Jump to content

pmaupin

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    326
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pmaupin

  1. 48 minutes ago, Bear and Ragged said:

    A Waymark gets submitted.

     

    An officer can:

    Accept it.

    Deny it. (With a reason why they decline)

    Put it to the other officers for a vote. (With a reason why it was put to the vote)

     

    All officers get to vote. (A notification is sent out)

    Officers can:

    Accept the Waymark.

    Decline (With a comment)

    Abstain. (With a comment)

     

    There is a 3 day wait for this to complete.  *Is it completed after the majority of officers vote?*

    The 3 day vote is often 'sticky' and may need an officer to log back in to clear it! Seems to be a long standing problem. :unsure:

    It's clear, clean and very precise.

  2. 8 hours ago, ScroogieII said:

    Phil, you just blow me away with your stick-to-it-iveness.

    CONGRATULATIONS!!! just doesn't seem enough, so I'm opening a bottle of Alsace Gewurztraminer that I bought for Christmas, that I might toast you.

     

    (Raising Glass) - Here's to the absolute, undisputed and unequivocal KING of posting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    (Raising Glass once again) - And here's to another 7 years!!!

    Way to go, Papy!

    Erik mentioned the 189 categories that you help manage, but he neglected to mention the 10 grand-kids that also occupy an inordinate amount of your time!

    Keith

    Thanks my friend, and Merry Christmas, Cheers

  3. On 7/30/2023 at 2:51 AM, ScroogieII said:

    Just thought it might be time to drag this back up to the top to allow Papy the opportunity to add the final word on the actual number of NEW CATEGORIES (the operative number here, after all) he had managed to snag.

    Hint! Hint - Papy............................

    Hey Keith
    Here is a summary of the new categories that I managed to have thanks to our journey together. Alberta 33 new categories, British Columbia 38 new and USA 20 new, so a total of 91 new categories in my table. A big thank you Keith for all the time spent with me on the roads of Canada, and for all the preparation work you had done.
    Phil called "Papy"

    • Upvote 1
    • Helpful 1
  4. 36 minutes ago, Ariberna said:

    It's okay to launch a forum about bad photos and give your opinion.

    It is also good to ask if as a reviewer you can ask for things that are not mandatory in the category and that only one person answers.

    Well, you know what I say, that sometimes the forums and the WM are better than the ability and wisdom of a reviewer, who says that wikipedia is important to demonstrate that something really exists, and that when wikipedia puts an artistic style on it, they deny it because he feels like it or says that he sends it to a vote when only he votes.

    I'm sorry, but if I don't say it I'm going to bust and now I guess the thread will be censored.

    ???????????

    • Surprised 1
  5. My role as an officer in certain categories is becoming more and more difficult. The quality of the proposed wyamarks begins to deteriorate. It looks like the photos are taken in a hurry, just to make numbers and meet the minimum requirements. The non-mandatory variables are not even filled in anymore. Research is minimal. Not a word of apology when you can't find enough things to say about the waymark. When you refuse a waymark, it's just if you're not verbally attacked. I have a lot of trouble playing my role as an officer. I'm not trying to disparage anyone, I'm just giving you my resentment. How do you feel my friends, am I the only one to be in this case?

    • Funny 1
    • Love 5
×
×
  • Create New...