It's funny. As I started to read this thread, I was having trouble understanding the issue with group logs. Now I see where you are coming from, but think you're also making a bold assumption that all groups are the type described as doing something wrong. Clearly I'm not alone in caching with a group that isn't at all like the ones above. I cache in the US in the summers with my family. That can be anywhere from 2-6 cachers. When it's just 2 of us, we sign individually, but when we get bigger than that, we sign as the Bean Team. I am very careful to log which exact members of Bean Team might have been present at the cache. I even refused to let my son log a cache as part of the Bean Team because he sat in the car while we hiked off the road a wee bit to get the cache (one of the best caches I've seen!). We log as a group to save log space (so many tiny logs, so little time) and to save time in muggle-rich areas. If a cache owner put that note and I saw it (doubtful), I'd respect it. But I'd also feel bad for them that we were using 6 lines of the tiny sheet (and knowing my kids, far more than that because they always end up taking up more than one line with their big old signatures!) instead of one... But that's just me and the way we group cache. I know there are some who don't function that way at all. Oh, and we were likely to have TFTC type logs early on given that I had no idea cache owners wanted to read more until I poked around on the forum. Now if the cache is in a lovely area or interesting to find, I'll log a bit. I even went back and beefed up logs for some particularly awesome finds. And, funny enough, I favorited caches that I only wrote TFTC initially... How much I write doesn't mean I don't think the cache is great. Now I'll put a little more, but sometimes words fail me but the favorite point never does .