Jump to content

Hokers

+Premium Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hokers

  1. Help. I bought this unit mostly for geocaching and hiking, but also because it is supposed to function as a decent route navigator.

     

    No matter how I try to get it to caculate a turn by turn route I get a message that there are no roads near the starting point. Even if I am in the car and on a road. I updated to the beta software and that made no difference.

     

    Help...

  2. Why is it rude if it is my cache page and I don't want to discourage others from coming to the cache or the log is incorrect such as the cache that was replaced by another?

     

    Why would I want to go to your cahce if the log was too full to sign? It would be just be a waste of time. It is rude to knowingly waste the time of another person, yes?

    Well that's just silly. Is signing the log book the only reason you cache? :huh:

     

    No. But with plenty of caches in the area, why would I not wait for this one to be ready when I get there? Yes I enjoy the hike, but if I can't sign the log, then it is not a real find. Why spend time doing that when I can hike to a cache that has room on the log?

  3. Why is it rude if it is my cache page and I don't want to discourage others from coming to the cache or the log is incorrect such as the cache that was replaced by another?

     

    Why would I want to go to your cahce if the log was too full to sign? It would be just be a waste of time. It is rude to knowingly waste the time of another person, yes?

     

    If you read the entire thread, you would see that I would delete the log after I maintained the cache so it wasn't a waste of your time. Um, also, the cache in question is two feet from a parking lot and ten feet from the entrance of a unimart. Perhaps I would ask for a sales receipt or piece of paper to replace the log.

     

    If you waited till after the maintenence to delete the log, then our views are closer than I thought. Have a nice day then.

  4. Why is it rude if it is my cache page and I don't want to discourage others from coming to the cache or the log is incorrect such as the cache that was replaced by another?

     

    Why would I want to go to your cahce if the log was too full to sign? It would be just be a waste of time. It is rude to knowingly waste the time of another person, yes?

  5. Why are you thinking of doing anything?

     

    I doubt that he has claimed your entire area .1 miles at a time, you still have room to place caches. His rude logs will evenentually move off the page, and also 1 rude log in a list of nice ones quickly stands out as being off.

     

    Ignore him, ignore the logs, ignore him at meetings. You are only ruining your own experience.

     

    If you must do something, place a super cool cache in the middle of all his. See what cachers that hit the area say about yours in comparison.

  6. While a cashe at the even would have to be temparary one and could not be offically listed here, why not place one and post the coords in a post here and on a burning man forum.

     

    I would steer away from ammo caches and mark it well, lots of pople at the event are going to be using some heavy drugs, so don't freak them out, ok.

  7. I like what you did for him. Caches placed in honor of a milestone have some leeway in terms of the honoree in my mind. Might have felt different on a regular cache but see no problem with this one.

     

    I think the FTF mainiacs have to accept that they might not be first on milestone caches.

  8. As to keeping it interesting for the whole family, we better start hiding them in XBox's, because that's the only way to keep most of the older teenagers involved.

     

    Forget GPS the Movie, I want GPS the Game (playable over X-Box Live of course).

     

    Actually finding new places in Oblivion is a bit like using a GPS, you have a compass and as you get closer the icon gets darker. Yes, I'm a nerd.

  9.  

    Everyone gets home and logs each cache along with a great stories and photos!! :D

     

    Two days later CR deletes all their logs..... :D

     

    From what I remember about the original incident, no photos were posted, you are twisting the logic now.

    I have no idea what you are talking about. Our group always posts some photos....

     

    I am refering to the CCC incident, which is just about the only real world example of a log being deleted in this thread.

     

    From the cache owner's post:

    CCCooperAgency has also mentioned that there are photos to prove the HCT was at the caches in question. As of today, I still have not seen any of the photos but I do look forward to seeing them someday.

     

    I suppose it is possible that there is no connection between the real world example and your theoretical one, but thats where it lead me.

  10. Thanks for the details Alabama, I was able to find some but not all in the threads.

     

    I think I am going to step away from these political threads, my time would be better spent finding the best TB's to take with me to Victoria BC next month.

     

    You all take care.

  11. So do you have a similar graph of the "micro" caches in the Chicago area?

     

    No, but Markwell posted the numbers a while back.

     

    Darn, I would have liked to see that, just for the spike that the 99 bottles caches would have created.

  12. Can somone explain to me the signing the container thing? Do people do this when the the log is missing or full? Or is it an attemt to leave a more permament mark on the cache?

     

    For the record I like the middle ground of removing the counts everywhere except the profile.

  13. From reading this thread can you show me the examples where the cache owners (CR and ET) are telling others how to run their caches?

    I don't know about ET, but CR has a long history of telling people that they should cache the way that he does because he does it better, or knows better. My reference to him wasn't something he'd specifically said in this thread. However he's done it in several recent threads (one about micros and one about additional logging requirements to name two). He actually may have done it in this thread too, I just haven't read the entire thing to look for an example for you.

     

    It seems to me that a lot of others are telling them how to handle the caches they (CR and ET) own. I think that is bogus. They are deleting entries that have insufficent proof which is within their right. They did not take away the experience of finding the cache, only your smiley.

    Some may be, but I wasn't. In fact, I specifically said in my post that if he wants to audit his log then it's cool. It's his cache.

     

    I am not familiar with his holier than thou history, so I will have to trust you that he can get out of hand on occasion. After reading 18 pages of this thread, I was kinda bitter when I posted. I wanted to use your post to question the views of some of the hardline "you sould not question our log entry" folks, but wrote it badly. Sorry about that.

  14. For the group cachers, taking a pic would prob go a long way towards proving your group only logs. Have you ever had one deleted where you sent a group pic proving that there were at least that many (+1, possibly) people there?

     

    Good point. The guy holding the camera? He's not in the picture, no smilie for him.

     

    You seem to have missed the point of my adding the +1. Yes there may be a casher holding the camera.

  15. This is an interesting post:

     

    The only thing I think is absurd is when people think they know the right way to cache, and they try to force their way on other people.

     

    If CR wants to audit his cache logs against his online logs and delete the extra finds, that's cool. It's his cache.

    If CR wants to tell me that I have to do the same thing in order to be a good cacher, that's absurd.

     

    If somebody wants to log a cache of mine that they didn't find, but someone in a group they were riding with that night did, that's fine with me. It's their history.

    If someone else wants to tell me I shouldn't allow it because they don't allow it on their caches, that's absurd.

     

    If someone wants to log an event 100 times for whatever reason, it's cool with me. It's their history.

    If someone wants to tell me that I shouldn't think it's okay because it's not okay with someone else, that's absurd.

     

    If someone wants to require finders to log their finds with a poem (or some other requirement), it's cool. It's their cache, and if I don't like it I don't have to find it.

    If someone else tries to get the site to ban additional requirement caches just because they don't want to do them, that's absurd.

     

    From reading this thread can you show me the examples where the cache owners (CR and ET) are telling others how to run their caches? It seems to me that a lot of others are telling them how to handle the caches they (CR and ET) own. I think that is bogus. They are deleting entries that have insufficent proof which is within their right. They did not take away the experience of finding the cache, only your smiley.

     

    For the group cachers, taking a pic would prob go a long way towards proving your group only logs. Have you ever had one deleted where you sent a group pic proving that there were at least that many (+1, possibly) people there?

×
×
  • Create New...