Jump to content

If Money Were No Object ...


lumpynose

Recommended Posts

It seems like you can get color ones that don't take memory expansion cards, or grayscale ones that do take an expansion card, but not color with an expansion card.

 

Anyhow, I'm new to geocaching and thought I'd ask what handheld gps you'd get if you didn't have to worry about the cost.

 

Thanks

Link to comment
It seems like you can get color ones that don't take memory expansion cards, or grayscale ones that do take an expansion card, but not color with an expansion card.

SUre you can ... Look at Explorist 500 & 600. Color, expansion cards, standards-compliant USB, and more.

 

Now if only they would work the bugs out of the firmware and get a handle on basic QC issues.

 

... thought I'd ask what handheld gps you'd get if you didn't have to worry about the cost.

For me personally, Lowrance iFinder H2O -- and other Lowrance models offer all of the bells and whistles at very competitve pricing. Because money IS a concern!

Edited by lee_rimar
Link to comment
Money was no object. I would get a 60C and pay someone to soldier in more RAM so I had enough for my entire normal caching area. That way I would not have to load maps or waypoints and so on. It would just work.

Since money is no object, you'll presumably have an EE on retainer to deal with the possibility of missing chip select/decode lines on the bus and/or a firmware guy to deal with the possibility that the software is looking at unit ID's to set up address space and memory maps. As a practical matter, they may very well be retrofitting a 76C or a Quest 2 into a 60C's injection mold. Surface mount chips and cycle times in the nanosecond range pretty much ended the days of piggybacking 4016s and 2732s atop each other and running an extra address line down the top.

 

Stated another way, please don't think it's necessarily as trivial as RK makes it sound. :-)

 

But back to the original question, the perfect GPS for _me_ isn't necessarily the perfect GPS for _you_, even if money were no object for either of us.[1] We will have different things we do with them, different likes and dilikes, and different ergonomics. For example, my nimble fingers don't mind a 60 or an explorist - my father who made a living holding power tools for decade couldn't possibly type on those, let alone see them - he'd be much happier with a 76/Meridian/Explorist XL. But the big size would drive me batty.

 

[1] Which is one reason I tend to avoid these threads. By the time you've extracted what the question poster actually wants a GPS for, the question is usually already lost in an avalanche of "I have an XXX and love it..." posts...

Link to comment

I'd get two units:

-- Legend Color for hiking and benchmarking (24mb is plenty for this use)

-- some real expensive dedicated car unit for cross country travel

 

If I were forced to pick just one unit, then I wouldn't buy any of them until someone came out with a unit that had: color TFT display, fast processor, 1-2gb of built-in memory, memory expansion slot (SD), USB 2.0 connectivity, and a AA power supply.

 

Until then, I'll continue to use my b&w Legend and AAA maps for the car.

Link to comment

I think I might try a Garmin 96C Handheld Aviation unit, it's color screen, has airport / airspace maps, and autorouting for the car, plus IPX7 ruggedness and other handy features.

 

But I'm still a Lowrance fan, and if money was no object, I would go for an I-finder Hunt or H2O, AirMap 2000c and a I-Way 1000, but 2 of those aren't handhelds.

Link to comment

:laughing: First I bought a Rino 130 love it. But what good is it without the matching rino to use the radio and locating features So I bought a Rino 120 on ebay. I now can keep track of my grandchildren.

 

But all along the screen was just to small and to dark my old eyes have trouble seeing it. So I bought a new Garmin 76cs. Just got it today. Love it but...... no antenna so I can't pack it in my waist pack as I did with the rino letting the antenna stick out and mapping trails.

 

Now I am so broke. I don't know what I was thinking. My grandchildren probably won't be able to go to college

 

I would love a combination of the 2 rino and 76cs.

Link to comment
:laughing: First I bought a Rino 130 love it.  But what good is it without the matching rino to use the radio and locating features So I bought a Rino 120 on ebay.  I now can keep track of my grandchildren.

 

But all along the screen was just to small and to dark my old eyes have trouble seeing it.  So I bought a new Garmin 76cs.  Just got it today.  Love it but...... no antenna so I can't pack it in my waist pack as I did with the rino letting the antenna stick out and mapping trails. 

 

Now I am so broke.  I don't know what I was thinking.  My grandchildren probably won't be able to go to college

 

I would love a combination of the 2 rino and 76cs.

I carry my 76CS sometimes in the Garmin carrying case - the plain case with no plastic window - hooked to my cache bag and it usually keeps the signal. If you have issues with that and can't keep a signal simply buy a $20 Glisson antenna on eBay and wear a hat with a little pocket on it to hold the antenna. You can make your own or buy one ready made with a pocket for the antenna. It's a standard baseball cap type of hat. I read where one cacher always wears a plastic hard hat to which he has superglued a large washer. He uses the washer for the magnetic mount of the antenna.

 

The 76CS is a great unit and I don't think it needs that protruding antenna that the Rino has. It uses a different type of antenna that I haven't had any problems with.

Link to comment

A GPS with one of those flexible roll-up screens, the size of a magic marker when the screen is rolled up. Should have all the bells and whistles, memory card bluetooth, wifi, usb, waterproof, cellphone, camera. And last but not least, the perfect OS that handles all the functions (geocaching/autorouting/phone/camera....) flawlessly, effortlessly and intuitively without an overdose of menus and settings but still allowing access to customize all advanced features. Oh yeah and a Google Earth like interface, yeah gotta have that.

Off-course it would have to run on a fuel cell (and money being no object I wouldn't have to care about airline regulations as I'd have my own plane :laughing: )

 

Not gonna happen, guess I'll just stick to my 60C and 2610 for now ...

Link to comment
Tricorder

I had one--didn't like it. Looked great on the showroom floor, but in the field proved to be way too noisy and kept attracting too much attention from muggle Klingons. They should have had an option to turn the sound off, but I guess they weren't too concerned about battery life.

Problem with tricorders is that dylithium crystals only last so long and they're getting expensive after the solar storms on Rygal IV. What were they thinking running off those things? Might as well run 'em off gold plated latinum. This replacing them every century change is getting real old...

 

And did you notice they use special crystals? Sheesh.... :laughing:

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...