Commercial???!!!
I wasn't aware that asking a few questions about the Bible as part of the cache was commercial. If that's the case, I'd better archive "Three Hour Tour" post haste! Can't have those references to Gilligan's Island [©1987 Turner Pictures Entertainment] in there, now can we?
C'mon folks. This is just a bit ridiculous. I visited the cache and didn't feel like I was on a pilgramage to conversion. I've put Bibles in some of my own caches. I've used Tupperware [tm. of Tupperware Worldwide] for cache containers. Guess I'm trying to extoll the virtues of Tupperware over Brand-X.
Yeah, I'm carrying this to the level of absurdity, but that's where this game/sport is headed if we start nit-picking everyone's caches. If the cache had been hidden on church grounds, where the cacher would have been led to a "business", I might be able to understand this. The cache was located in a city park. I didn't even have to sign a statement of faith in the logbook. Amazing! Mind you, I would still attempt to be the first finder even if the cache contained the Koran, Qabalah or Mao's Little Red Book. Nine times out of ten, the hunt, not the cache contents, is the allure.
The bottom line is, unless someone can convincingly demonstrate how a few questions about the Bible can constitute a "commercial" angle, I'd say there are two choices: either allow the cache or find a more logical reason for it's archival.
IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE FOCUS/LOCATION/ETC. OF A CACHE YOU DON'T HAVE TO SEARCH FOR IT!