+PULASKI Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 Greetings! When first heard about geocaching there were NO caches in Pennsylvania ( as of today there are 2504 ). I was wondering if anyone knows who the first 100 or 500 or 1000 cachers are? Just think - the first person, or maybe even the Top 100, could wear a special crown and visit GC events like royalty!! Hey, it works for CCCooperAgency as kings and queens of numbers!! :-p Your thoughts? Sincerely, PULASKI Quote Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 (edited) ...I was wondering if anyone knows who the first 100 or 500 or 1000 cachers are? ... Kinda. Using the following format, you could pull up profiles for the first 100 profiles created. Of course, there are some socks in there and some people that created a profile, but never logged finds. http://www.geocaching.com/profile/?id=10294 Edited August 4, 2005 by sbell111 Quote Link to comment
+Mopar Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 (edited) Not worth it Edited August 4, 2005 by Mopar Quote Link to comment
+El Diablo Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 I would be more interested in seeing the list as the oldest members that are still active. As it is people created accounts but never found a cache or stopped playing after a few weeks or months. El Diablo Quote Link to comment
+mtn-man Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 Just think - the first person, or maybe even the Top 100, could wear a special crown and visit GC events like royalty!! Hey, it works for CCCooperAgency as kings and queens of numbers!! :-p Your thoughts? My thoughts? The Forum Guidelines (at the top of every forum page) Some things to keep in mind when posting: Respect: Respect the guidelines for forum usage, and site usage. Respect Groundspeak, its employees, volunteers, yourself, fellow community members, and guests on these boards. Whether a community member has one post or 5,000 posts, they deserve the same respect. Quote Link to comment
+deimos444 Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 I would be more interested in seeing the list as the oldest members that are still active. As it is people created accounts but never found a cache or stopped playing after a few weeks or months. El Diablo Quote Link to comment
Apollo Bob Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 (edited) It's been fairly entertaining to follow sbell111's suggestion and browse around at profile #2. Edited August 4, 2005 by Apollo Bob Quote Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted August 4, 2005 Share Posted August 4, 2005 My thoughts? The Forum Guidelines (at the top of every forum page) Some things to keep in mind when posting: Respect: Respect the guidelines for forum usage, and site usage. Respect Groundspeak, its employees, volunteers, yourself, fellow community members, and guests on these boards. Whether a community member has one post or 5,000 posts, they deserve the same respect. For the life of me, I can't figure out what that guideline has to do with this topic. Quote Link to comment
+El Diablo Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 My thoughts? The Forum Guidelines (at the top of every forum page) Some things to keep in mind when posting: Respect: Respect the guidelines for forum usage, and site usage. Respect Groundspeak, its employees, volunteers, yourself, fellow community members, and guests on these boards. Whether a community member has one post or 5,000 posts, they deserve the same respect. For the life of me, I can't figure out what that guideline has to do with this topic. I think it has to do with the comment made about CCCooperAgency. That remark could be viewed as derogatory. I personally wasn't sure how the statement was intended, so if there are doubts by anyone, it probably shouldn't have been posted. I don't believe your sign on date or the number of finds that you have cause others to treat you nice. I believe it's the respect that you earn from the community regardless of any of the above. El Diablo Quote Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Well, if I show up at the next event wearing a crown, I hope somebody will at least give me a bow. Quote Link to comment
+Mopar Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Subject: [GEO] PULASKI contacting you from Geocaching.com -This message was sent through http://www.geocaching.com -- Then why post? Just so you can (again) see your name in print????? User's Profile: http://www.geocaching.com/profile/?guid=af...6b-859e044bd435 ------------------------------------------------------------ This email was sent without a return email address. You will need to respond to this email through the Geocaching.com Web site. Visit http://www.geocaching.com and log in to respond to the message from your "my cache page". And yet again. Quote Link to comment
+PULASKI Posted August 5, 2005 Author Share Posted August 5, 2005 Greetings. Focus people, focus. Numerous posters and only 1 that attempts to answer my question. I think some people need to study SBELL111's Creed with attention to #3. I took offense at El Diablo's statement that people can't say something if it MIGHT offend someone. That PC-thinking is one reason why America has problems. When you are The King of the Hill - i.e. the CCCAs, The President of the USA or a famous Hollywood celebrity - you have to expect people to sling comments at you. If that offends you - note the small :-p symbol after my comment. Lynn and company are great people - just wacky wacky wacky as geocachers. Do the math - it would be hard to deny that statement when you look at their pace. Wacky isn't neccessarily a bad thing - its just a departure from the norm. Hopefully my comments didn't offend anyone. If they did - I am not sure how I will live with myself. <---------------------------- see that little guy? Sincerely, PULASKI Quote Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 (edited) I can't believe that people read my creed. BTW, I've been called wacky, on occasion. Sometimes by myself. Tis all good. Edited August 5, 2005 by sbell111 Quote Link to comment
+El Diablo Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Greetings. Focus people, focus. Numerous posters and only 1 that attempts to answer my question. I think some people need to study SBELL111's Creed with attention to #3. I took offense at El Diablo's statement that people can't say something if it MIGHT offend someone. That PC-thinking is one reason why America has problems. When you are The King of the Hill - i.e. the CCCAs, The President of the USA or a famous Hollywood celebrity - you have to expect people to sling comments at you. If that offends you - note the small :-p symbol after my comment. Lynn and company are great people - just wacky wacky wacky as geocachers. Do the math - it would be hard to deny that statement when you look at their pace. Wacky isn't neccessarily a bad thing - its just a departure from the norm. Hopefully my comments didn't offend anyone. If they did - I am not sure how I will live with myself. <---------------------------- see that little guy? Sincerely, PULASKI I agree with you completely about PC, I even did a nice article about it in the magazine. However PC normally applies to groups or general ideas, not an individual person. You singled out Lynn. Like I said, I wasn't sure how you meant that comment. There have been a lot of stabs made at Lynn on these forums and some of us feel protective of her. Maybe it would have been better to have said the person with the most finds. I didn't mean to offend you, I just pointed out why mtn-man made the comment that he did, or I think that's why he made it. Anyways I hope there are no hard feelings. El Diablo Quote Link to comment
WH Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Aa a Christian, I find the little devil avatar offensive. Quote Link to comment
vagabond Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Greetings! When first heard about geocaching there were NO caches in Pennsylvania ( as of today there are 2504 ). I was wondering if anyone knows who the first 100 or 500 or 1000 cachers are? Your thoughts? Sincerely, PULASKI Well your #615 Quote Link to comment
+Miragee Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Wow. PULASKI deserves a bow! I'm number 309,782 Quote Link to comment
+Mr. Fantastic Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 I am pleased to announce that I am number 178004. If only I'd waited three people I could call myself 007. Quote Link to comment
+El Diablo Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Aa a Christian, I find the little devil avatar offensive. But he's a friendly devil! El Diablo Quote Link to comment
+mtn-man Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 I didn't mean to offend you, I just pointed out why mtn-man made the comment that he did, or I think that's why he made it. You were exactly correct. I took offense at El Diablo's statement that people can't say something if it MIGHT offend someone. That PC-thinking is one reason why America has problems. When you are The King of the Hill - i.e. the CCCAs, The President of the USA or a famous Hollywood celebrity - you have to expect people to sling comments at you. "Slinging comments" at other cachers in the forums is against the forum guidelines. It is rude and frowned upon in the forums. Treat all other cachers as you expect to be treated. Being a top geocacher is far from being the President of the United States. Quote Link to comment
+EraSeek Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 4497 here saying hello. Any one seen my good friend 24 lately? He took off for Idaho and I haven't seen him since. Maybe he's out hiking with 3. 3's really been hitting the trails this year. Or maybe 24 is just resting up from another Wednesday Night Wannabee's trip with 286779 and 116413 again. Anyway. hope he's well. Quote Link to comment
+The Leprechauns Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 4497 here saying hello. Any one seen my good friend 24 lately? He took off for Idaho and I haven't seen him since. Maybe he's out hiking with 3. 3's really been hitting the trails this year. Or maybe 24 is just resting up from another Wednesday Night Wannabee's trip with 286779 and 116413 again. Anyway. hope he's well. The scary thing is, I followed all of that without having to look up any of the numbers, and I live on the other side of the continent! I've found two of 4497's caches while in the company of 3 and 24. One of 4497's caches was so nice, I came back across the country just to visit it again! Signed, 57636 Quote Link to comment
+EraSeek Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Why thank you , 57636, that's very kind of you! If you come back again there are a couple more nearby I think you'd enjoy. Quote Link to comment
+Team Perks Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 (cough) (cough) weirdos (cough) (cough) Quote Link to comment
+budd-rdc Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 So are people like Mike Teague (first FTF) and James Coburn (hid the first cache in CA) completely out of the sport now? I figured Jeremy, Elias, and Moun10Bike ought to be in the first 100. Is my attempt to make this on topic futile? Quote Link to comment
+Ambrosia Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 (edited) I feel like we're suddenly in the middle of Les Miserables. I'm 24601. Edited August 5, 2005 by Ambrosia Quote Link to comment
+Newfiezedder Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Ok, a newb here, I did this the hard way most likely, 84928, listed all users by joined date and went back until I found me. I couldn't see it anywhere else, was there and easier way for other curious cachers? Greg Quote Link to comment
Clan Riffster Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Being a top geocacher is far from being the President of the United States. Yeah, anybody can be President. Quote Link to comment
+Mastifflover Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Ok someone please tell the dumb guy, that's me how to figure out what number you are. Quote Link to comment
Keystone Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Ok, a newb here, I did this the hard way most likely, 84928, listed all users by joined date and went back until I found me. I couldn't see it anywhere else, was there and easier way for other curious cachers?Greg Ok someone please tell the dumb guy, that's me how to figure out what number you are. Hover your mouse over anyone's name next to their forum post, above their avatar. This is a hyperlink to the poster's profile page. The URL ends with the poster's user ID number. You can see it in the information bar at the bottom of your browser. Quote Link to comment
Yankees Win! Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 (edited) I agree with you completely about PC, I even did a nice article about it in the magazine. However PC normally applies to groups or general ideas, not an individual person. You singled out Lynn. Like I said, I wasn't sure how you meant that comment. There have been a lot of stabs made at Lynn on these forums and some of us feel protective of her. Maybe it would have been better to have said the person with the most finds. Actually, you singled out Lynn. The OP mentioned CCCooperAgency, which is merely a username associated with, at various times, anywhere from 1 to 4 people. Before I get attacked for merely mentioning their username, please allow me to include that I am very happy for CCCooperAgency that they enjoy geocaching as much as they obviously do. All the best to them and theirs. I'm 386887, and I saw nothing wrong with the OP's comment. Anyone who read anything more into it than appeared in black-and-white should feel free to examine why they interpreted it the way they did. Edited August 5, 2005 by Yankees Win! Quote Link to comment
+wimseyguy Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 68778 checking in to report that I'm having lots of FUN! I think it is an interesting topic, and would be curious how many of the original 100,500 even 1000 are still active. Just remember that you shouldn't judge someone by their numbers, but by their actions. Now back to your normal scheduled programming. Quote Link to comment
+Joe Smith Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 i was not offended, You live near Lynn so you know her better than I do. But thatnks for moving my TB. It was sitting in the event for a while I thought it was lost for good. 60182 Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 I'm 23324. If only I had registered earlier, I could have been 23323. Quote Link to comment
Yankees Win! Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 I'm 23324. If only I had registered earlier, I could have been 23323. Too bad you didn't register 8 people later. 23332 would have been so symmetrical. Quote Link to comment
+the hermit crabs Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 I'm 23324. If only I had registered earlier, I could have been 23323. Too bad you didn't register 8 people later. 23332 would have been so symmetrical. Dang, if we had registered just one day earlier than we did we might have gotten #200000. Looking at the user numbers & sign-up dates for the last few months, it looks like there are about 10,000 new accounts every 17 days or so. So we should hit 500,000 by about Nov 25... I wonder if balloons will fall from the ceiling, confetti will be tossed, and party-horns will toot? Someone should make a cake. Quote Link to comment
Mushtang Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Hey Jeremy, number 10 isn't currently being used. Can I be moved to 10? Quote Link to comment
+geognerd Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Just looked at user #3. It looks like our illustrious leader is so busy that he can only cache every few weeks. But that might be a good thing. Imagine what would happen to this place if everyone at Groundspeak spent all their time geocaching! Quote Link to comment
+Marky Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 If that offends you - note the small :-p symbol after my comment. Lynn and company are great people - just wacky wacky wacky as geocachers. Do the math - it would be hard to deny that statement when you look at their pace. Wacky isn't neccessarily a bad thing - its just a departure from the norm. It's times like these that I wish I could remember Dru's old tagline about people who cache more than you and those that cache less that you. Does anyone remember the exact text? Oh I found it: Ever notice how anyone that caches more than you do is a maniac, while anyone that caches less than you do is an idiot? -Dru Morgan I certainly don't consider Joani or myself wacky at all regarding geocaching. We happen to enjoy geocaching, and during our spare time (which we have a fair amount, since our kids are grown), mostly on weekends, we go geocaching. We have fun. What's wacky about that? --Marky Quote Link to comment
+deimos444 Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 (edited) I have started kind of slowly but as I go along I am gaining momentum. At first it was hard to find the caches but now I am learning to be more aware of where things can be hidden. I am also gaining respect for the other cachers in my area. Lots of inventive locations. Maybe someone will write a biography of the "early cachers." When you look at how many are brought together by Groundspeak it is amazing. And hey guys, roll with the punches. I know we should be nice and follow the forum rules but free speech can be a little nasty at times. I think a good general rule is if you are mad, don't post right away. Give it a little time. 236929= number of mistakes I have paid for. Edited August 5, 2005 by deimos444 Quote Link to comment
+sept1c_tank Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Hello, I'm 119047. I planned my debut into the geocaching community very carefully. If you square 11, and add 9, you get my IQ. 0 represents my ex-spouse, and 47 is the year of my birth! Quote Link to comment
+Joypa Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 Wow! I'm # 230,621. Woopty freakin doo. If you square 23 and add my hat size, you get a really weird number. Quote Link to comment
+Bjorn74 Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 I would be more interested in seeing the list as the oldest members that are still active. ...El Diablo Around these parts, they think I'm 10,000 years old. I guess that means I qualify in the hearts of COG, huh? Quote Link to comment
+Joypa Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 New rule: Higher numbered members must worship lower numbered members. Quote Link to comment
+Miragee Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 New rule: Higher numbered members must worship lower numbered members. Quote Link to comment
+Allen_L Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 New rule: Higher numbered members must worship lower numbered members. Sound good to me. I am number 3786. Quote Link to comment
+sept1c_tank Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 (edited) Poor Trinomad (our newest member--288292), He's destined to bow out. Edit: Allow me to clearify, Trinomad is the newest member in the forums; hoxbox--433723 is the newest member. Edited August 5, 2005 by sept1c_tank Quote Link to comment
+Renegade Knight Posted August 5, 2005 Share Posted August 5, 2005 37117 here. I'm such a newbie. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.