Jump to content

TheWonderStuff

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    113
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TheWonderStuff

  1. I understand. But the geocaching rules specifically state that the cache should not be logged until it is ready to be hunted. So if I follow the rules, I have to find the location, plan and make the cache, hide it, and then wait and find out if there are other, incomplete caches in that area. I understand that puzzle caches need some time to make (which is what I ran into) and you don;t want someone planning one and have their location snapped up, but the rest of us need some warning that the area is claimed before we hide the physical cache, as some are heavy! And if we log it before we hide the cache, we violate the rules posted on the Website! I just don;t know how to stop this from happening again.

     

    BTW, the other cacher, "shmair", has contacted me and graciously moved the eventual location of his puzzle cache to allow ours to be listed, so we will just wait for the all clear sign from the reviewer.

     

    Also, this is not ment to be a slam at a particular reviewer (that is why I did not use their username). I just wanted some help on an appropriate course of action, as we are relative noobies.

     

    I sometimes send my reviewer gps cords of a GZ I have in mind before setting up my cache to be sure Im far enough away from any other caches ( pesky puzzles), and it saves the frustration that you are facing at the moment :laughing:

     

    I suggest you keep this in mind for future hides you maybe planning :laughing:

  2.  

    Who should be allowed to develop earthcaches? Those with a background in the earth sciences or just simply everyone?

     

    What Level of background of earth science do you think should be acceptable? a degree? Masters?

     

    Or just someone who watches the National Geo channel once in awhile?

     

    I think you need to remember geocaching is just a game. Also, if geoaware publishes them, then one would presume they cut the mustard? ;)

  3. New Software update for the Garmin Colorados;

     

    http://www8.garmin.com/support/download_details.jsp?id=3891

     

    Changes made from version 2.51 to 2.54:

    Added ability to turn elevation shading off, included in user profile settings

    Added ability to log a comment with geocaching Field Notes

    Added ability to save map selections to user profile settings

    Added compass setting to saved user profile settings

    Added tracback along current track

    Added ability to determine public land survey or USGS Quad name for Topo 24k HD cartography

    Added progress bar during software updates

    Improved odometer distance calculation

    Improved Wherigo engine

    Improved backlight behavior

    Improved compass / gps heading autoswitch behavior

    Improved keyboard behavior in address & intersection searches

    Improved behavior in low battery state

    Improved behavior of turn-by-turn route recalcuations

    Improved map drawing to eliminate redraws when not necessary

    Improved map drawing to reduce partial map draws

    Improved map drawing to enhance appearance of trails

    Improved usability of WGS84 by listing as a datum rather than just a spheroid

    Improved automatic track archiving when archiving very lengthy activity segments

    Increased maximum number of GPX files processed to 200

    Corrected guidance text to not truncate streets when not necessary

    Corrected behavior of proximity alarms in custom points of interest

    Corrected potential issues that prevented user alarm from sounding

    Corrected map drawing above 75 degrees latitude

    Corrected potential issue when attempting to delete profiles

    Corrected issue that generated extra waypoints at poweron when 'Mark Waypoint' was the first listed shortcut

    Corrected potential issue preventing 'Waypoints' from being listed in 'Where to?'

    Corrected issue that prevented poor signal strength messages from disappearing if a fix was achieved

    Corrected calculated issue that prevented complete display of large numbers

    Corrected specified schema path for GPX files

    Corrected Dutch keyboard to include 'Z' for address searches

    Corrected User Grid to retain settings between power cycles

    Corrected User Grid to allow 'E' and 'W' for longitude origin entry

  4. Yep, I had a 60 CSx and pushed all my caches into it with the related icon. On the CO, it is all tied to the GPX file. The icon is coded on the GPX file. I believe all the icons are now correct EXCEPT the EarthCache icon.

     

    Ill hold off on buying one till they fix it ;)

     

    Maybe they will fix it in a firmware upgrade? Keep an eye on the garmin homepage

  5. From your gallery it looks like you are using a 60CSx?

     

    The CO is a different animal, do you know how to load geocaches into the CO with a custom icon?

     

    No, actually I don't. Presumed it would be the same...... but it appears not to be.

     

    :D

  6. This may be a cross post but it didn't get a lot of attention on the other forum.

     

    I actively seek out EarthCaches while traveling. I now have the new Garmin Colorado and the EarthCache icon still appears as the traditional cache icon (green box). I have two issue with this. One, I want to see what caches in a given area are EarthCaches. Two, maybe a little more importantly, is that some searchers may be looking for a traditional cache at an EarthCache location and potentially cause harm to the location.

     

    I've written to Groundspeak but they state it is a Garmin issue. Garmin needs more people to bring it to their attention.

     

    Why dont you do a seperate PQ for Earthcaches and then load them selecting a different icon?

     

    Simple really.

  7. I think (and this is just my opinion) you are opening a pandora's box here. As with normal caches the owner should be able to access the cache, and it seems to me you are cheapening the EarthCache Master level requirements by "trading" Earthcaches.

     

    Also, since GeoAware requires proof of permission obtained by the placer, that placer should remain owner IMO. It would be hard for a cacher from NZ to stay in communication with a permission giver in SA.

     

    I wouldnt go and find a cache that I adopt out - to me thats "cheating".

     

    Also, 3 caches in New Zealand were done by a Canadian, remotely, using the web and google earth..... Top notch EC's to.

     

    Can you post GC codes or links to these NZ EC's?

     

    What would be the point? - also, Im only going on hearsay.

     

    no pressure. I'm curious as to the quality of alleged EC's.

     

    Maybe you could do abit of detective work...... and report back to us? :D

  8.  

    Also, 3 caches in New Zealand were done by a Canadian, remotely, using the web and google earth..... Top notch EC's to.

    I don't know about arm chair listing (or logging) :)

     

    Hence the photo requirement on my earthcaches ;)

  9. I think (and this is just my opinion) you are opening a pandora's box here. As with normal caches the owner should be able to access the cache, and it seems to me you are cheapening the EarthCache Master level requirements by "trading" Earthcaches.

     

    Also, since GeoAware requires proof of permission obtained by the placer, that placer should remain owner IMO. It would be hard for a cacher from NZ to stay in communication with a permission giver in SA.

     

    I wouldnt go and find a cache that I adopt out - to me thats "cheating".

     

    Also, 3 caches in New Zealand were done by a Canadian, remotely, using the web and google earth..... Top notch EC's to.

     

    Can you post GC codes or links to these NZ EC's?

     

    What would be the point? - also, Im only going on hearsay.

  10. I think (and this is just my opinion) you are opening a pandora's box here. As with normal caches the owner should be able to access the cache, and it seems to me you are cheapening the EarthCache Master level requirements by "trading" Earthcaches.

     

    Also, since GeoAware requires proof of permission obtained by the placer, that placer should remain owner IMO. It would be hard for a cacher from NZ to stay in communication with a permission giver in SA.

     

    I wouldnt go and find a cache that I adopt out - to me thats "cheating".

     

    Also, 3 caches in New Zealand were done by a Canadian, remotely, using the web and google earth..... Top notch EC's to.

  11. Well, im rather keen to adopt a USA Earthcahe or 2 off another cacher and/or adopt one of my New Zealand ones out.

     

    Let me know if anyone is keen on either. ;)

     

    This got me thinking.

     

    1) I have a whole series here in South africa, and will be more than willing to share with anyone wanting an African cache.

     

    2) If you let someone adopt one of your caches - can you find it?

     

    1) I have a whole series here in South africa, and will be more than willing to share with anyone wanting an African cache.

     

    Sweet - Im keen....

     

    2) If you let someone adopt one of your caches - can you find it?

     

    I personally wouldnt, but you could.

  12. How does it work here in England? Do different counties apply as states/regions?

     

    I asked almost the same question about 2 months ago by email.

    This is the answer I got:

     

    In Europe, it must be different countries.

    States/provinces count only in the US, Canada, and Australia.

     

    Does this answer your question?

     

    Geoaware

     

    I think that was a straight and clear answer.

     

    GeoBSWEScout

     

    Sweet, I was made to feel I had cheated in my country on recieving my Gold Pin. Music to my ears here ;)

×
×
  • Create New...