I also have to downvote the new "Advanced Search", a name which bears with it a certain amount of irony, as the specification and results in many cases are less flexible than the previous un-advanced on. Kind of like the practice in Congress of calling a bill/act what the writer wants to spin it to rather than what it is...
Enough grousing; specifics:
1. Need to return results from a wider search area (don't limit the number too soon)
2. Need to allow more flexibility in putting in partial cache or user names
3. Not giving cachers the option to use the previous search page/method
4. Not being able to save a particular filter combination (this could be a Premium-only feature)
5. Not being able to find "newest caches X distance from Y". Newest from home used to be on (premium) profile page; I miss it!
There are a couple of filter options that would make its use in the field (as opposed to at a desk) much more helpful:
6. Filter on "Needs Maintenance" attribute (yes, either, no)
7. Filter on "Last Log item is a.." (DNF, Write Note, Owner Maintenance), and allow multiples of those attributes. The "has-corrected-coordinates" option is a step in the right direction.
8. Admittedly this is a Hawaii thing, but would like to search by island within state (not county, these are not 1:1) but for most states a county division would be good
Anyway, I'd chalk most of the complaints up to not having enough field or play-testing but I suspect that most folks tried it during the beta period and didn't like it, then assumed it wouldn't be made the default search without an alternative. That's where I stood, up until this last weekend when I had to use the new search in an actual field situation. Coding PQs in the woods is not as easy as it sounds...
Cache On!
Donn (the D in Team ADmuk)