Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for '������ ���������,���������������katalk:ZA31���200%������ ��������� ������ ������������'.

  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Geocaching HQ Communications
    • Announcements
    • Release Notes
    • User Insights
  • General Geocaching Discussions
    • Getting Started
    • How Do I...?
    • Geocaching Topics
    • Geocache Types and Additional GPS Based Gameplay
  • Adventure Lab® Discussions
    • Play Adventure Lab®
    • Create an Adventure Lab®
  • Community
    • Geocaching Discussions by Country
  • Trackables
    • Travel Bugs
    • Geocoins
  • Bug Reports and Feature Discussions
    • Website
    • Geocaching® iPhone App
    • Geocaching® Android App
  • Geocaching and...
    • GPS/API/Technology
    • Education
    • Hiking/Backpacking
    • Photography
    • Design

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start




  1. https://www.geocaching.com/blog/2021/03/new-souvenir-challenge-the-science-of-discovery/ It’s 21 years into the 21st century and geocachers continue to be experts in the science of discovery. Recently, geocaching innovators have experimented in the Adventure Lab® to create new experiences. From interactive food tours to local trivia, cachers are formulating Adventures in new ways. Let’s combine geocaching with Adventure Lab to create the perfect solution for discovery. April 12 through July 11, find Adventure Lab Caches and other geocache types to earn up to four scien-terrifi
  2. I live in a pretty cache dense area - and yet, over the past year and a half several new cachers have appeared, and a few have hidden several new caches. There are still lots of spots available - and not all cachers even WANT to hide and maintain caches of their own. Those that do enjoy hiding are able to find spots. Yes, we do have a few "prolific" hiders, but not all that many, and they. by no means, take EVERY available spot. There's lots of room for those who want to place a cache. I very much doubt that limiting each cacher to a specific # of hides will "throw open the game to more p
  3. Mausebiber


    Keiner macht Spaß mit einer schlimmen Krankheit, die Frage ist aber, wie gehen wir damit um? Wie viele (in Prozent) der Infizierten leiden denn unter long-Covid? Hier einige Infos dazu, allerdings werden Zahlen zu den tatsächlich Betroffenen nicht genannt: https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/125635/Long-COVID-Patienten-klagen-ueber-mehr-als-200-verschiedene-Symptome Wir alle sind, so glaube ich zumindest, Geocacher. Gehen wir auch weiterhin in den Wald und durchstreifen Wiesen, obwohl wir genau wissen, wie gefährlich Borreliose ist? Müssten wir denn nicht zu hause b
  4. And I will be the first to agree, BUT it was certainly time well spent. Lee, that must have taken much more time than I have EVER SPENT on a single Waymark, save for one notable one (notable only to me because of how much time it took to bring to fruition). So, you get a heap of kudos from me for all the time and effort you have obviously put forth to create that map. I've already bookmarked it. BUT, as time passes, people will tend to move about, thereby somewhat muddying the waters, even yours. I see at least one (lemme go back and peek at the map one more time)... ..
  5. Doesn't the % FPs say more? 8 FPs on a hide with 200 finds is not as convincing as 8 FPs on a cache with 10 finds.
  6. Does this count as user-configurable? (If you Inspect Element, change the "value" of one of the <option>s to 200, ensure that the modified <option> is selected, and then press "Go", the change is persistent across refreshes.) (I suspect that this might get fixed soon, now that I've pointed it out.) (Oops) (Hopefully they add an "proper" option to the settings.)
  7. I just returned from a fantastic trip to Iceland, involving active volcano watching, glorious sunshine and fantastic landscapes, and dense, superwet fog. Fab caching overall. I can't upload photos because this *kitten* system doesn't tell me how small the images have to be, or whatever else is wrong other than throwing a -200 error at me. thus here a link: https://imgur.com/a/oLuDHjS
  8. I also spend quite a long time on developing, testing and building the caches. For most of the more difficult ideas I also try to get someone testing it. The most extreme cache to date is GC8YEYQ, an online mystery with a dedicated website. It has 22 questions and puzzles to be solved embedded in a story of a young woman losing her memory. The outdoor part is "just" a 2 stage multi with a really big box and some surprises. The time spend on this is really hard to estimate, but even before the publish it was far more than 200 hours for me alone developing the software, sel
  9. Yes, there are something like 4000 caches in the Sydney region, of which I've found a bit over 200, but I really don't like driving in Sydney - if the traffic isn't bad enough, a few decades of "urban consolidation" means parking is almost impossible to find once you get where you're going - so most of my Sydney caching has been by public transport, either on the train or the Broken Bay ferry. COVID has also added another perspective, particularly after I narrowly avoided being caught up in the Northern Beaches lockdown just before Christmas, having visited the area just a week before it all s
  10. 100 miles is not enough; too bad you can't increase that. That's why I liked the "old" search; you could get into the URL and up the distance to 200 miles (or whatever), which gives me Wichita and the DFW area (from OKC).
  11. Separated by miles? They are everywhere! The closest ones here have starts 200 meters apart, and these two are 300-400 meters from the planned Mega! BTW, "separated by miles" doesn't sound very far apart. Add a bunch of stages to that.
  12. Kann ich für meine Familie zumindest nicht bestätigen. Meine Kinder wandern durchaus gerne, was sie aber extrem nervt ist wenn man alle 161 (oder 200 oder 300) m stehen bleibt um eine Dose zu suchen. Mit dem Ergebnis, dass ich solche "Runden" alleine machen muss.
  13. Nöh, das halte ich nicht für merkwürdig. Eher für ein wenig einseitig formuliert. Der Pfeil und das Nachlaufen wird ja mit nem Ziel, an dem es was zu sehen und/oder einem anderen Mehrwert dabei hat nicht schlechter - sondern besser. Und natürlich ist der schöne Weg ja auch schon mehr als "Pfeil nachlaufen und Döschen entdecken". Wenn man sich da aber alle 200 Meter bücken muss und dann zuhause 50 Logs schreiben, sind da ziemlich viel unnötige Begleiterscheinungen dabei - und so sehen Dosen und Logs eben auch aus - reduziert. Der Weg bzw. das Führen der Leute darüber erf
  14. Finally after many years, King Pellinore breaks the 200 caches found barrier. He found his first cache in 08/25/2001 and quickly became one of NJ's top cachers. Petering out at the end of 2006, his long hiatus (until 2019) was broken by a single find in 2013 of https://www.geocaching.com/geocache/GC3A1QK_block-head He has been getting around a bit, adding states to his geocaching collection. Who knows, he might even place another cache!
  15. Same Problem I also reported to GSAK's Forum as I hate having to baby sit the refresh cache data. I get the same message as above but I'll post the verbose log here. When the retry box comes up it only displays fail. Generating GPX file HttpRequestBegin: POST,api.Groundspeak.com:443/LiveV6/Geocaching.svc/SearchForGeocaches RequestHeader: POST /LiveV6/Geocaching.svc/SearchForGeocaches HTTP/1.1 StartSendingRequest: 3793 PercentDone: 100 HttpInfo: Begin reading response ... no response after 20 seconds ResponseHeader: HTTP/1.1 200 OK HttpStatusCode: 200 ResponseContentLength: 1315120
  16. Hello everyone, Years ago I used to cache a lot. I had a 60 series Garmin with a color screen. I lent it to a friend and got destroyed! Oops. Oh well. Reparations were made in the form of concert tickets at the time lol. My typical adventure would mean finding an interesting spot on Google Maps/Earth, mark the coordinates, upload them to the GPS along with any caches, and go exploring. I use GSAK at the time, and I remember doing something with KML files but don't recall what now lol. It's been a decade and I'd like to get back into caching/hiking/exploring. I live in
  17. What is the game coming to? This premium member joined almost a year ago and has made over 200 finds but has never visited the website and clearly has no idea that there's such a thing as a Needs Maintenance log, or if they do they can't figure out how to log one on the app.
  18. Recently I was caching with a friend an we found a cache that was quite nice, but not really worth a full favourite. We said to each other: Wouldn't it be nice to be able to award millifavourites. So my request to split up favourites in to one thousand millifavourites (mFav). This will give us the possibility to give 1/2 (500 mFav), 1/3 (333 mFav), 1/4 (250 mFav), 1/5 (200 mFav) 1/6 (167mFav) etc. favourites. Tc
  19. Ein echter Cacher ist der, der das alles so sieht - und tut - wie ich. Nöh, natürlich Quatsch, sorry. Eigentlich kann ich da ja jetzt nur verlieren - selbst wenn ich das irgendwie mit sprachlichen Mitteln einigermassen in die Reihe kriege, kann man da natürlich immer bei irgendeinem Begriff, Redewendung o.ä. "ja, aber......" sagen. Aber ich versuchs mal Zuallererst muss man - um eventuellen Missverständnissen zuvorzukommen - wohl beschreiben, was das NICHT ist. Es zielt da nicht auf Cachearten ("Mysterys/Multis/Tradis sind grundsätzlich doof"), auch nich
  20. Well I installed the app today. Did a first adventure lab nearby. And then found out that this totally screwed up my Geocache-Score. Gladly found out how to delete the adventure lab logs. How dumb is it, to score 5 points for one (!) adventure? This AL I did, was nice and easy. Maybe 200 metres for all 5 stations... Now I need to decide, to give the app another try with a different or new account or to wait and see, until this bug is corrected and fixed. But seeing my real geocaching-score getting screwed up big time was really annoying.
  21. Circled and circled for 20 minutes. Could not find it. Great story Helpful View Log No Finder 1 Premium Member 5383 Didn't find it 04/14/2021 No find. No trackable either that a previous cacher said they left. There's nothing even close by like the description. Gone. 7 DNF in a row for a 1.5/1.5 cache. Needs to be archived if the CO does not co
  22. No! No! No! No! No! Those devices are ancient. They require special cables. They aren't inherently geocaching compatible. And they don't really give you a taste of how modern GPS units function. If you are going to take the legacy route, go no farther back than the oldest models that support USB mass storage mode, gpx file support, and paperless geocaching. The eTrex 20/30, the Oregon 200/300, the (defunct) Colorado series, or the gpsMap62. Those are the oldest models we should be recommending to new users looking to save on a GPS. Anything else is like recommending your grandparents bu
  23. Height and Width attributes (but nor for example Advisory title) are lost when reediting a TB page. Recreate by this flow. Attaching some images for this recreation flow, steps marked with *). - Go to a TB page with an image in its description - Edit the TB page - Right click and image in the description and select Image Properties - Set width and/or height, (for example Height: 200) *) - "OK" to accept changes to image - "Submit Changes" to save the TB page edits - "Visit the Trackables Page" to view the changes. (Images has height 200) *) - Edit t
  24. I am member of a geocaching telegram group where other members were discussing this new "trend" only recently. I couldn't imagine why owners would have to create such an ALC until exactly one of those was released in my area (Central Germany) a few days ago. The first stage is 35 km away from me, the next one is located 200 km north. One is 300 km further west, one is in the Netherlands and one on a tiny island in the ocean near Montenegro! I asked the owner what his intention is and whether players would have to travel to all of these places. His answer was: "You don't have to. No
  25. Die Meinung darf er auch haben, OHNE irgendeinen Cache gefunden zu haben. Die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass seine Meinung wirklich als gewichtig empfunden wird, ist halt grösser, wenn er das als wirklich erfahrener Aktiver "aus dem Spiel" heraus macht. Ich unterstelle mal :), dass HHL das meinte. Das ist eben nicht dasselbe. Wobei so am Rande - jedesmal, wenn ich mit nem völlig cachefernen Muggel so übers Cachen ins Erzählen komme, kommt der mit "ha, dann könnte man doch......" und da sind dann immer bessere und gehaltvollere Ideen dabei als vieles, was da draussen so rumli
  • Create New...