depending on what is popular in your area). So, I’m including those as well now:

I don't think anyone is excluding those caches in these counts. I believe OP meant to include all container caches.

Posted

It was not my intention to exclude anything, I was starting a pseudo-poll and had to set up a common measurement formula, any variation of the formula is as valid as this one as long everybody uses the same one.

 

By the way I have noticed that average is below-around 15%.

Posted (edited)

65/616 = 10.5% (no jeeps or coins included)

 

74/616 = 12% (jeeps and coins counted)

 

but I know I got some of those bugs at events (can't remember how many) and I haven't included the events in the cache total so that throws off that number ---- :lol:

 

OH well :D

Edited by NevaP
Posted

it amazes how people like to "pad" their stats.

 

I pulled up a few of the cachers that had alot of TB finds. Many were logged in and and out of events - basically they are just handling the tb and some events just hand out a list of tb with the numbers to log. how childish.

Posted

2094 bugs-jeeps-coins

to 2212 Caches for 94.7 %

 

There are others that have ratios over 100% collecting the bugs more than the caches as :

 

MaxB on the River

Feathers

Wagonwheel

NBJPoppa

Team Min Dawg

 

To name a few.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...