foomanjoo

YAY... St. Kitts and Saint Kitts will finally be united as one! Aww… I’ll lose a country from my total.

I ran my PQs for GCF-Pittsburgh Thursday night but hadn't received them before going to bed. They still hadn't come in before flying from California to Pennsylvania, so I amended them when I arrived in Pittsburgh changing them to run on Friday instead of Thursday. Nothing processed. It's now Saturday morning and I'm sitting in a diner rather than caching. I tried updating one of the existing PQs but nothing happened. I archived all of my GCF PQs, created new ones and nothing happened. I'm 2,400 miles from home and have one find. I'm now entering the caches into my GPSr one by one from the individual cache pages. Ugh. Oh well, at least the autumn foliage is pretty!

I'm all for the CACA series. I've only found one in the Cache Across America series but I think it's a great concept that is distinct from simply finding a cache in each of the 50 states. It's the same difference that the CACA series would have from the 58 county challenge.

I'm with Ben on the one county challenge per state opinion. Having a second (on through 58th) version simply reduces the challenge of the challenge cache. If you're bent on creating a new challenge cache, you could place a cache in each of the 58 counties and make a challenge cache from that à la Cache Across America. You could even call it the Cache Across California Adventure (CACA for short) and use the acronym as part of the naming convention for each cache! For example, you could use the acronym followed by the county name: CACA Lake, CACA Kings, CACA Del Norte. Or you could put the county name before the acronym: Orange CACA, Imperial CACA, Inyo CACA.