Scarymole

If you go to Falmouth then http://coord.info/GC2C7R3 is worth looking for

Having found mostly small urban caches the main thing that stops me signing logs is just that there's either no space or the log isn't in a fit condition to sign, usually because it's wet (very common at the moment). I've always understood the rule is that if you can't sign it take a photo - making sure you don't give the location away too much of course. Incidentally, I always recommend pencils rather than pens for Geocaching as they write vertically... handy when the only hard thing to lean on is a tree or a wall

I've never liked caches in phone boxes, you always get the idea that everyone passing is looking at you and thinking that you're doing something dodgy like peeing or putting up pics of semi-clad women.

I've been trying to do something similar. I work in the centre of London and have been popping out in my lunch breaks and have 'smiley faced' a large area of the West End. The problem is of course that now the nearest ones are too far away to get to and back so I'm kinda stuck. I know this isn't very selective but even though they're not all particularly clever hides the majority are in interesting locations I'd never have gone to otherwise. It's also the annoyance when I make a visit somewhere like a park and get all the caches but one and it's not worth making the visit back another time just for that one

One thing that occurred to me is that if they're all suspended automatically and then need re-enabling manually does that mean that there'll effectively be a clear out of older caches that haven't been attended for a while? I know that cache owners are supposed to regularly visit their caches but there are some, such as the 'Flanopoly' series, that are still active but not being looked after. Presumably these will end for good when the ban comes into affect