MissAmerica1

No I still cant activate mine

I would love to trade to get as many color combo's as were made! Anyone wanna trade?

I cant activate mine either!

Can I get 6 please? Excellent idea

These are so pretty I want some too

I LOVE MY SPOT please dont change me!

I got 4 oakbucks today and thought to myself that these might be marketing tools to get me to purchase more geocoins! How cool we can use these at events they are at! Guess I will hold onto them for GEO-Woodstock! Wooo hooooooo

Hay Patty

Patty Horse

Patty May

Patty La bell

Patty Dukes

Peppermint Patty and The Fonz

Blue berry

I guess 22.2 F

Mission 1. Participating:Yes 2. Received Name: Yes 3. Mission Complete: Sent today 4. Santa Arrived:Yesterday I love my coins THANK YOU SO MUCH SECRET SANTA

Mission 1. Participating: YES 2. Name Received: YES 12/4 3. Mission Complete: Sending out in 2 days 4. Packaged Received: soon, I hope!

Can you add me too? Miss America1

Ok ok Lemme think here Born December 22 Length 20 inches Weight 7 pounds 7 ounces

Apparently so. Rules according to who? The GC guidelines do NOT clearly state you must be present for a virtual to log it. One might interpret this, which is fine. However, their are MANY virtual cache owners who seem to read the guidelines differently. Thus, allow google finds and even have taken it to the point that you can NOT log the cache by traveling to the coords. These caches were grandfathered in which means when they were approved as caches, it was ok for one to find the cache this way. How is it now not acceptable to log this find??? I mean seriously it seems as the thread owner is being singled out for what is considered to some as appropriate. Yes some dislike the thought of an internet find and are free to feel as such. But for those virtual cache owners who like people to do the research online and then submit info to them, those should also be considered a rightful find. Its the individual owner of the cache to decide how to run their cache!!!

Yes. If that is what the cache owner wants, then yes. Not all caches are easy. Some people would love that cache. My bet is that it is logged regularly. If you consider 12 times only this year so far regularly then ok. I think that speaks for itself!

I personally have read about hundreds of caches, that literally state, you dont have to be present to log this cache! Alot of those caches require you to do research on the web to answer question you wont find at the site....One example is the California 9-11 (where you are asked to look up a name on the internet to find info about that person) Another one you are asked to watch some webcams until you find a certain type of car and then save that as a picture to post as your proof to log..........neither of those can be done by traveling to the posted coords!

You have a legit complaint. I have ran across countless virtual log entries that simply say "Thanks for the internet find." Are they asking all of the people on GC to delete all of those logs? In regards to your other side of the argument.....Last night my family (well 3/4th of it) went to Knotts Berry Farm for a special school event for my youngest child. Knotts is only 3 miles from my house and there is a virtual cache there that I would LOVE to get off my list, but they want you to visit 12 different places inside this amusement park and answer a question to each of the legs of this multi. I am expected to pay high-dollar to enter this park and then spend the next few hours looking for these places??? A picture with Snoopy or in front of the Log Ride would have been so much simpler, but not allowed. I did not log this cache nor will I ever, because its beyond rediculous. You will find MANY bookmarked lists of Couch Potato/Internet Finds/Computer Caches/Google Caches/Rainy-Day finds/Dont have to leave your house to log this find, type of caches attached to alot of the virtuals out there. I would think as long as you have provided the info that the cache owner is asking for and they give you permission to log, all should be perfectly fine to mark as a find!

You mean libel right ( or the more generic "defame" )? I'm jus' sayin' Well if we wanna go as far as to say LIBEL surely, its the most severe of the two. We are all entitled to our own opinions it is when you print it in public form without factual basis that may harm the reputation of an individual, business, or product, etc.. that is becomes defamation. How it is expressed is the defination between the two.