Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for 'bmw������ ������������������������katalk:PC53���200%������ ��������� ������ ������������'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Geocaching HQ communications
    • Geocaching HQ communications
  • General geocaching discussions
    • How do I...?
    • General geocaching topics
    • Trackables
    • Geocache types and additional GPS-based gameplay
  • Adventure Lab® Discussions
    • Playing Adventures
    • Creating Adventures
  • Community
    • Geocaching Discussions by Country
  • Bug reports and feature discussions
    • Website
    • Official Geocaching® apps
    • Authorized Developer applications (API)
  • Geocaching and...
    • GPS technology and devices

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Location

  1. The announcement was made in mid-October. You consider 5 1/2 weeks before Thanksgiving to be "right before the holidays"? Considering the vast majority of geocachers don't visit the forums it certainly did fly under the radar. Was it ever mentioned in the weekly emails from Groundspeak? Groundspeak is a business. Since the vast majority of their perceived customers have less than 100 lifetime Finds their decision-making is aimed primarily at those cachers. If getting rid of benchmarks costs Groundspeak 100 PMs (and I doubt it will), but new feature Groundspeak is going to roll out after getting the old benchmarking code out of the way gets them 200 new PMs that's a win for Groundspeak. And the new feature will be used worldwide instead of only in the US. Unlike most aspects of geocaching.com, Benchmarking could only ever appeal to half the customer base because of its geographical limitations. As long as Groundspeak is a for-profit business it will do what they think is best for business. Trying to keep 1% of geocachers happy isn't important for business.
  2. The new search result release seems to have solved this problem. (It did create a lot of other problems that have been or are being fixed.) I want to thank GS for fixing this issue. The new remaining difficulty, for me, is that now one can only add at most 200 caches at a time from a filtered search result to a list. I understand from another thread that this issue is being addressed. Of course, one can add additional caches from the search in batches of 200, so it is not a big problem.
  3. The new layout only shows a maximum of 200 search results at one time. I use the search feature mainly to create lists of caches. This restriction makes working with list very tedious. Before the update I did a search, getting maybe 840 results and could export them to a list with two clicks. Now I have to export the first 200, then the next and so on. Very user-un-friendly!
  4. When filtering by United Kingdom all caches with the name containing village hall series on a mobile this is the result I get. - The names are so truncated that the numbers and location are missing so they all have the same name. - They are not sorted by home location but some random point in UK (the first one in the list is 150 km from my home) - if I chose to change the column from favourites I can only pick one filter at a time and Difficulty and terrain are separate so no option to see D/T - no option to see date I found the cache. - glad that the search is now separated into tabs of 200 but there are 1200 caches in the series but I can still only see 1000 - why are there only 5 tabs available?. (Which 200 are missing as it is not the furthest from home - so is it a random selection that are not shown?) When I changed the search to from home location rather than United Kingdom with the same name search name contains it bought up a list which was headed ‘date found’ although they appear to be sorted as furthest from home as the first on the list which was actually 879km from home in northern Scotland (I am South coast England). I then chose to display by closest distance (via 3 dots) and the mileage displayed was in thousands of km. It still did not bring up closest to home and no idea where it sets the distance from (maybe America) I have been unable to find a way to sort the list by closest to home at all as it doesn’t seem to recognise my location although it is entered correctly in settings. I have also noticed when changing the filters via the three dots - if you are on for example distance, click the 3 dots for alternatives but decide you don’t want to change it, there is no option to either abort the search with an X or re choose the one you are already on ( In this example distance) therefore I had to choose another option and then go back again to revert to distance. please give us the option to use the old search until you can resolve the problems
  5. (This information is repeated from a just-published Geocaching Blog post.) Get ready for Virtual Rewards 3.0! 2022 is the Year of the Hide. As part of this, Geocaching HQ is thrilled to reward cache owners who have given so much to the game with Virtual Rewards 3.0, a limited number of Virtual Caches for the geocaching community. An opt-in web page is now available for cachers to apply for a Virtual Reward. The page is open until February 26, 2022. Approximately 50,000 geocachers around the world meet the criteria to apply for a Virtual Reward. Those who previously received a Virtual Reward are not eligible to participate in Virtual Rewards 3.0. From all applicants, Geocaching HQ will randomly select up to 4,000 geocachers (with geographic distribution) on March 1, 2022 to receive one Virtual Cache. Approximately 30 new community volunteers are receiving a Virtual Reward, as a thanks for giving their time to support the geocaching community. Winners will have one year to create their Virtual Cache. The caches must comply with specific guidelines. The first two rounds of Virtual Rewards have resulted in more than 6,200 new Virtual Caches caches created between August 2017 and December 2021. Those new caches are very popular by several measures, including total Favorite points, Favorite point percentage, log length, and find frequency. In addition, the review process has not created any undue burden on community volunteer reviewers. One of the most exciting aspects of the new Virtuals is that they are now located in a wider range of countries. Prior to Virtual Rewards, most Virtual Caches were in the United States. In fact, 81% of old Virtual Caches (placed prior to 2006) are in the United States. With the launch of Virtual Rewards 1.0 and 2.0, only 15% of the new Virtuals are in the United States and Virtuals now exist in 155 countries. See the following pie charts for the differences. Global distribution of Virtual Caches before Virtual Rewards: Global distribution of Virtual Rewards Caches 1.0 and 2.0.: Here are answers to common questions: Does this mean Virtuals are back for good? Not exactly. Yes, we’re hoping to see up to 4,000 new Virtual Caches in the next year. But we want to make it clear that Virtuals remain a legacy cache type. Are Virtual Rewards distributed evenly among countries? No. Countries vary in land area and the number of active geocachers. We use an algorithm to help distribute Virtuals among countries, while favoring countries still growing in geocaching. We set the qualifying criteria for cache hiders as low as possible, in order to achieve better geographic distribution. The approximately 50,000 cache hiders who meet the Virtual Reward 3.0 criteria represent 88 countries. During the 2019 launch, they were from 89 countries, a significant increase from 63 countries during the 2017 launch. Can I apply with more than one account that I own? If you own more than one Geocaching account, please apply only with one account. If we discover abuse, we reserve the right to remove a Virtual Reward. Could an account receive more than one Virtual Reward from Geocaching HQ? No, Geocaching HQ will not be providing an account more than one Virtual Reward, from the 2017, 2019, or 2022 launches. How do I find out when new Virtual Rewards are published? Premium members can set up Instant notifications to be aware when new Virtual Rewards are published. All members can use filters to conduct a worldwide search for Virtuals. Will there be more Virtual Rewards in the future? Assuming Virtual Rewards 3.0 goes smoothly, we will consider launching a similar set of Virtuals in the future. We would likely continue to make adjustments to the selection process to encourage new participants. Combined with previous Virtual Reward launches, are there too many Virtual Caches now? There are currently around 10,600 Virtual Caches, which is 0.3% of the world’s 3,326,000 active caches. Even if this new launch adds 4,000 new Virtual Caches, they will still only account for 0.4% of all active caches. Why not just make Virtual Caches available for everyone to hide? Because today’s Virtual Caches are rare, and because the remaining Virtuals tend to be well-liked, people often forget (or maybe never knew) that many problems led to the Virtual becoming a legacy cache type in 2005. The Virtual Cache type was originally created so people could place hides where physical caches were not permitted, or where muggles were so heavy that a physical cache was not practical. While the intent of this cache type was positive, it created significant problems for reviewers and often led to poor cache quality. Some people used Virtual Caches as a shortcut to create basic caches that did not require maintenance. Guidelines were eventually updated to require Virtuals to have special qualities to set them apart from other caches. However, that introduced so much subjectivity that the review process became difficult for both reviewers and cachers. The decision was finally made for the Virtual to become a legacy cache type and no longer permit them unless we could find a way to avoid the aforementioned issues. We feel that these limited Virtual Rewards release have helped to minimize the previous problems with Virtuals, while delivering more opportunities for the community to enjoy this beloved cache type. Most importantly, it’s a fun reward for cache owners who have contributed so much to the game.
  6. I just started Waymarking a couple weeks ago and have found a lot of waymarks where the point of interest, building, business, or object in question are missing. So far I have logged these as "visits" or "finds" but others have told me now that this is incorrect. What is the official ruling on logging a waymark find or visit? What counts? Just to add some details. I have found a little over 200 waymarks, and so far for about 30-40% of these, the waymarks object or reference point was clearly gone. I imagine that many of the other waymark sites in our area are also missing as most of them have never been visited by anyone and most the pages appear to be updated prior to 2010. Just to clarify, I am using the term "Visit" and "Find" to mean the same the thing since this is what is counted on the waymark website. There are a plethora of additional logging requirements I have seen which are also very confusing. Here are some of the scenarios: A waymark at a sculpture where the sculpture is totally gone and removed from the park. Do I log that the sculpture is gone, post a picture of the empty ground and then log it as found? A waymark at a sculpture, where the sculpture is gone but moved to some other part of the park (I've seen these moved anywhere from a couple hundred feet to a mile away). Log a picture of the empty site and then also log a picture of where the sculpture is at the new location? Also add gps coordinates of the new spot and the log as found? A waymark about a boat ramp where the logging requirements say post a picture of you with your GPS and your boat. This park doesn't have a boat ramp and the closest car access is a mile away. I'm really not sure what to do at this one but will just skip it unless I can get a boat out there since the WMO seems pretty specific about having a boat. A waymark about a car show where the owner says you can only post a visit during the Easter holiday when the specific car show is happening. Will skip this one unless I can make it to the show. A waymark about sledding or fireworks at a location. Can you log a find/visit without doing or seeing the assigned activity at this location? (Btw, I have actually done both requirements but I was not officially Waymarking when I was sledding or watching the fireworks at that spot). The tricky part here, is the waymark page just says post a photo from the location. A waymark at a fallout shelter which is located inside police headquarters. The waymark page only shows the outside of the building but the description question mentions requiring a picture "inside." Honestly it seems like a really bad idea to go inside a police building to take pictures. I took a picture of the fallout shelter sign outside the building, is this qualification enough to count it as found? A waymark at a bar where the bar is totally gone and there is a new business there now. Do I take a picture of the new business and log as found? I really wish there were more specifics about what counts and what doesn't count as a find. I was searching around the Waymarking website but couldn't find a clear answer. A general faq about logging requirements would be really nice.
  7. The peer review vote for my category is now closed and so I can give clarity to the members who din't recieve a message by me. In order to attract more waymarkers to the vote (and potentially get more yea votes) I asked each of the Dutch waymarkers I know to vote and I also sent messages to the 200 waymarkers with the most waymarks in which I asked them to support my category if they liked it. This message was not sent to the members that stated that they were going to vote nay. It was a rogue action, totally unrelated to the group of Spanish waymarkers with the Giant letters. It is lobbying, I admit it, but everyone was free to vote. If I am the one who introduced this I'm surprised it took so long.
  8. I was about to post that myself. 6859 + 200 lab caches (which won't show up in the My Finds PQ) = 7059
  9. It does not include your 200 adventure labs? Just a guess.
  10. Sure, if you mean a particular smartphone. My iphone 8 can be 200 feet off and may "average" down to a really super amazingly average point that far off. It was almost that far off while I was caching yesterday. Fortunately I also had my Garmin. So "a" smartphone is other phones besides mine. Look at the threads about this issue and it applies to many more than mine. Sure, they all can average the error. And it may be a combination of App and Phone (and even the SIM card, based on the threads). And when you're all done, averaging produces an average. Go figure. I also think that adding "averaging" to The Official App would open a whole can of worms for cache hunters and hiders.
  11. Well, I guess I'lll throw a few goals for next year here for now, and edit things accordingly. I'm scaling back my goals fro prior years, not that they were hard or anything, but just because I'm not exactly interesting in going to X, Y and Z if work slows down and I have less money to spend on travelling in my area. That being said, next year, => I'm intending on finding a cache in another state (New York), and also grabbing my first webcam there. => I'll try and host an event or two, one of which hopefully will be on a hill. => Continue streamlining my "cache" load. Basically I intend on continue archiving hides either removed due to local construction (I have 5 listings that have to be removed for a subway being built!) or due to no longer being a good hiding spot. EDIT: I just realized one of my goals in 2020 was to find a webcam cache...huh, that'll be good to get done next year then. EDIT 2, December 26th: Added one more goal. I'm not adding a find based goal, to me thats irrelevant, especially since I intend on geocaching less next year. Earning nearly 200 finds this year was a surprise to put it lightly.
  12. clickable link no, but links in text yes; shortlinks are best, or just short urls, easy to remember and re-type. Don't copy/paste some long 200 character article url with id numbers and all that
  13. Wow, this is a sad update. I have personally spent hundreds of hours researching and finding over 200 benchmarks. I like the activity so much that I have one of my GPS units loaded and designated just for finding benchmarks. While finding benchmarks I have experienced meteor craters, beautiful open deserts, breath-taking mountain tops, secluded water falls and hidden rain forests - all places where placing a Geocache would not be appropriate and didn’t exist. It’s been a shame watching this part of Geocaching being neglected as the years have gone by. I would have loved benchmarking to be grown and maintained by Geocaching COs on the site in some way. I have always wondered why COs couldn’t adopt benchmarks and maintain the listings to keep them in play? Similar to Earthcaching, why not allow the benchmarking community to unite to maintain them like Earthcaches? To see the benchmarking challenges being archived is beyond sad for all of us that enjoy doing them. While on hikes up various mountains for numerous challenges, I have really enjoyed sharing benchmarks to new cachers and muggles. People like hearing about them and some have taken up Geocaching for just that reason. I will mourn the days where we can share the history of surveying to local scouts and then take them to a variety of benchmarks on mountains and desert areas nearby. I’m not sure what harm it does to leave them in our stats or why there is a move to remove the challenges associated with them. As a premium member, I can’t remember being surveyed or asked about a move in this direction. I’m thankful for the ping from another cacher concerning this specific update. If this is around the cost of ownership of the data or database size costs are an issue, maybe offer benchmarking as an add-on option to our memberships. So many of us have great ideas. Please re-think this update. Offer premium benchmarking members alternate options vs removing the fun options that exist today.
  14. Hi Guys and Girls l'm new here but i need some help from here and maybe from some dutch people. what is the correct settings for the magellan triton 200 for Holland. i tried different settings for "mapdate"and "degrees settings" but still my geocache coordinates are way of. i stand on top of one geocache that i know it's there,but still it send my into a different place.
  15. Your search URL searches for caches in the state of Utrecht. The three missing caches are listed in other regions than Utrecht. use this instead: https://www.geocaching.com/play/results/?st=city+of+utrecht%2C+netherlands&oid=-1&ot=query&r=200&hf=1&nfb=ardila.nl&nfb=HHL&ho=1&att=52&asc=true&sort=distance
  16. Is there still something broken in the search system? I wanted to look for night caches so I picked "Utrecht, Netherlands" for it's central location with a 200km circle and the night cache attribute: https://www.geocaching.com/play/results/?st=Utrecht%2C+Netherlands&oid=388&ot=region&r=200&hf=1&nfb=ardila.nl&att=52&asc=true&sort=distance It only finds 4 caches but I would expect it to find these for example: https://coord.info/GC80AGC https://coord.info/GC2HC1F https://coord.info/GC90VR4
  17. I have found a number of benchmarks, and recovered some buried and hidden. They were treasure hunts. However, as a player I know that it does not warrant work when no one is using it, there is no owner to check logs, and it is decades out of date. I do not know this for sure, as I have heard no discussions, but eventually you have to put work into it or it breaks as you update the rest of the site. Your coding is decades out of date and will require a major overhaul. And it is for the 75 people that used it in a summer month to log 200 of them. One of those people was myself, finding a half dozen. Sad to see, but I could see it coming years ago, just sad we finally got there.
  18. there are two brothers who have set out 200 caches between the two. we have started turning the one gone in for NA because they are gone. me and another cacher have been replacing the missing ones and repairing the flat out busted ones. exactly how do you nicely ask them to take care of all their own caches from now on out or they will be turned in for NA if they are missing and if they don't want to do the up keep on them?
  19. My advice is to fix it. Buying something newer will only disappoint you. All devices will have their weaknesses, but the older ones were not built to break to the same degree. I'm using a Garmin Nüvi 200, the single most durable piece of electronics I have ever owned. The amount of punishment it has been subjected to would have destroyed anything else. It has one flaw, the USB connector (used for charging) comes loose after a few years of daily use. When that happened, I bought a second-hand identical replacement unit for $10 and used that until it developed the same problem, then I repaired the original one and have been using it ever since.
  20. It is not uncommon for retirees in Australia to spend months travelling in a caravan or mobile home. One couple I know (through caching - not personally) has been travelling for at least 2 years, caching as they go. I know of people who have taken a year or so to drive right around Australia which is 15,000 Km without detours. GoldenWattle's trip was probably 3 months or so. 6000 Km per month or 200 Km per day. Not so bad
  21. Not to mention it is 200 hours at an average speed of 90 km/h. That's 25 days behind the wheel if you can manage eight hours per day. Not much of a vacation, unless you really love driving.
  22. I won't speculate which window manager operating system you're using, so I won't guess what your "copy and paste" generation actually generated. Generating waypoints en mass is trivial. From the 'teach a man to fish' department. [robertl@rjloud geo]$ i=0 [robertl@rjloud geo]$ while ((i < 250)); do echo 0.$i, 0.$i, $i; ((i++)) ; done | gpsbabel -i csv -f - -o nmea -F - $GPWPL,0000.000,N,00000.000,E,0*7B $GPWPL,0006.000,N,00006.000,E,1*7A $GPWPL,0012.000,N,00012.000,E,2*79 $GPWPL,0018.000,N,00018.000,E,3*78 $GPWPL,0024.000,N,00024.000,E,4*7F $GPWPL,0030.000,N,00030.000,E,5*7E $GPWPL,0036.000,N,00036.000,E,6*7D $GPWPL,0042.000,N,00042.000,E,7*7C $GPWPL,0048.000,N,00048.000,E,8*73 $GPWPL,0054.000,N,00054.000,E,9*72 $GPWPL,0006.000,N,00006.000,E,10*4A $GPWPL,0006.600,N,00006.600,E,11*4B $GPWPL,0007.200,N,00007.200,E,12*48 $GPWPL,0007.800,N,00007.800,E,13*49 $GPWPL,0008.400,N,00008.400,E,14*4E $GPWPL,0009.000,N,00009.000,E,15*4F $GPWPL,0009.600,N,00009.600,E,16*4C $GPWPL,0010.200,N,00010.200,E,17*4D $GPWPL,0010.800,N,00010.800,E,18*42 $GPWPL,0011.400,N,00011.400,E,19*43 $GPWPL,0012.000,N,00012.000,E,20*49 $GPWPL,0012.600,N,00012.600,E,21*48 $GPWPL,0013.200,N,00013.200,E,22*4B $GPWPL,0013.800,N,00013.800,E,23*4A $GPWPL,0014.400,N,00014.400,E,24*4D $GPWPL,0015.000,N,00015.000,E,25*4C $GPWPL,0015.600,N,00015.600,E,26*4F $GPWPL,0016.200,N,00016.200,E,27*4E $GPWPL,0016.800,N,00016.800,E,28*41 $GPWPL,0017.400,N,00017.400,E,29*40 $GPWPL,0018.000,N,00018.000,E,30*48 $GPWPL,0018.600,N,00018.600,E,31*49 $GPWPL,0019.200,N,00019.200,E,32*4A $GPWPL,0019.800,N,00019.800,E,33*4B $GPWPL,0020.400,N,00020.400,E,34*4C $GPWPL,0021.000,N,00021.000,E,35*4D $GPWPL,0021.600,N,00021.600,E,36*4E $GPWPL,0022.200,N,00022.200,E,37*4F $GPWPL,0022.800,N,00022.800,E,38*40 $GPWPL,0023.400,N,00023.400,E,39*41 $GPWPL,0024.000,N,00024.000,E,40*4F $GPWPL,0024.600,N,00024.600,E,41*4E $GPWPL,0025.200,N,00025.200,E,42*4D $GPWPL,0025.800,N,00025.800,E,43*4C $GPWPL,0026.400,N,00026.400,E,44*4B $GPWPL,0027.000,N,00027.000,E,45*4A $GPWPL,0027.600,N,00027.600,E,46*49 $GPWPL,0028.200,N,00028.200,E,47*48 $GPWPL,0028.800,N,00028.800,E,48*47 $GPWPL,0029.400,N,00029.400,E,49*46 $GPWPL,0030.000,N,00030.000,E,50*4E $GPWPL,0030.600,N,00030.600,E,51*4F $GPWPL,0031.200,N,00031.200,E,52*4C $GPWPL,0031.800,N,00031.800,E,53*4D $GPWPL,0032.400,N,00032.400,E,54*4A $GPWPL,0033.000,N,00033.000,E,55*4B $GPWPL,0033.600,N,00033.600,E,56*48 $GPWPL,0034.200,N,00034.200,E,57*49 $GPWPL,0034.800,N,00034.800,E,58*46 $GPWPL,0035.400,N,00035.400,E,59*47 $GPWPL,0036.000,N,00036.000,E,60*4D $GPWPL,0036.600,N,00036.600,E,61*4C $GPWPL,0037.200,N,00037.200,E,62*4F $GPWPL,0037.800,N,00037.800,E,63*4E $GPWPL,0038.400,N,00038.400,E,64*49 $GPWPL,0039.000,N,00039.000,E,65*48 $GPWPL,0039.600,N,00039.600,E,66*4B $GPWPL,0040.200,N,00040.200,E,67*4A $GPWPL,0040.800,N,00040.800,E,68*45 $GPWPL,0041.400,N,00041.400,E,69*44 $GPWPL,0042.000,N,00042.000,E,70*4C $GPWPL,0042.600,N,00042.600,E,71*4D $GPWPL,0043.200,N,00043.200,E,72*4E $GPWPL,0043.800,N,00043.800,E,73*4F $GPWPL,0044.400,N,00044.400,E,74*48 $GPWPL,0045.000,N,00045.000,E,75*49 $GPWPL,0045.600,N,00045.600,E,76*4A $GPWPL,0046.200,N,00046.200,E,77*4B $GPWPL,0046.800,N,00046.800,E,78*44 $GPWPL,0047.400,N,00047.400,E,79*45 $GPWPL,0048.000,N,00048.000,E,80*43 $GPWPL,0048.600,N,00048.600,E,81*42 $GPWPL,0049.200,N,00049.200,E,82*41 $GPWPL,0049.800,N,00049.800,E,83*40 $GPWPL,0050.400,N,00050.400,E,84*47 $GPWPL,0051.000,N,00051.000,E,85*46 $GPWPL,0051.600,N,00051.600,E,86*45 $GPWPL,0052.200,N,00052.200,E,87*44 $GPWPL,0052.800,N,00052.800,E,88*4B $GPWPL,0053.400,N,00053.400,E,89*4A $GPWPL,0054.000,N,00054.000,E,90*42 $GPWPL,0054.600,N,00054.600,E,91*43 $GPWPL,0055.200,N,00055.200,E,92*40 $GPWPL,0055.800,N,00055.800,E,93*41 $GPWPL,0056.400,N,00056.400,E,94*46 $GPWPL,0057.000,N,00057.000,E,95*47 $GPWPL,0057.600,N,00057.600,E,96*44 $GPWPL,0058.200,N,00058.200,E,97*45 $GPWPL,0058.800,N,00058.800,E,98*4A $GPWPL,0059.400,N,00059.400,E,99*4B $GPWPL,0006.000,N,00006.000,E,100*7A $GPWPL,0006.060,N,00006.060,E,101*7B $GPWPL,0006.120,N,00006.120,E,102*78 $GPWPL,0006.180,N,00006.180,E,103*79 $GPWPL,0006.240,N,00006.240,E,104*7E $GPWPL,0006.300,N,00006.300,E,105*7F $GPWPL,0006.360,N,00006.360,E,106*7C $GPWPL,0006.420,N,00006.420,E,107*7D $GPWPL,0006.480,N,00006.480,E,108*72 $GPWPL,0006.540,N,00006.540,E,109*73 $GPWPL,0006.600,N,00006.600,E,110*7B $GPWPL,0006.660,N,00006.660,E,111*7A $GPWPL,0006.720,N,00006.720,E,112*79 $GPWPL,0006.780,N,00006.780,E,113*78 $GPWPL,0006.840,N,00006.840,E,114*7F $GPWPL,0006.900,N,00006.900,E,115*7E $GPWPL,0006.960,N,00006.960,E,116*7D $GPWPL,0007.020,N,00007.020,E,117*7C $GPWPL,0007.080,N,00007.080,E,118*73 $GPWPL,0007.140,N,00007.140,E,119*72 $GPWPL,0007.200,N,00007.200,E,120*78 $GPWPL,0007.260,N,00007.260,E,121*79 $GPWPL,0007.320,N,00007.320,E,122*7A $GPWPL,0007.380,N,00007.380,E,123*7B $GPWPL,0007.440,N,00007.440,E,124*7C $GPWPL,0007.500,N,00007.500,E,125*7D $GPWPL,0007.560,N,00007.560,E,126*7E $GPWPL,0007.620,N,00007.620,E,127*7F $GPWPL,0007.680,N,00007.680,E,128*70 $GPWPL,0007.740,N,00007.740,E,129*71 $GPWPL,0007.800,N,00007.800,E,130*79 $GPWPL,0007.860,N,00007.860,E,131*78 $GPWPL,0007.920,N,00007.920,E,132*7B $GPWPL,0007.980,N,00007.980,E,133*7A $GPWPL,0008.040,N,00008.040,E,134*7D $GPWPL,0008.100,N,00008.100,E,135*7C $GPWPL,0008.160,N,00008.160,E,136*7F $GPWPL,0008.220,N,00008.220,E,137*7E $GPWPL,0008.280,N,00008.280,E,138*71 $GPWPL,0008.340,N,00008.340,E,139*70 $GPWPL,0008.400,N,00008.400,E,140*7E $GPWPL,0008.460,N,00008.460,E,141*7F $GPWPL,0008.520,N,00008.520,E,142*7C $GPWPL,0008.580,N,00008.580,E,143*7D $GPWPL,0008.640,N,00008.640,E,144*7A $GPWPL,0008.700,N,00008.700,E,145*7B $GPWPL,0008.760,N,00008.760,E,146*78 $GPWPL,0008.820,N,00008.820,E,147*79 $GPWPL,0008.880,N,00008.880,E,148*76 $GPWPL,0008.940,N,00008.940,E,149*77 $GPWPL,0009.000,N,00009.000,E,150*7F $GPWPL,0009.060,N,00009.060,E,151*7E $GPWPL,0009.120,N,00009.120,E,152*7D $GPWPL,0009.180,N,00009.180,E,153*7C $GPWPL,0009.240,N,00009.240,E,154*7B $GPWPL,0009.300,N,00009.300,E,155*7A $GPWPL,0009.360,N,00009.360,E,156*79 $GPWPL,0009.420,N,00009.420,E,157*78 $GPWPL,0009.480,N,00009.480,E,158*77 $GPWPL,0009.540,N,00009.540,E,159*76 $GPWPL,0009.600,N,00009.600,E,160*7C $GPWPL,0009.660,N,00009.660,E,161*7D $GPWPL,0009.720,N,00009.720,E,162*7E $GPWPL,0009.780,N,00009.780,E,163*7F $GPWPL,0009.840,N,00009.840,E,164*78 $GPWPL,0009.900,N,00009.900,E,165*79 $GPWPL,0009.960,N,00009.960,E,166*7A $GPWPL,0010.020,N,00010.020,E,167*7B $GPWPL,0010.080,N,00010.080,E,168*74 $GPWPL,0010.140,N,00010.140,E,169*75 $GPWPL,0010.200,N,00010.200,E,170*7D $GPWPL,0010.260,N,00010.260,E,171*7C $GPWPL,0010.320,N,00010.320,E,172*7F $GPWPL,0010.380,N,00010.380,E,173*7E $GPWPL,0010.440,N,00010.440,E,174*79 $GPWPL,0010.500,N,00010.500,E,175*78 $GPWPL,0010.560,N,00010.560,E,176*7B $GPWPL,0010.620,N,00010.620,E,177*7A $GPWPL,0010.680,N,00010.680,E,178*75 $GPWPL,0010.740,N,00010.740,E,179*74 $GPWPL,0010.800,N,00010.800,E,180*72 $GPWPL,0010.860,N,00010.860,E,181*73 $GPWPL,0010.920,N,00010.920,E,182*70 $GPWPL,0010.980,N,00010.980,E,183*71 $GPWPL,0011.040,N,00011.040,E,184*76 $GPWPL,0011.100,N,00011.100,E,185*77 $GPWPL,0011.160,N,00011.160,E,186*74 $GPWPL,0011.220,N,00011.220,E,187*75 $GPWPL,0011.280,N,00011.280,E,188*7A $GPWPL,0011.340,N,00011.340,E,189*7B $GPWPL,0011.400,N,00011.400,E,190*73 $GPWPL,0011.460,N,00011.460,E,191*72 $GPWPL,0011.520,N,00011.520,E,192*71 $GPWPL,0011.580,N,00011.580,E,193*70 $GPWPL,0011.640,N,00011.640,E,194*77 $GPWPL,0011.700,N,00011.700,E,195*76 $GPWPL,0011.760,N,00011.760,E,196*75 $GPWPL,0011.820,N,00011.820,E,197*74 $GPWPL,0011.880,N,00011.880,E,198*7B $GPWPL,0011.940,N,00011.940,E,199*7A $GPWPL,0012.000,N,00012.000,E,200*79 $GPWPL,0012.060,N,00012.060,E,201*78 $GPWPL,0012.120,N,00012.120,E,202*7B $GPWPL,0012.180,N,00012.180,E,203*7A $GPWPL,0012.240,N,00012.240,E,204*7D $GPWPL,0012.300,N,00012.300,E,205*7C $GPWPL,0012.360,N,00012.360,E,206*7F $GPWPL,0012.420,N,00012.420,E,207*7E $GPWPL,0012.480,N,00012.480,E,208*71 $GPWPL,0012.540,N,00012.540,E,209*70 $GPWPL,0012.600,N,00012.600,E,210*78 $GPWPL,0012.660,N,00012.660,E,211*79 $GPWPL,0012.720,N,00012.720,E,212*7A $GPWPL,0012.780,N,00012.780,E,213*7B $GPWPL,0012.840,N,00012.840,E,214*7C $GPWPL,0012.900,N,00012.900,E,215*7D $GPWPL,0012.960,N,00012.960,E,216*7E $GPWPL,0013.020,N,00013.020,E,217*7F $GPWPL,0013.080,N,00013.080,E,218*70 $GPWPL,0013.140,N,00013.140,E,219*71 $GPWPL,0013.200,N,00013.200,E,220*7B $GPWPL,0013.260,N,00013.260,E,221*7A $GPWPL,0013.320,N,00013.320,E,222*79 $GPWPL,0013.380,N,00013.380,E,223*78 $GPWPL,0013.440,N,00013.440,E,224*7F $GPWPL,0013.500,N,00013.500,E,225*7E $GPWPL,0013.560,N,00013.560,E,226*7D $GPWPL,0013.620,N,00013.620,E,227*7C $GPWPL,0013.680,N,00013.680,E,228*73 $GPWPL,0013.740,N,00013.740,E,229*72 $GPWPL,0013.800,N,00013.800,E,230*7A $GPWPL,0013.860,N,00013.860,E,231*7B $GPWPL,0013.920,N,00013.920,E,232*78 $GPWPL,0013.980,N,00013.980,E,233*79 $GPWPL,0014.040,N,00014.040,E,234*7E $GPWPL,0014.100,N,00014.100,E,235*7F $GPWPL,0014.160,N,00014.160,E,236*7C $GPWPL,0014.220,N,00014.220,E,237*7D $GPWPL,0014.280,N,00014.280,E,238*72 $GPWPL,0014.340,N,00014.340,E,239*73 $GPWPL,0014.400,N,00014.400,E,240*7D $GPWPL,0014.460,N,00014.460,E,241*7C $GPWPL,0014.520,N,00014.520,E,242*7F $GPWPL,0014.580,N,00014.580,E,243*7E $GPWPL,0014.640,N,00014.640,E,244*79 $GPWPL,0014.700,N,00014.700,E,245*78 $GPWPL,0014.760,N,00014.760,E,246*7B $GPWPL,0014.820,N,00014.820,E,247*7A $GPWPL,0014.880,N,00014.880,E,248*75 $GPWPL,0014.940,N,00014.940,E,249*74 [robertl@rjloud geo]$ You can use that set of waypoints to determine if the GO's actually do need a delay since they can't generate a handshake.
  23. toczygroszek

    200

    Własnie zauważyłem, że niedawno doszedł nam kolejny geocacher >200 - bogobig. Gratulacje! http://www.cacherstats.com/Poland1_PL.html
  24. It's been like that here for the last four or five years. When I started in 2013, there were between 100 and 200 new caches being published in my region each year but that's now down to a couple of dozen. The spate of natural disasters in recent years hasn't helped either. This region (the NSW Central Coast, Australia) was largely spared from the fires of 2019 but the almost constant rain and flooding since then has taken its toll. I've archived five of my hides so far this year, about half due to rain damage destroying access to the cache, and have another two long-term disabled due to trail closures which will likely end up archived too. Last year there were just 16 new caches in this region, one of which has already been archived. This year's doing a bit better, with 25 new caches so far (1 already archived). I have a new one that's nearly ready to submit, although in visiting the location yesterday I ended up collecting about a dozen leeches so I might have to wait for some drier weather before placing it. The total number of caches in the region is currently 506, down from about 550 a year or two back.
  25. Here is a great example that makes me wonder about the usefulness of this 'feature'..... the information in the hidden posts was about the (large) rock the cache was hidden under being now unstable, and as you were sitting between it and a very high cliff (probably 200'/60m) about 2m/6' away, that care should be taken lest the rock nudge you over the edge should it become free.... If you must (I really don't get it though), hide the users (anonymous?) name, but why censor out the info? This info may actually be important..... And of course it wasn't unobtainable in any case, as the user's name and info was quite easily gathered from the official app.....
×
×
  • Create New...