Jomarac5

quote: Jayloki wrote:I read in the threads a while back something about a webpage that kept stats on how many finds cachers had etc etc. Does such a beast exist still?? If you're referrring to Dan's stat site, it's gone. You can find some opt-in stats now at keenpeople.com. *****

This makes as much sense as a private thread. As I've already said, it's a waste of time. ***** [This message was edited by Jomarac5 on October 12, 2003 at 02:12 AM.]

quote: Zuuky wrote:So, I'll stop. Have your thread back. *****

quote: Zuuky wrote:That would be like.... well, I won't post that here... e-mail me if you want to know. What makes you think that I care? Better check out your nearby theater. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

quote: Zuuky wrote (a whole bunch of senseless crap, and then):And oh yeah, where is Captain Urchin now? At a theater near you. Where else would he be? ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

Zuuky, you are the one that derailed your own thread in the general forum by telling local cachers that they could not participate in your contest. Doesn't matter what you say your reason was, you asked for cachers to come forward to assist with your judging and when RobertM came forward, you snubbed him. And not only him, but all cachers in the Vancouver area and on Vancouver Island. No one was off topic in your thread. You stuck your foot in your mouth and couldn't get it out. Don't blame others for the tread patterns left on your lips. What is it with you lately? You're following a couple of us around in the forums and going WAY out of your way to incite things. You've even threatened me with online bashings. If you're going to dish it out, you'd best be fully prepared to take it back -- and as you've seen, we're much better at giving it out than you are. You named me as Captain Urchin and it didn't get the response that you had hoped for -- don't be a sore loser. Be a man and get over it. People here don't mind the Captain Urchin concept nearly as much as you would to believe, and now you're upset and throwing these temper tantrums. You've said a lot of things in the last short while that are just not true. You are the one that is way out of line here and you won't let anything go. Treat people around here with some respect, and maybe you'll get some back in return. It's that simple. And that goes for your buddy as well. Take a break Zuuky. You're overly committed to your anger and you can't see what what an a$$ you are making of yourself. Step back. Breathe deep. And see it for what it is. If you get any of this post, you'll stop posting these ridiculous diatribes and give yourself some time to let it sink in. BTW: I'll post to any thread in these public forums that I please, so don't be threatening me. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

quote: Jayloki wrote:Are you guys hard up on a topic to chat about or what?? Not really. It just seems that lately, anything that we want to talk about is being shut down. You have no idea how things are around here. And then we get lectured about respect. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

Good question. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

quote: Zuuk wrote:I asked you to stop. Where's the problem? I am on topic -- I asked a question about your contest and commented on your reply. If you'd prefer that I don't post at all, just say so. Maybe you'd prefer that other local cachers don't post either? ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

Must be well suited for a micro then. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

What size of Lock & Lock are you giving away? ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

Since you are excluding local cachers from participating in your contest, you've made it a local issue. Who's going to buy that you're worried about a local bias? You just don't want to include RobertM on your judging committee because you have a bias towards him. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

Seems to me that you're excluding people from your own neighbourhood, and it doesn't seem quite fair to me -- in fact, I don't think that this attitude is in the intended spirit of the sport. I guess by the same token, we can all exclude you from our game as well. Perhaps you should stop visiting our caches if you feel that we don't fit into your perfect little caching world. My caches are no longer vegetable friendly: ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

LOL! ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

Hey RobertM, something in the wind got me thinking that you've got a certain local cacher *wondering* what's really going on. But then I shouldn't really be surprised, he's been *wondering* about that for a very long time. I'll bet he's not *wondering* what others think about him posting pointed and confrontational juvenile posts in the forums when you and I are pretty much ignoring his rhetoric. Makes me *wonder* why the forum moderator hasn't warned him about his obvious trolling. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

It appears that the following are not being accepted: Both align=left and align=right in the img tag. Border=0 in the img tag. See here for an example. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

quote: scoobie10 wrote:I would make a lousy Mod because I would be doing that all the time. Good thing that you're not a moderator then, because one moderator who sets things off right from the start is one too many already. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

Hmmm... Friggin? Sounds close to 'frigate'. Didn't pirates sail frigates? Why yes they did. Is is possible that Zuuk is a pirate? Hmmm... ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

quote: Bloencustoms wrote:I know this much, if the thread was locked, (which it could have been) we wouldn't be able to discuss the possible reasons for it's current trend. I'm not so sure of that... ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

And I doubt that the topic would have gotten as heated as it did, had CO Admin stayed out of it all together. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

You might think that, but I doubt that if CO Admin had continued posting that it would have settled down. Your claim cannot be substantiated. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

quote: Bloencustoms wrote:A moderator stepped in early on in the thread, and now it is humming along smoothly. The proof is in the pudding. Actually, once the moderator stopped inputting into the discussion near the top of page 2, the discussion has stayed pretty much on topic. That CO Admin stopped posting heavy-handed posts, couldn't have had anything to do with it? Nooooo.... of course not. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

Aye we do jimmyjames. Arrr!!! ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

quote: RobertM wrote:Just who does HE think he is? I'm not sure. Seems that he does think he's an admin by the tone in that message as well as a couple of his recent posts as well. I still however, cannot see the point to his ramblings. If he has something to say, why doesn't he just say it? I'd like to thank you for your contribution to this discussion RobertM, it's refreshing to see some relevant content in here. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.

Well Zuuky, one last response before putting you on permanent ignore... quote: If I am intellectually inferior to you, why do you always resort to name calling when you run out responses to the facts I present? You see, this is why I find it so pointless to engage in a discussion with you. I did not say that you were intellectually inferior -- I said that I was bored with your drivel and find it lacking in intellectual content -- there's a pretty significant difference -- you don't read things carefully and then you say that things have been said that indeed have not been said. That is why I will not engage you in this silly excersize. Why don't you just answer RobertM's question: What IS your point? And while your're at it, why not pursue an answer for this unanswered question? Ignore shields on full. ***** You need a good command of the language to be a moderator.