I don't get it. On this person's blog they state:
"Is it just meaness and a kill joy attitude that motivates us? No. Not at all. We find a number of caches and letterboxes placed in non sensitive areas. There are educational earth caches. Puzzels that are fun and leave no junk or swag in sensitive eco-systems. We sign the log and move on. If it were only meaness that motivates we would remove them all. If it were only meaness that motivates this blog wouldn't exist to warn and list the areas these things will not be tolerated."
So then why would a micro that I placed on my parents' property along a community placed trail that clearly states: "No need for any bushwhacking or climbing into any thorns. You do not need to go into the woods to retrieve it." be targeted by this nut? The blog (clearly someone in Washington state) acts as if they only care to remove caches that are placed in "eco-sensitive areas". So, how does mine apply? It looks as if either this person, or a copy-cat, just signed up yesterday and randomly spammed over 3000 caches just to get the word out. No thought or care went into any of the caches they targeted, the complete antithesis of what they state in their blog. I hope ForestDefenders is reading this. That's what you want, right? Attention? Then tell me how my itty-bitty micro applies and when you're gonna fly out from WA to destroy it? I'll have my parents have you arrested for trespassing. Darn hypocritical hippie... How much trash have I removed from local kids beer party hangouts in the woods that have nothing to do with geocaching? I'd love to shove a CITO right up their bottom.