I'm a newbie, so my opinion is worthless, but here it is anyway.
If you need to suspend new locationless caches till they can better be handled, fine, but don't start breaking things out into their own categories and names or it will never end.
I agree that benchmarks are a whole different animal and should be handled as such, but I think if we start separating locationless from other cache types, then pretty soon, someone will be wanting to separate virtuals, and multis, and water caches and land caches and caches that are in trees. Why? Who cares? It just adds unneeded complexity. If you don't want to do a locationless, don't. If you don't want to do a virtual, don't. But I think separating them into different categories other that the categories that are there now is just a waste of time. And the 'i wouldn't want to soil my count by logging a locationless'? Please, get a life.
Rainking